[1]李明,王忠明,赵军,等. 术前宫颈癌容积旋转调强与固定野动态调强技术剂量对比[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(1):29-32.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.006]
　LI Ming,WANG Zhongming,ZHAO Jun,et al. Dose comparison of preoperative volumetric modulated arc therapy and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):29-32.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.006]
点击复制

 术前宫颈癌容积旋转调强与固定野动态调强技术剂量对比()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第1期
页码:
29-32
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dose comparison of preoperative volumetric modulated arc therapy and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）01-0029-04
作者:
 李明; 王忠明; 赵军; 周杰; 马建华
 连云港市第二人民医院放疗科， 江苏 连云港 222023
Author(s):
 LI Ming;  WANG Zhongming;  ZHAO Jun;  ZHOU Jie;  MA Jianhua
 Department of Radiotherapy, the Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222023, China
关键词:
 ; 宫颈癌; 容积旋转调强; 固定野动态调强; 加速器跳数
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: cervical cancer;  volumetric modulated arc therapy;  dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  monitor unit
分类号:
R445.4；R737.33
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：比较容积旋转调强（VMAT）和固定野动态调强放疗（DIMRT）技术在术前宫颈癌放疗中的剂量学差别。 方法：选取10例接受放疗的术前宫颈癌患者，勾画靶区，用Eclipse 11.0计划系统设计双弧VMAT计划和5野DIMRT计划，比较两者靶区的适形度指数（CI）和均匀性指数（HI）、危及器官的剂量学差别、加速器跳数和照射时间。 结果：双弧VMAT计划与5野DIMRT计划的CI（0.78±0.05，0.84±0.03; P>0.05）和HI（0.05±0.00, 0.05±0.00; P>0.05）统计学无显著性差异，膀胱的V40、V45、V50和小肠的V20、股骨头、骨盆剂量有显著性差异之外，其它指标未有显著性差异。 结论：VMAT和DIMRT技术两者均能很好达到临床剂量学的要求，但在保护正常器官方面，VMAT比DIMRT技术更优或相当，VMAT技术在减少加速器跳数和照射时间方面优势明显。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (DIMRT) in preoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Methods Ten patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer were selected. After target areas were delineated, double-arc VMAT plan and 5-field DIMRT plan were designed with Eclipse 11.0 planning system. The conformity index and homogeneity index of target areas, dosimetric differences of organs-at-risk, monitor units and treatment time were compared. Results The conformity index and homogeneity index were similar in double-arc VMAT plan and 5-field DIMRT plan (0.78±0.05 vs 0.84±0.03, P>0.05; 0.05±0.00 vs 0.05±0.00, P>0.05). No significant differences were found in dosimetric indexes, except the V40, V45, V50 of bladder, the V20 of small intestine, the dose of femoral head and pelvis. Conclusion Both VMAT and DIMRT can meet the requirements of clinical dosimetry. VMAT is equivalent or superior to DIMRT in protecting normal organs. Moreover, VMAT technology has significant advantages in reducing monitor units and shortening treatment time.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[2]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[3]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[4]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[5]余 辉,张书旭.宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004]
[6]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[7]张富利,刘清智,张伟超,等.宫颈癌术后盆腔螺旋断层调强放疗两种计划设计方法的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4229.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.003]
[8]王佳浩,赖建军,唐荣军,等.结合EPID与EUD方法确定宫颈癌病例靶区最佳生物外放边界的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4378.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.009]
[9]张富利,刘清智,王雅棣,等.基于配置不同类型MLC叶片加速器的宫颈癌术后调强放疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4383.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.010]
[10]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(1):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
[11]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[12]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(1):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
[13]薛涛,刘光波,袁香坤,等. 宫颈癌近距离腔内放射治疗中膀胱和直肠ICRU参考点剂量和体积剂量受量比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(1):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
[14]侯灵通,汪志,陈志,等. 基于蒙特卡洛方法模拟不同膀胱充盈度对宫颈癌近距离放疗的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
　HOU Lingtong,WANG Zhi,CHEN Zhi,et al. Effects of different degrees of bladder filling on brachytherapy for cervical cancer based on Monte Carlo simulation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(1):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
[15]王占宇,谭军文,龙雨松,等. 非均整与均整模式下宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗计划的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
　WANG Zhanyu,TAN Junwen,LONG Yusong,et al. Dosimetric comparison of VMAT plans in different modes for cervical cancer: flatting filter free vs flattening filter[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(1):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
[16]刘礼东,杨振,邱小平,等. 利用Delta4对放疗计划进行剂量体积直方图评价的可行性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(1):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
　LIU Lidong,YANG Zhen,QIU Xiaoping,et al. Feasibility of Delta4 for plan evaluation based on dose-volume histogram[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
[17]牛瑞军,张晖,刘志强,等. 不同剂量算法在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划设计中的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
　NIU Ruijun,ZHANG Hui,et al. Different dose calculation algorithms applied in the design of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for postoperative patients with cervical cancer: a dosimetric analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
[18]梁有腾,余辉,张书旭. 基于3种配准方法的宫颈癌外照射放疗累积剂量研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
　LIANG Youteng,YU Hui,ZHANG Shuxu. Accumulated dose in external radiation for cervical cancer based on three registration methods[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
[19]唐世强,邱小平,陈文韬,等. 宫颈癌术后不同射野数调强放射治疗与四野三维适形放射治疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
　TANG Shiqiang,QIU Xiaoping,CHEN Wentao,et al. Different-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs four-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy following radical surgery for cervical carcinoma: a dosimetry comparison[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
[20]吴骏翔,康盛伟,王培,等. 自动IMRT计划在宫颈癌术后放疗中的可行性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):394.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]
　WU Junxiang,KANG Shengwei,WANG Pei,et al.Feasibility of automatic planning in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):394.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-08-11
【基金项目】连云港市卫生与计划生育委员会科技项目（201620）
【作者单位】李明，硕士研究生，副主任技师，研究方向：生物医学工程、医学物理，E-mail: 447105659@qq.com
【通信作者】马建华，硕士研究生，副主任医师，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗，E-mail: jianhuamama@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-24