[1]张平,戴鹏,罗龙辉,等. 准直器角度对颅内两个脑转移瘤容积旋转调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1399-1403.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006]
 ZHANG Ping,DAI Peng,LUO Longhui,et al. Effects of collimator angle on volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for two brain metastases [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):1399-1403.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006]
点击复制

 准直器角度对颅内两个脑转移瘤容积旋转调强计划的影响()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第12期
页码:
1399-1403
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-12-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effects of collimator angle on volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for two brain metastases
文章编号:
1005-202X(2018)12-1399-05
作者:
 张平1戴鹏1罗龙辉1邓官华1黄庆1王军2
 1.广东三九脑科医院肿瘤综合治疗中心, 广东 广州510510; 2.南方医科大学南方医院神经外科, 广东 广州 510515
Author(s):
 ZHANG Ping1 DAI Peng1 LUO Longhui1 DENG Guanhua1 HUANG Qing1 WANG Jun2
 1. Department of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China; 2. Department of Nerosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
关键词:
 容积旋转调强准直器角度脑转移瘤剂量梯度跌落指数机器跳数
Keywords:
 Keywords: volumetric modulated arc therapy collimator angle brain metastases gradient index monitor unit
分类号:
R815.6
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 【摘 要】 目的:探讨多叶准直器角度对两个脑转移瘤容积旋转调强(VMAT)计划剂量学参数和机器跳数的影响。 方法:选择10例已放疗的颅内两个脑转移瘤患者CT图像作为研究对象,在准直器角度为0°,调整每条弧的准直器至合适角度,尽量使叶片能够最大遮挡病灶之间的正常脑组织,以VMAT方式分别设计计划,比较两组计划的靶区适形度指数、剂量梯度跌落指数(GI)、剂量均匀性指数(HI)、危及器官剂量分布、靶区周边正常组织受量体积以及机器跳数。 结果:与准直器角度为0°的计划比较,调整每条弧的准直器至合适角度,靶区适形度指数差异无统计学意义(t=1.084, P=0.32),GI和HI差异具有统计学意义(GI:t=3.415, P=0.014;HI:t=3.455, P=0.014);周边正常组织2和4 Gy剂量体积差异有统计学意义(P=0.018, P=0.045),6、12和16 Gy剂量体积差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);危及器官最大受照剂量相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);机器跳数平均减少282 MU。 结论:在两个多发脑转移瘤VMAT计划优化选择准直器运行方向,剂量梯度跌落更陡,剂量分布更均匀,且可降低正常组织低剂量区受量,以及明显减少机器跳数。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of multileaf collimator angle on the dosimetric parameters and monitor units (MU) of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with two intracranial metastases. Methods The CT images of 10 patients receiving radiotherapy for two intracranial metastases were selected in this study. When the collimator angle remained at zero degree, and the collimator was adjusted to reduce radiation dose to brain tissue in every arc (collimator angle was nonzero degree), VMAT plans were designed for various collimators without changing any optimization parameters. The conformity index, gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), MU, and dose to organs-at-risk and normal tissues around target areas were calculated and analyzed. Results Target conformity index was similar in VMAT plans with collimator angle of zero degree and nonzero degree (t=1.084, P=0.32), but VMAT plans with collimator angle of nonzero degree had lower GI and HI, with statistical significance (GI: t=3.415, P=0.014; HI: t=3.455, P=0.014). Compared with VMAT plans with collimator angle of zero degree, VMAT plans with collimator angle of nonzero degree had smaller volume of normal tissues receiving 2 and 4 Gy (P=0.018, P=0.045), but similar volume of normal tissues receiving 6, 12 and 16 Gy (P>0.05). No statistical differences were found in the maximum dose to organs-at-risk between two plans. Moreover, the comparison between two plans showed that MU was reduced by 282 MU in VMAT plans with collimator angle of nonzero degree. Conclusion The optimal selection of collimator angle in VMAT plans for two brain metastases not only improves GI and dose coverage, but also reduces doses in low dose areas and MU.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙小喆,孟慧鹏,史孝伟,等.胸部肿瘤容积旋转调强放射治疗摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):34.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.009]
[2]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[3]张俊俊,邱小平,李奇欣,等.ArcCheck系统在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.009]
[4]张矛,金海国,苏清秀,等.肺癌静态调强与容积旋转调强放射治疗间比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4364.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.006]
[5]谭丽娜,孙晓欢,马奎,等.三维剂量验证系统Delta4在容积旋转调强计划剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(06):4497.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.06.007]
[6]王沛沛,刘哲铭,李彩虹,等.容积旋转调强与固定野动态调强在直肠癌新辅助放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):901.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.030]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(12):901.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.030]
[7]李丹明,王黎,孙新臣,等.中晚期宫颈癌适形调强放疗与容积旋转调强技术临床效果比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(5):478.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.010]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):478.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.010]
[8]姚升宇,颜歌,赵国旗,等.容积旋转调强与固定野动态调强低剂量区比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(5):538.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.022]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):538.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.022]
[9]高兴旺,Wang Yang,梁志强,等.快速容积旋转调强治疗系统的验收测试[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):541.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.001]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):541.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.001]
[10]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[11]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[12]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
[13]雷伟杰,曹瑞芬,贾婧,等. 基于几何不确定性鲁棒性优化在肺癌容积旋转调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.001]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.001]
[14]刘建平,杨海芳,王志武,等. 部分弧容积旋转调强计划在中央型肺癌的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1091.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.003]
 LIU Jianping,YANG Haifang,WANG Zhiwu,et al. Application of partial arc volumetric modulated arc therapy for central lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):1091.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.003]
[15]苏欢繁,全红,梁志文,等.鼻咽癌放疗中3种调强技术对摆位误差的敏感性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1102.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.005]
 SU Huanfan,QUAN Hong,LIANG Zhiwen,et al. Sensitivity of 3 kinds of intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques to setup errors in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):1102.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.005]
[16]柏晗,陈飞虎,李文辉,等. Monaco与Pinnacle计划系统在宫颈癌容积旋转调强计划中的剂量比较及分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(6):654.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.06.007]
 BAI Han,CHEN Feihu,LI Wenhui,et al. Dosimetric comparison and analysis of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy plan for cervical cancer based on Monaco system and Pinnacle system[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):654.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.06.007]
[17]谢红亮,胡灿,曹洋森,等. 基于Monaco的食管癌容积旋转调强计划中两种优化模式的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(7):745.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.001]
 XIE Hongliang,HU Can,CAO Yangsen,et al. Comparison of dose distributions calculated by two optimization methods of Monaco system used in volumetric modulated arc therapy of esophageal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):745.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.001]
[18]鞠孟阳,史玉静,李金凯,等. 直肠内气腔对前列腺癌放疗计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(8):879.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.003]
 JU Mengyang,SHI Yujing,LI Jinkai,et al. Effects of gas cavity in rectum on radiotherapy plan for prostate cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):879.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.003]
[19]贺先桃,王占宇,谭军文,等. 固定铅门模式下容积旋转调强放疗与动态调强放疗在乳腺癌根治术后放疗中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(8):889.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.005]
 HE Xiantao,WANG Zhanyu,TAN Junwen,et al. Comparison of VMAT vs dIMRT with fixed-jaw technique for postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):889.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.005]
[20]李明,王忠明,赵军,等. 术前宫颈癌容积旋转调强与固定野动态调强技术剂量对比[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(1):29.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.006]
 LI Ming,WANG Zhongming,ZHAO Jun,et al. Dose comparison of preoperative volumetric modulated arc therapy and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(12):29.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2018-07-19
【基金项目】广东省自然科学基金(2017A030313597)
【作者简介】张平,工程师,研究方向:神经肿瘤放射物理,E-mail: zhangping0406@126.com
【通信作者】王军,主治医师,研究方向:功能与立体定向放射神经外科,E-mail: smuwangjun@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-24