[1]戴红娅,黄江华,陈露,等. RapidArc和IMRT在脑胶质瘤术后放疗中保护海马的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1404-1407.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.007]
　DAI Hongya,HUANG Jianghua,CHEN Lu,et al. Dosimetric comparison of RapidArc and IMRT in hippocampus sparing during postoperative radiotherapy for glioma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):1404-1407.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.007]
点击复制

 RapidArc和IMRT在脑胶质瘤术后放疗中保护海马的剂量学比较()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第12期
页码:
1404-1407
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-12-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dosimetric comparison of RapidArc and IMRT in hippocampus sparing during postoperative radiotherapy for glioma
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）12-1404-04
作者:
 戴红娅1; 黄江华2; 陈露1; 钟良志1; 周一兵1
 1.陆军军医大学第二附属医院肿瘤科， 重庆 400037； 2.广东省恶性肿瘤表现遗传与基因调控重点实验室/中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院肿瘤放疗科， 广东 广州 510120
Author(s):
DAI Hongya1;  HUANG Jianghua2;  CHEN Lu1;  ZHONG Liangzhi1;  ZHOU Yibing1
 1. Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China; 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation/Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
关键词:
 ; RapidArc; IMRT; 脑胶质瘤; 海马; 术后放射治疗
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: RapidArc;  intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  glioma;  hippocampus;  postoperative radiotherapy
分类号:
R739.4
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：研究RapidArc和IMRT技术在脑胶质瘤术后放疗中保护海马的剂量学比较。 方法：选取22例脑胶质瘤术后行放疗患者，在其CT和MRI图像融合基础上勾画靶区和危及器官，分别设计IMRT和RapidArc计划，比较两种计划在计划靶区及危及器官的剂量学参数。 结果：两种计划均能满足处方剂量要求。与IMRT技术相比，RapidArc技术靶区适形度指数更接近于1（P<0.05）、靶区剂量均匀性指数无显著差异；在脑干和海马保护上，RapidArc技术比IMRT技术有明显优势，特别是海马的Dmax和Dmean值均显示在RapidArc技术中低于IMRT技术（P<0.05）。 结论：RapidArc计划可以达到或优于IMRT技术的靶区剂量分布，能更好地降低海马的受照射量，且相对MU和治疗时间均有很大的优势，是脑胶质瘤术后海马保护放射治疗计划较好的选择。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy with RapidArc (RapidArc) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in hippocampus sparing during postoperative radiotherapy in patients with glioma. Methods Twenty-two postoperative patients with glioma were selected. Based on the fusion of CT images and MRI images, the target areas and organs-at-risk were delineated. Both IMRT and RapidArc plans were designed for each patient. The dosimetric parameters of target areas and organs-at-risk were compared between two plans. Results Both IMRT and RapidArc plans met the requirements of prescribed dose. Compared with that of IMRT, the conformity index of RapidArc was closer to 1 (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in homogeneity index. In the protection of brainstem and hippocampus, RapidArc was superior to IMRT, especially in the Dmax and Dmean of hippocampus which were lower in RapidArc (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with IMRT, RapidArc shows a similar or better target dose distribution and reduces the irradiation doses to organs-at-risk, with the advantages of less monitor units and shorter treatment time. RapidArc with hippocampus sparing can be considered as the preferred treatment option in postoperative radiotherapy for glioma.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭启帅,柳先锋,钟明松,等.RapidArc技术应用于早期鼻腔NK/T细胞淋巴瘤调强放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4597.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.001]
[2]花威,张西志,张先稳,等.RapidArc在乳腺癌术后放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3984.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.005]
[3]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[4]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[5]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[6]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[7]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[8]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[9]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[10]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-06-12
【基金项目】重庆科卫联合医学科研项目（2018QNXM034）
【作者简介】戴红娅，硕士，主要研究方向：放射物理治疗，E-mail: dhycumt@163.com；黄江华，硕士，研究方向：放射治疗计划设计与物理质量保证研究与临床应用，E-mail：jianghua_huang@126.com（戴红娅和黄江华为共同第一作者）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-25