[1]欧阳水根,郭晴,刘婷婷,等.宫颈癌术后调强放疗摆位误差对靶区累积剂量偏差的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(3):295-301.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.005]
　OUYANG Shuigen,GUO Qing,LIU Tingting,et al.Effects of setup errors in postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer on cumulative target dose deviation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(3):295-301.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.005]
点击复制

宫颈癌术后调强放疗摆位误差对靶区累积剂量偏差的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第3期
页码:
295-301
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of setup errors in postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer on cumulative target dose deviation
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）03-0295-07
作者:
欧阳水根; 郭晴; 刘婷婷; 陶娜; 成坚强; 安永伟; 魏玺仪; 陶发利; 牛瑞军
甘肃省肿瘤医院放疗科， 甘肃 兰州 730050
Author(s):
OUYANG Shuigen;  GUO Qing;  LIU Tingting;  TAO Na;  CHENG Jianqiang;  AN Yongwei;  WEI Xiyi;  TAO Fali;  NIU Ruijun
Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou 730050, China
关键词:
宫颈癌; 调强放射治疗; 图像引导; 摆位误差; 剂量学; 计算机辅助
Keywords:
Keywords: cervical cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy image guidance setup error dosimetry computer-aided
分类号:
R318；R815
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：千伏级锥形束 CT（CBCT）获取分次间宫颈癌术后调强放射治疗(IMRT)摆位误差，分析分次间摆位误差对靶区累积剂量偏差的影响。方法：选取61例宫颈癌术后行调强放疗的患者，全程916次CBCT获取摆位误差，将误差值输入治疗计划系统中，由分次间摆位误差剂量叠加得到累积摆位误差剂量，通过偏差公式与标准计划剂量计算偏差百分比。结果：摆位误差x、y、z方向的偏差和偏移等中心距离分别为0.04（-0.16, 0.25）、-0.05（-0.37, 0.28）、0.10（-0.06, 0.24）和0.55（0.38, 0.78） cm。临床靶区除CTV的HIsum-HIplan和CTV1 的Dsum_D50-Dplan_D50与HIsum-HIplan无统计学差异外，其他临床靶区的配对检验均有统计学差异。计划靶区除PGTVnd的Dsum_median-Dplan_median、Dsum_mean-Dplan_mean、Dsum_D50-Dplan_D50无统计学差异外，其他计划靶区均有统计学差异。累积摆位误差剂量与标准计划剂量分布对比呈现负偏态分布，峰度降低。GTVnd、CTV、CTV1、CTVn、CTV_all与PGTVnd、PTV、PTV1、PTVn、PTV_all剂量偏差均呈降低，计划靶区的累积剂量偏差比临床靶区偏差明显增大。Dmin偏差、D98偏差、D95偏差偏离最大，Dmax偏差、D5偏差、D2偏差变化次之，Dmedian偏差、Dmean偏差、D50偏差变化最小，反S型DVH曲线向左偏移，斜率增大。临床靶区HI偏差均上升。结论：宫颈癌术后调强放疗摆位误差对靶区累积剂量影响存在统计差异性，靶区累积剂量降低、均匀性变劣。宫颈癌术后调强放疗在每次治疗前需进行CBCT位置校准以保证靶区各结构剂量准确性。在放疗计划设计时考虑增加CBCT次数带来额外剂量的风险。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To obtain the inter-fractional setup errors in postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of cervical cancer by kilovolt cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to analyze the variation of cumulative target dose deviation caused by inter-fractional setup errors. Methods A total of 61 patients treated with postoperative IMRT for cervical cancer were enrolled in the study, and their setup errors were obtained by 916 CBCT scans. The setup errors were inputted into treatment planning system, and the cumulative setup error dose was obtained by superposing the inter-fractional setup error doses. The deviation percentage was computed according to deviation formula and the standard planned dose. Results The setup errors in the x, y, z directions and offset isocentric distances were 0.04 (-0.16, 0.25)、-0.05(-0.37, 0.28)、 0.10(-0.06, 0.24), and 0.55 (0.38, 0.78) cm, respectively. Except for the HIsum-HIplan of CTV as well as the Dsum_D50-Dplan_D50 and HIsum-HIplan of CTV1, there were statistical differences in the paired test on the other clinical target areas, and there was statistical significance in the paired test on planning target areas, except for the Dsum_median-Dplan_median, Dsum?mean-Dplan_mean, Dsum_D50-Dplan_D50 of PGTVnd. The comparison of the cumulative setup error dose with the standard planned dose showed a negative skewed distribution, with a decreased kurtosis. The dose deviations of GTVnd, CTV, CTV1, CTVn, CTV_all and PGTVnd, PTV, PTV1, PTVn, PTV_all were all decreased, and the cumulative dose deviations in the planning target areas were significantly larger than those in the clinical target areas. The deviations of Dmin_deviation, D98_ deviation and D95_deviation were the largest, followed by Dmax_deviation, D5_deviation, D2_deviation, while Dmedian_deviation, Dmean_deviation and D50_deviation had the smallest deviations. The reverse S-type DVH curve was skewed to the left, with an increased slope. The HIdeviation of clinical target areas was increased. Conclusion The setup errors in the postoperative IMRT of cervical cancer which has various effects on the cumulative target dose makes the cumulative target dose reduced and the target dose homogeneity worse. Postoperative IMRT for cervical cancer requires CBCT position calibration before each treatment to ensure the accuracy of the dose of each structure in the target area. The risk of additional dose from increasing CBCT frequency should be considered in radiotherapy planning.

相似文献/References:

[1]史贵连,叶福丽.PTW729二维矩阵的平面剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.020]
[2]巩汉顺,王金媛,丛小虎,等.晚期胰腺癌适形、简化调强及螺旋断层放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.003]
[3]曾 彪,张九堂,席许平,等.单中心上下半野技术在胸中上段食管癌放射治疗中的剂量学分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):357.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.012]
[4]史贵连,叶福丽.肺癌调强放疗计划的设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.013]
[5]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[6]陈炳周,路俊哲,侯 氢.不同设计方式的调强逆向治疗计划比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):391.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.020]
[7]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[8]周 钢,田 野,陆雪官,等.同步加量技术应用于脑胶质瘤术后调强放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4727.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.002]
[9]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[10]宋 威,赵 迪,鹿 红,等.射野方向优化技术在胸中上段食管癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.003]
[11]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[12]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[13]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(3):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
[14]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
[15]牛瑞军,张晖,刘志强,等. 不同剂量算法在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划设计中的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
　NIU Ruijun,ZHANG Hui,et al. Different dose calculation algorithms applied in the design of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for postoperative patients with cervical cancer: a dosimetric analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(3):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
[16]唐世强,邱小平,陈文韬,等. 宫颈癌术后不同射野数调强放射治疗与四野三维适形放射治疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
　TANG Shiqiang,QIU Xiaoping,CHEN Wentao,et al. Different-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs four-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy following radical surgery for cervical carcinoma: a dosimetry comparison[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(3):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
[17]刘娟,李双双,高山宝,等. 宫颈癌螺旋断层放疗与静态调强技术的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(1):23.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.005]
　LIU Juan,LI Shuangshuang,GAO Shanbao,et al. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(3):23.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.005]
[18]鲍志荣,王大奖,陈诚,等. 不同骨盆勾画及限量方式下宫颈癌术后IMRT计划的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(9):1023.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.09.006]
　BAO Zhirong,WANG Dajiang,CHEN Cheng,et al. Dosimetric study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with different pelvic delineations and dose limitations following surgery for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(3):1023.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.09.006]
[19]朱志鹏,刘文其,朱蕙君,等.宫颈癌术后调强计划稳健性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(1):22.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.01.005]
　ZHU Zhipeng,LIU Wenqi,ZHU Huijun,et al.Robustness of postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(3):22.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.01.005]
[20]喻娟,侯玉桃.不同放疗方案治疗宫颈癌临床效果及剂量学差异比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(6):671.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.06.003]
　YU Juan,HOU Yutao.Comparison of clinical effects and dosimetric differences of different radiotherapy regimens in the treatment of cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(3):671.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.06.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-04-01 【基金项目】甘肃省卫生行业科研计划（GSWSKY-2015-29） 【作者简介】欧阳水根，副主任医师，从事肿瘤放射物理工作，E-mail: ouyang328@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-30