[1]武星蕾,吴爱东,吴爱林.准直器角度对鼻咽癌容积旋转调强计划及剂量验证的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(11):1249-1254.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.11.002]
　WU Xinglei,WU Aidong,WU Ailin.Effects of collimator angles on planning and dose verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(11):1249-1254.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.11.002]
点击复制

准直器角度对鼻咽癌容积旋转调强计划及剂量验证的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第11期
页码:
1249-1254
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of collimator angles on planning and dose verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）11-1249-06
作者:
武星蕾; 吴爱东; 吴爱林
中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区， 安徽 合肥 230031
Author(s):
WU Xinglei;  WU Aidong;  WU Ailin
West Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230031, China
关键词:
鼻咽癌; 容积旋转调强; 准直器角度; 剂量验证
Keywords:
nasopharyngeal carcinoma;  volumetric modulated arc therapy;  collimator rotation;  dose verification
分类号:
R815.6
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.11.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：通过旋转准直器，研究准直器的旋转对鼻咽癌容积旋转调强（VMAT）计划与剂量验证的影响。方法：选择10名T3期鼻咽癌患者，每位患者分别设计10个VMAT计划，10个VMAT计划准直器角度分别为0°、5°、10°、15°、20°、25°、30°、35°、40°、45°，比较分析不同计划中靶区剂量、危及器官和正常组织的受照剂量以及机器跳数，并对每个计划进行剂量验证。结果：准直器角度为10°的VMAT计划，PGTVnx、PTV1以及PTV2的HI均值最小，CI均值最大（P<0.05）。PGTVnd的HI均值在所有计划中变化不大（P>0.05），CI均值在5°~30°最大（P<0.05）。脑干、脊髓以及眼球Dmax在5°~20°时较小（P<0.05），视交叉和下颌骨Dmax在15°~25°时较小，腮腺V30在35°时最小。靶区外正常组织，在低剂量区V5~V20时，0°和5°受照体积最低，在高剂量区V25~V50，10°最低。在不同的准直器角度，机器跳数平均值最小的是准直器为0°的计划，最大的是30°（P<0.05）。所有计划的γ通过率均在98%以上，其中准直器在20°时通过率最高。结论：在进行鼻咽癌VMAT计划设计时，可以将准直器角度设置在10°~20°来获取更好的靶区剂量分布，减少危及器官以及正常组织的受照剂量，同时不会降低剂量验证的通过率。 【关键词】鼻咽癌；容积旋转调强；准直器角度；剂量验证
Abstract:
Objective To study the effects of collimator rotation on the planning and dosimetric verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods Ten patients with stage T3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma were selected and 10 VMAT plans with collimator angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°, 40°and 45° were designed for each patient. Dosimetric parameters, such as target coverage, the dose to organs-at-risk and normal tissues as well as monitor units, were compared among different plans, and dose verification was performed on each plan. Results The PGTVnx, PTV1, and PTV2 in VMAT plan with a collimator angle of 10° had the lowest average homogeneity index and the largest average conformity index (P<0.05). The differences in average homogeneity index of PGTVnd among all plans was trivial (P>0.05), and the maximum average conformity index occurred at 5°-30° (P<0.05). The maximum doses to brain stem, spinal cord and eyeball were relatively lower at 5°-20° (P<0.05); the maximum doses to optic chiasm and mandible were relatively smaller at 15°-25°; and the smallest parotid gland V30 was at 35°. For the normal tissue outside the target areas (B-P), the minimum radiation volume in low-dose region (V5, V10, V15 and V20) was at 0°and 5°, while that in high dose region (from V25 to V50) was at 10°. Among all plans, the average monitor unit is minimum for the plan with collimator angles of 0° and was maximum for the plan with collimator angles of 30° (P<0.05). The average gamma passing rates for all plans were above 98%, and the plan with collimator angles of 20° had the highest gamma passing rate. Conclusion In VMAT planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, collimator angle can be set at 10°-20° to obtain better target dose distribution, reduce the doses to organs-at-risk and normal tissues while maintaining the passing rate of dose verification.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙小喆,孟慧鹏,史孝伟,等.胸部肿瘤容积旋转调强放射治疗摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):34.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.009]
[2]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[3]陈广涛,汪 淇,刘亚强,等.TrueBeam加速器射野准直器跟随功能在鼻咽癌固定野调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4865.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.005]
[4]潘宇辉,陈榕钦,柏朋刚,等.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗前后腮腺体积及空间几何位置变化研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.005]
[5]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[6]黄利生,庄婷婷,伍方财,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗Ib区剂量分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5265.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.010]
[7]易金玲,金献测,周永强,等.鼻咽癌IMRT与VMAT治疗的计划与剂量验证比较研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3859.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.006]
[8]金献测,易金玲,周永强,等.鼻咽癌同步加量调强放射治疗新的计划质量评估指标研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3978.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.004]
[9]蒋晓芹,段宝风,艾平,等.基于图谱库的自动轮廓勾画软件(ABAS)在鼻咽癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3997.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.008]
[10]张达光,蒋胜鹏,李智华,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗中解剖结构改变及剂量分布变化的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.006]
[11]张俊俊,邱小平,李奇欣,等.ArcCheck系统在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.009]
[12]苏欢繁,全红,梁志文,等.鼻咽癌放疗中3种调强技术对摆位误差的敏感性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1102.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.005]
　SU Huanfan,QUAN Hong,LIANG Zhiwen,et al. Sensitivity of 3 kinds of intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques to setup errors in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(11):1102.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.005]
[13]程婷婷,张彦秋,张子健,等.晚期鼻咽癌螺旋断层调强放疗与容积旋转调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(9):1005.[doi:1005-202X（2018）09-1005-07]
　CHENG Tingting,ZHANG Yanqiu,ZHANG Zijian,et al.Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for latestagenasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):1005.[doi:1005-202X（2018）09-1005-07]
[14]刘致滨,石锦平,张利文,等. 光子优化算法与逐级递进解析优化算法在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强计划的剂量学对比研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):872.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.002]
　LIU Zhibin,SHI Jinping,ZHANG Liwen,et al. Dosimetric study on photon optimization algorithm and progressive resolution optimization algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(11):872.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.002]
[15]吴凡,郎锦义,许敬辉,等.5种铅门X轴固定技术在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(2):133.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.02.001]
　WU Fan,LANG Jinyi,XU Jinghui,et al.Dosimetric study of 5 fixed-jaw techniques in volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(11):133.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.02.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-05-18 【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（11805198） 【作者简介】武星蕾，硕士，工程师，主要研究方向：肿瘤放射物理学、放疗质控技术等，E-mail: 18005638890@163.com 【通信作者】吴爱东，博士，硕士生导师，高级工程师，E-mail: aidongwu@21cn.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-28