[1]王海洋,皮一飞,韩滨,等.空气压缩设备故障引起的螺旋断层放射治疗患者计划验证通过率偏低的案例分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(1):1-5.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.01.001]
　WANG Haiyang,PI Yifei,HAN Bin,et al.A case analysis of low pass rate of helical tomotherapy patient plan verification caused by air compression equipment failure[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(1):1-5.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.01.001]
点击复制

空气压缩设备故障引起的螺旋断层放射治疗患者计划验证通过率偏低的案例分析()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第1期
页码:
1-5
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-01-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
A case analysis of low pass rate of helical tomotherapy patient plan verification caused by air compression equipment failure
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）01-0001-05
作者:
王海洋; 皮一飞; 韩滨; 贾飞; 王芳娜; 刘乐乐; 裴运通; 胡金炎; 孔凡洋; 郭跃信
郑州大学第一附属医院放射治疗部， 河南 郑州 450052
Author(s):
WANG Haiyang;  PI Yifei;  HAN Bin;  JIA Fei;  WANG Fangna;  LIU Lele;  PEI Yuntong;  HU Jinyan;  KONG Fanyang;  GUO Yuexin
Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
关键词:
螺旋断层放射治疗; 空气压缩设备; 验证通过率; 案例分析
Keywords:
Keywords: helical tomotherapy air compression equipment verification pass rate case analysis
分类号:
R144.1；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：分析影响螺旋断层放射治疗患者计划验证通过率的因素，解决通过率偏低的问题。方法：对以下因素逐一进行验证分析：[①]对ArcCHECK刻度文件重新校准，验证绝对剂量准确性；[②]对ArcCHECK矩阵校准文件重新校正，验证矩阵一致性；[③]利用第三方Matlab平台开源代码进行离线验证，测量计划系统剂量计算准确性；[④]通过每日输出点剂量测量和TomoDose测量，验证加速器输出量稳定性；[⑤]执行AAPM TG-148号报告第V.B.2.c项目和设计临床上常用的2.5 cm和5 cm铅门（Jaw）宽度的适形计划，验证Jaw到位精度；[⑥]设计临床中常用的2.5 cm和5 cm铅门宽度的适形计划和调强计划，验证多叶准直器（MLC）开关时间精度。结果：执行ArcCHECK刻度文件校准和矩阵重新校准之后，计划测试通过率无明显变化；Matlab离线验证脚本获取计划Gamma通过率，结果均在95%以上；晨检记录显示，加速器固定输出量偏差都小于2%，TomoDose结果表明加速器运行稳定；执行AAPM TG-148号报告第V.B.2.c项目检测Jaw到位精度的结果均在误差范围之内，2.5 cm与5 cm不同铅门宽度条件下适形计划，Gamma测试结果以及点剂量测量结果无明显差别；不同计划下点剂量验证误差随靶区形状不规则程度、计划复杂程度和Jaw增加而升高，证明MLC开关时间精度为主要故障因素。结论：排除多种影响因素后最终确定空气压缩设备故障引起的MLC开关时间精度问题才是导致验证通过率较差的主要原因。因此定期维护和保养空气压缩设备十分必要，同时在物理师执行质量保证项目时，应将空气压缩设备内容加入其中。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective Factors affecting the pass rate of helical tomotherapy (HT) patient plan verification were analyzed to solve the problem of low pass rate. Methods The following factors were verified and analyzed one by one: [①]The ArcCHECK scale files were recalibrated to verify the absolute dose accuracy [②]The ArcCHECK matrix calibration files were recalibrated to verify the matrix consistency [③]The dose calculation accuracy of the planning system was measured by off-line verification using open-source code of the third-party Matlab platform [④]The stability of accelerator output was verified through daily output point dose measurement and TomoDose measurement [⑤]The Jaw in-position accuracy was verified by performing the AAPM TG-148 report V.B.2.c Project and designing the conformal radiation （3DCRT） plans with the field width of 2.5 cm and 5 cm commonly used in clinical practice [⑥]The multi-leaf collimator (MLC) switching time accuracy was verified by designing 3DCRT plans and intensity-modulation radiation therapy （IMRT） plans with the field width of 2.5 cm and 5 cm commonly used in clinical practice. Results There was no significant change in the plan test pass rate after the ArcCHECK scale files calibration and matrix recalibration the Gamma pass rate of the plan obtained by off-line verification script of Matlab was above 95% the morning inspection record showed that the fixed output deviation of the accelerator was less than 2%, and the TomoDose results showed that the accelerator operated stably the results of Jaw in-position accuracy detected by implementing AAPM TG-148 report V.B.2.c project were within the error range, and Gamma test results and point dose measurement results showed no significant difference in the 3DCRT plans under the conditions of different field width of 2.5 cm and 5 cm the point dose verification error increased with the increase of target shape irregularity, plan complexity, and jaw under different plans, which proves that the accuracy of MLC switching time is the main fault factor. Conclusion After excluding a variety of influencing factors, MLC switching time accuracy caused by the failure of the air compression equipment is the main reason for the low verification pass rate after eliminating multiple contributing factors. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain the air compression equipment regularly. At the same time, the content of air compression equipment should be added in the quality assurance project performed by physicists.

相似文献/References:

[1]张晋建,黎 静,文 婷,等.Arc CHECK在乳腺癌螺旋断层放疗计划剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.021]
[2]王小深,戴相昆,陈高翔,等. 评估辐射自显影胶片非均匀性及其对螺旋断层放射治疗剂量验证的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(4):340.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.04.004]
[3]沈奕晨,王为,张松方,等. 乳腺癌螺旋断层放射治疗与调强放射治疗的剂量学研究与临床剂量实测比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(3):269.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.03.005]
　SHEN Yichen,WANG Wei,ZHANG Songfang,et al. Dosimetry study and measured dose comparison of Tomotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):269.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.03.005]
[4]蔡汉飞,方美芳,徐露,等. Gafchromic EBT3胶片在螺旋断层放射治疗计划验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(11):1257.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.004]
　CAI Hanfei,FANG Meifang,XU Lu,et al. Application of Gafchromic EBT3 film in the verification of TomoTherapy plan[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):1257.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.004]
[5]刘娟,李双双,高山宝,等. 宫颈癌螺旋断层放疗与静态调强技术的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(1):23.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.005]
　LIU Juan,LI Shuangshuang,GAO Shanbao,et al. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):23.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.005]
[6]张晋建,李志强,文婷,等.肺癌螺旋断层放疗计划设计中应用Block减少肺低剂量区的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(2):152.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.02.006]
　ZHANG Jinjian,LI Zhiqiang,WEN Ting,et al. Applying Block to reduce low-dose volume of lungs in helical tomotherapy of lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):152.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.02.006]
[7]闫冰,吴爱东,张洪波,等. 肝细胞癌共面和非共面容积旋转调强放疗与螺旋断层放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):877.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.003]
　YAN Bing,WU Aidong,ZHANG Hongbo,et al. Dosimetric study on coplanar and noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):877.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.003]
[8]徐伟,杨涛,解传滨,等. 质子点扫描技术与光子Tomotherapy在前列腺癌应用中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(10):1129.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.003]
　XU Wei,YANG Tao,XIE Chuanbin,et al. Dosimetric comparison between single spot scanning of proton therapy and tomotherapy for prostate cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):1129.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.003]
[9]方春锋,解传滨,徐寿平,等.不同铅门模式下高危分期前列腺癌螺旋断层放射治疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(2):138.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.02.002]
　FANG Chunfeng,XIE Chuanbin,et al.Dosimetric study of helical tomotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer under different jaw modes[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(1):138.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.02.002]
[10]曹潘潘,彭海燕,蒙万里,等.Tomotherapy MVCT不同配准方式对头颈部摆位的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(7):798.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.07.002]
　CAO Panpan,PENG Haiyan,MENG Wanli,et al.Effects of different registration methods for Tomotherapy MVCT on head and neck positioning[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(1):798.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.07.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-07-23 【基金项目】河南省科技计划项目（182102310578）；中华国际医学交流基金会肿瘤精准放疗星火计划临床科研基金（HDRS2020010110）；河南省教育厅重点项目（20B320035）；河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目（LHGJ20190161） 【作者简介】王海洋，硕士，工程师，研究方向：放射物理技术，E-mail: wangsea0371@163.com 【通信作者】郭跃信，硕士，主任技师，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗学，E-mail: guoyx0371@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-29