[1]薛涛,孙云川,何晓阳,等. 宫颈癌后装放疗中剂量的体积优化和逆向模拟退火优化的比较分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1413-1416.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.009]
 XUE Tao,SUN Yunchuan,HE Xiaoyang,et al. Dosimetric comparison of volume- versus inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations in afterloading brachytherapy for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):1413-1416.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.009]
点击复制

 宫颈癌后装放疗中剂量的体积优化和逆向模拟退火优化的比较分析()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第12期
页码:
1413-1416
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-12-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dosimetric comparison of volume- versus inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations in afterloading brachytherapy for cervical cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X(2018)12-1413-04
作者:
 薛涛1孙云川1何晓阳2刘光波1何新颖1毕建强1肖丽1胡婷婷1刘祥1吴斌1
 1.河北省沧州中西医结合医院放疗科, 河北 沧州 061000; 2.河北省沧州市人民医院医专院区肾内泌尿科, 河北 沧州 061000
Author(s):
 XUE Tao1 SUN Yunchuan1 HE Xiaoyang2 LIU Guangbo1 HE Xinying1 BI Jianqing1 XIAO Li1 HU Tingting1 LIU Xiang1 WU Bin1
 1. Department of Radiotherapy, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM, Cangzhou 061000, China; 2. Department of Intrarenal Urology, Cangzhou People’s Hospital, Cangzhou 061000, China
关键词:
 宫颈癌后装放疗剂量优化剂量学体积优化逆向模拟退火优化
Keywords:
 Keywords: cervical cancer afterloading brachytherapy dose optimization dosimetry volume-based optimization inverse planning simulated annealing
分类号:
R815.2;R737.33
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的:比较宫颈癌腔内联合组织间插植三维后装计划中体积优化和模拟退火逆向优化(IPSA)剂量分布的差异,为其在治疗中计划设计优化方案的选择提供依据。 方法:选取15例进行了三维后装治疗的宫颈癌患者,原执行体积优化,基于原始图像重新设计IPSA计划,配对t检验两种优化方法的剂量学差异。 结果:在两组间靶区V100%和V150%以及均匀性指数方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。而靶区的适形度指数的平均值有着显著差异[体积优化(0.77±0.11),IPSA优化(0.82±0.07)],且具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。在OAR方面,与体积优化相比,IPSA优化使OAR的受照剂量明显降低,统计学差异明显(P<0.05)。 结论:与体积优化方法相比,IPSA优化在提高靶区适形度指数的同时,更好地对OAR起到保护作用,且计算过程相对简捷,是临床上更可取的计划优化算法。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To compare the differences of dose distributions between volume- and inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA)-based optimizations in three-dimensional (3D) afterloading brachytherapy plan of cervical carcinoma, and provide the reference for the selection of the plan optimization in 3D afterloading brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Methods Fifteen cases of cervical cancer treated with 3D afterloading brachytherapy were enrolled in this study, and the original optimization was based on volume. Herein another optimization plans based on IPSA were designed based on the original images. Paired t test was used to analyze the dosimetric differences between two optimization methods. Results The V100%, V150% and homogeneity index of target areas were similar in two groups, without statistical differences (P>0.05). The average value of target conformity index in IPSA-based optimization plans was higher than that in volume-based optimization plans, with statistical differences (0.82+0.07 vs 0.77+0.11, P<0.05). Compared with volume-based optimization, IPSA-based optimization significantly reduced the organs-at-risk dose, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion IPSA-based optimization is superior to volume-based optimization in target conformity index, organs-at-risk sparing, and the calculation process of IPSA-based optimization is relatively simple, which make IPSA-based optimization be a preferable choice in clinic.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[2]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[3]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[4]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[5]余 辉,张书旭.宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004]
[6]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[7]张富利,刘清智,张伟超,等.宫颈癌术后盆腔螺旋断层调强放疗两种计划设计方法的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4229.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.003]
[8]王佳浩,赖建军,唐荣军,等.结合EPID与EUD方法确定宫颈癌病例靶区最佳生物外放边界的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4378.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.009]
[9]张富利,刘清智,王雅棣,等.基于配置不同类型MLC叶片加速器的宫颈癌术后调强放疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4383.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.010]
[10]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(12):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
[11]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[12]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
[13]薛涛,刘光波,袁香坤,等. 宫颈癌近距离腔内放射治疗中膀胱和直肠ICRU参考点剂量和体积剂量受量比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
[14]侯灵通,汪志,陈志,等. 基于蒙特卡洛方法模拟不同膀胱充盈度对宫颈癌近距离放疗的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
 HOU Lingtong,WANG Zhi,CHEN Zhi,et al. Effects of different degrees of bladder filling on brachytherapy for cervical cancer based on Monte Carlo simulation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
[15]王占宇,谭军文,龙雨松,等. 非均整与均整模式下宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗计划的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
 WANG Zhanyu,TAN Junwen,LONG Yusong,et al. Dosimetric comparison of VMAT plans in different modes for cervical cancer: flatting filter free vs flattening filter[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(12):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
[16]刘礼东,杨振,邱小平,等. 利用Delta4对放疗计划进行剂量体积直方图评价的可行性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(1):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
 LIU Lidong,YANG Zhen,QIU Xiaoping,et al. Feasibility of Delta4 for plan evaluation based on dose-volume histogram[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
[17]牛瑞军,张晖,刘志强,等. 不同剂量算法在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划设计中的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
 NIU Ruijun,ZHANG Hui,et al. Different dose calculation algorithms applied in the design of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for postoperative patients with cervical cancer: a dosimetric analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
[18]梁有腾,余辉,张书旭. 基于3种配准方法的宫颈癌外照射放疗累积剂量研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
 LIANG Youteng,YU Hui,ZHANG Shuxu. Accumulated dose in external radiation for cervical cancer based on three registration methods[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
[19]唐世强,邱小平,陈文韬,等. 宫颈癌术后不同射野数调强放射治疗与四野三维适形放射治疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
 TANG Shiqiang,QIU Xiaoping,CHEN Wentao,et al. Different-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs four-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy following radical surgery for cervical carcinoma: a dosimetry comparison[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
[20]吴骏翔,康盛伟,王培,等. 自动IMRT计划在宫颈癌术后放疗中的可行性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):394.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]
 WU Junxiang,KANG Shengwei,WANG Pei,et al.Feasibility of automatic planning in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):394.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-06-12
【作者简介】薛涛,物理师,研究方向:近距离放疗剂量学,E-mail: 506483907@qq.com
【通信作者】孙云川,主任医师,研究方向:放疗临床,E-mail: 13932729-
095@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-26