[1]郑旭亮,邢晓汾,崔桐,等.基于EPID宫颈癌IMRT验证的不同Gamma通过率参数影响分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(8):935-939.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.08.003]
　ZHENG Xuliang,XING Xiaofen,CUI Tong,et al.Effects of different parameter settings on Gamma passing rate in EPID-based IMRT verification for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(8):935-939.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.08.003]
点击复制

基于EPID宫颈癌IMRT验证的不同Gamma通过率参数影响分析()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第8期
页码:
935-939
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-08-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different parameter settings on Gamma passing rate in EPID-based IMRT verification for cervical cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）08-0935-05
作者:
郑旭亮; 邢晓汾; 崔桐; 张军; 彭金鑫
山西省肿瘤医院放疗技术室， 山西 太原 030013
Author(s):
ZHENG Xuliang;  XING Xiaofen;  CUI Tong;  ZHANG Jun;  PENG Jinxin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan 030013, China
关键词:
宫颈癌; 非晶硅电子射野影像系统;  Gamma通过率
Keywords:
Keywords: cervical cancer electronic portal imaging device Gamma passing rate
分类号:
R815.6
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.08.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：使用Varian 非晶硅电子射野影像系统（EPID）对80例宫颈癌术后患者的放疗计划进行Gamma通过率验证，分析不同机架角度、两台同型号加速器间Gamma通过率的差异；探讨3种参数设置对Gamma通过率的影响，为计划验证提供理论依据。方法：对每一患者制定7野均分治疗计划并创建验证计划，在两台相同型号的Varian Unique（1、2）加速器上进行验证并获取验证图像；通过Portal Dosimetry（PD）软件获得不同参数设置（标准剂量差异与距离符合度）下的Gamma通过率，对其进行统计学分析。结果：参数设置分别为PD_Global/PD_Local 1%/1 mm、2%/2 mm、3%/3 mm，剂量阈值10%。（1）当参数为PD_Global（2%/2 mm、1%/1 mm）时，Gan=0°的Gamma通过率优于其他角度；Gan=104°、256°的Gamma通过率低于其他角度（P<0.05）。参数为PD_Local（3%/3 mm、2%/2 mm、1%/1 mm）时，Gan=0°的Gamma通过率低于其他角度（P<0.05）。（2）参数为PD_Global 1%/1 mm、PD_Local 1%/1 mm时，Unique-2的Gamma通过率高于Unique-1（P<0.05）。结论：严格的参数设置能够体现机架角度、加速器性能等对Gamma通过率的影响；针对不同部位的肿瘤需要加入相关的分析条件。为提高放疗的精确性，物理师需要增加对射野影像装置、机架角位移、多叶准直器到位精度等设备参数的检测频率，并通过大量数据的累积与临床相结合，制定更严格的Gamma通过率参数与限值。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To verify the Gamma passing rates of radiotherapy plans in 80 patients with cervical cancer after operation using Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for analyzing differences in Gamma passing rates between two accelerators and different gantry angles, and to discuss the effects of 3 different parameter settings on the Gamma passing rate, thereby providing a practical theoretical basis for plan verification. Methods Seven-field treatment plan was developed for each patient, and the corresponding verification plan was created. Plans were verified at two accelerators of the same type (Varian Unique 1, 2), and verification images were also obtained. Portal Dosimetry (PD) was used to obtain the Gamma passing rates under different parameter settings (standard dose difference and distance to agreement), and then the obtained Gamma passing rates were statistically analyzed. Results Parameter settings included PD_Global/PD_Local 1%/1 mm, 2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm, with a dose threshold of 10%. (1) When the parameter was set as PD_Global（2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm), the Gamma passing rate of Gan=0° was the highest and the Gamma passing rates of Gan=104°, 256° were lower than others (P<0. 05). The Gamma passing rate of Gan=0° was the lowest when adopting PD_Local (3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm) (P<0.05). (2) When the parameter was set as PD_Global 1%/1 mm and PD_Local 1%/1 mm, the Gamma passing rate of Unique-2 was higher than that of Unique-1 (P<0.05). Conclusion Strict parameter setting can reflects the effect of gantry angle, accelerator performance on Gamma passing rate. Relevant analytical conditions should be added for different tumor sites. In order to improve radiotherapy accuracy, physicists need to increase the detection frequency of the equipment parameters such as imaging devices, gantry angular displacement, multileaf collimator positioning accuracy, and stricter parameters and limits of Gamma passing rate should be established through the accumulation of large amounts of data and combination with clinical information.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[2]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[3]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[4]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[5]余 辉,张书旭.宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004]
[6]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[7]张富利,刘清智,张伟超,等.宫颈癌术后盆腔螺旋断层调强放疗两种计划设计方法的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4229.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.003]
[8]王佳浩,赖建军,唐荣军,等.结合EPID与EUD方法确定宫颈癌病例靶区最佳生物外放边界的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4378.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.009]
[9]张富利,刘清智,王雅棣,等.基于配置不同类型MLC叶片加速器的宫颈癌术后调强放疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4383.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.010]
[10]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(8):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
[11]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2021-03-15 【作者简介】郑旭亮，硕士研究生，研究方向：医学放射物理，E-mail: zxlhappysky@163.com 【通信作者】邢晓汾，E-mail: tyxxf@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-07-30