[1]李申超,沈树成,赵汝彬,等.肝细胞癌常规与缩小射束夹角放疗计划的肝段剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2025,42(12):1556-1563.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2025.12.003]
　LI Shenchao,SHEN Shucheng,et al.Dosimetric comparison of hepatic segments between conventional and beam angle-reduced radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2025,42(12):1556-1563.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2025.12.003]
点击复制

肝细胞癌常规与缩小射束夹角放疗计划的肝段剂量学比较()

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
42
期数:
2025年第12期
页码:
1556-1563
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2025-12-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dosimetric comparison of hepatic segments between conventional and beam angle-reduced radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma
文章编号:
1005-202X（2025）12-1556-08
作者:
李申超1; 2; 沈树成1; 2; 赵汝彬3; 李需2; 仇清涛2; 尹勇2
1.山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院）研究生部， 山东 济南 250117； 2.山东第一医科大学附属肿瘤医院（山东省肿瘤防治研究院，山东省肿瘤医院）放射物理技术科， 山东 济南 250117； 3.临沂市人民医院北城新区医院放疗技术科， 山东 临沂 276000
Author(s):
LI Shenchao1;  2;  SHEN Shucheng1;  2;  ZHAO Rubin3;  LI Xu2;  QIU Qingtao2;  YIN Yong2
1. Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China 2. Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Cancer Institute, Shandong Cancer Hospital), Jinan 250117, China 3. Department of Radiotherapy Technology, Beicheng New District Hospital of Linyi Peoples Hospital, Linyi 276000, China
关键词:
肝细胞癌; 放疗计划; 肝段; 射束夹角; 剂量评估
Keywords:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma radiotherapy plan hepatic segment beam angle dosimetric evaluation
分类号:
R318；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2025.12.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较肝细胞癌常规放疗计划与缩小射束夹角放疗计划在各肝段剂量学指标上的差异，探索缩角策略对肝段剂量分布的影响与临床可行性。方法：纳入29例原发性肝细胞癌患者，首先对每例患者基于Couinaud分段法进行肝脏分段，然后分别制定常规放疗计划与肝段保护放疗计划，处方剂量统一为50 Gy，分25次照射。计划完成后通过电子射野影像装置（EPID）验证每个射野的通过率。在统计分析阶段，按Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤分期、肝段累及范围、肿瘤体积及位置进行亚组间比较剂量学参数，包括每个肝段的平均剂量（Dmean）、V20%、V30%以及靶体积（PTV）的适形度指数（Conformity Index, CI）和D98%等。结果：两计划射束平均γ通过率均≥95%，其中肝段保护（Pro）计划为95.95%，常规放疗（Con）计划为95.80%。在整体组比较中，Pro计划部分肝段实现剂量学改善，V30%在S1（P=0.028）、S6（P=0.009）及S7（P=0.014）均显著降低。进一步的亚组分析显示，T2分期组、Volume>50组、跨肝段组以及右半肝组中S1的V10%、V20%与Dmean显著降低（P<0.05）。在靶区剂量学方面，整体组及大多数亚组中，Pro计划PTV Dmin与D98%显著升高（P<0.05），Dmax与CI显著降低（P<0.05），而PTV Dmean在多数分组中与Con计划接近。结论：缩小射束夹角的肝脏放疗计划在多种临床情境下能够在保证靶区剂量覆盖的前提下降低部分正常肝段的受照剂量，提示在实际放疗中应结合肿瘤所在肝段、肿瘤大小及分期等因素优化射野布置，从而为个体化肝细胞癌放疗策略提供剂量学依据。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of each hepatic segment between conventional and beam angle-reduced radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma, and to explore the effects of beam angle reduction strategy on the dose distribution of hepatic segments and its clinical feasibility. Methods Twenty-nine patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled. For each patient, liver segmentation was performed using Couinauds classification, and two radiotherapy plans were generated: a conventional (Con) plan and a hepatic segment-sparing (Pro) plan, both with a prescription dose of 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions. After plan completion, an electronic portal imaging device was used to verify the passing rate of each field. Dosimetric parameters were compared between subgroups stratified by Child-Pugh classification, tumor stage, hepatic segment involvement, tumor volume, and tumor location. The dosimetric parameters included the mean dose (Dmean), V10%, V20%, and V30% for each hepatic segment, as well as the conformity index and D98% for the planning target volume. Results The field-specific average gamma passing rates were ≥95% for both plans, with 95.95% observed in Pro plan and 95.80% in Con plan. In the overall cohort, Pro plan achieved dosimetric benefits in some liver segments, with V30% significantly reduced in S1 (P=0.028), S6 (P=0.009), and S7 (P=0.014). Further subgroup analyses showed that in the T2 stage subgroup, tumor volume > 50 subgroup, multi-segment involvement subgroup, and right hepatic lobe subgroup, the V10%, V20%, and Dmean of S1 were significantly decreased (all P<0.05). Regarding target dosimetry, Pro plan significantly increased the Dmin and D98% of PTV (P<0.05), and significantly decreased Dmax and conformity index (P<0.05) in the overall cohort and most subgroups, while the PTV Dmean of Pro plan was comparable to that of Con plan in most subgroups. Conclusion Hepatic segment-sparing plans with reduced beam angles can effectively lower radiation exposure to some normal hepatic segments while maintaining adequate target coverage in various clinical scenarios. These findings indicate that tumor location, size, and stage should be considered when optimizing beam arrangement in clinical radiotherapy, thereby providing a dosimetric basis for personalized radiotherapy planning for hepatocellular carcinoma.

相似文献/References:

[1]何滋鱼,葛云.DICOM格式放疗计划信息的读取及显示[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4299.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.019]
[2]张艺宝,吴昊,李莎,等.临床前验证与几何对比分析基于图谱库的危及器官自动勾画[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(12):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
[3]吴昊,刘杰,岳海振,等.基于Web的剂量体积直方图数据自动提取工具开发及验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(5):433.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):433.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.001]
[4]费非,剡昌锋.肺癌放疗计划的危及器官肺分割方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(11):1097.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.11.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):1097.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.11.004]
[5]韩柱君,巩贯忠,路玉昆,等. 原发性肝细胞癌的CT影像组学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1426.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.011]
　HAN Zhujun,GONG Guanzhong,LU Yukun,et al. CT radiomic features of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):1426.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.011]
[6]闫冰,吴爱东,张洪波,等. 肝细胞癌共面和非共面容积旋转调强放疗与螺旋断层放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):877.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.003]
　YAN Bing,WU Aidong,ZHANG Hongbo,et al. Dosimetric study on coplanar and noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(12):877.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.003]
[7]王海洋,吴昊,耿建昊,等.直肠癌术前同步推量RapidPlan模型用于术后单一处方计划优化的改造测试[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(2):164.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.02.006]
　WANG Haiyang,WU Hao,GENG Jianhao,et al.Feasibility study of applying a RapidPlan model trained with pre-surgical rectal cancer SIB plans to the optimization of post-surgical non-SIB plans[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(12):164.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.02.006]
[8]刘海峰,许永生,刘钊,等.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振和弥散加权成像诊断肝细胞癌TACE术后存活或复发病灶的价值[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(5):561.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.05.006]
　LIU Haifeng,XU Yongsheng,LIU Zhao,et al.Diagnostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI and DWI in residual or recurrent lesionsafter TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(12):561.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.05.006]
[9]孔繁图,陈露茜,金锦辉,等.CT扫描电压与CT值-相对电子密度值转换曲线不匹配对放疗计划剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(3):312.[doi:1005-202X（2021）03-0312-05]
　KONG Fantu,CHEN Luxi,JIN Jinhui,et al.Effects of mismatch between CT scanning voltage and CT-RED conversion curve on radiotherapy dose[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(12):312.[doi:1005-202X（2021）03-0312-05]
[10]吴林耿,陈猛,苟庆,等.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对晚期肝细胞癌FOLFOX肝动脉灌注化疗近期疗效的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(5):602.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.05.015]
　WU Lingeng,CHEN Meng,et al.Effects of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on short-term efficacy of FOLFOX hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(12):602.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.05.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2025-03-21 【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（12275162） 【作者简介】李申超，主管技师，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗，E-mail: 237353400@qq.com；沈树成，硕士研究生，研究方向：影像医学与核医学，E-mail: 18866933314@163.com（李申超和沈树成为共同第一作者） 【通信作者】仇清涛，硕士，副研究员，研究方向：医学图像处理，E-mail: qiuqingt@ 126.com；尹勇，研究员，研究方向：放射物理，E-mail: yinyongsd@126.com（仇清涛和尹勇为共同通信作者）
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-12-29