[1]嵇卫星,张建英,肖寒,等. 剂量学参数计算方法对治疗计划评估结果的影响分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(5):519-525.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.05.005]
　JI Weixing,ZHANG Jianying,XIAO Han,et al.Effects of different methods of dosimetry parameter computation on treatment plan evaluation results[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(5):519-525.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.05.005]
点击复制

 剂量学参数计算方法对治疗计划评估结果的影响分析()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第5期
页码:
519-525
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-05-22

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different methods of dosimetry parameter computation on treatment plan evaluation results
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）05-0519-07
作者:
 嵇卫星; 张建英; 肖寒; 李婷婷; 张玉洁
 复旦大学附属中山医院放疗科， 上海 200032
Author(s):
 JI Weixing;  ZHANG Jianying;  XIAO Han;  LI Tingting;  ZHANG Yujie
 Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
关键词:
鼻咽癌; 治疗计划系统; 剂量学; 剂量体积直方图
Keywords:
 ; nasopharyngeal carcinoma;  treatment planning system;  dosimetry;  dose-volume histogram
分类号:
R730.55
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.05.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：分析不同算法对同一个治疗计划进行评估时剂量学参数的变化。 方法：以两种计划系统设计的66例鼻咽癌计划为研究对象，对自主编写评估软件和治疗计划系统读取的剂量学参数结果做比较，研究不同算法下剂量学参数的变化，分析D2和Dmax的差异，并研究D0.01 cc代替Dmax的可行性。 结果：Pinnacle与XiO中读取的剂量学参数与评估软件读取的数据之间存在类似的差异。当器官的体积减小时，Dmax以及Dmean的绝对值偏差都会变大，Dmax的偏差要更大。所有计划中5%的Dmax差值高于292 cGy，5%的Dmean差值高于55 cGy。除PTVnx外，D2的差值平均值都要小于Dmax。相应器官D0.01 cc对应的剂量差值为（45.5±30.4） cGy，Dmax对应的剂量差值为（107.6±56.8） cGy。且除BRAINSTEM_PRV2外，D0.01 cc的剂量差值均小于100 cGy。 结论：用不同的剂量学算法计算同一个治疗计划，Dmax的差异要大于Dmean，体积越小，计算差异一般也越大。用D2代替Dmax可以显著降低计算算法间的差异。用D0.01 cc代替Dmax可以将计算误差显著降低。
Abstract:
 Objective To analyze the changes of plan evaluation results when calculating the dosimetry parameters with different algorithms. Methods The treatment plans designed by two different planning systems for 66 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were selected as the research objects. A self-developed evaluation software was adopted to read the dosimetry parameters of the plans, and these results were compared with those obtained with treatment planning system. Then the differences between D2 and Dmax were analyzed, and the feasibility of replacing Dmax with D0.01 cc was discussed. Results Differences between the dosimetry parameters read from Pinnacle and XiO system and the evaluation software were similar. With the reduced volume of the organs, the differences in Dmax and Dmean became larger, and the differences in Dmax were much greater. In all the plans, 5% of Dmax difference was higher than 292 cGy, and 5% of Dmean difference was higher than 55 cGy. Except for PTVnx, the mean value of the differences in D2 was less than Dmax. The dose difference was (45.5±30.4) cGy for D0.01 cc in related organs, and (107.6±56.8) cGy for Dmax. The dose differences of D0.01 cc were less than 100 cGy except for BRAINSTEM_PRV2. Conclusion When calculating the same treatment plan with different methods of dosimetry parameter computation, the differences in Dmax is greater than Dmean. The smaller the volume is, the larger the difference is. The use of D2 instead of Dmax can significantly reduce the difference in the calculation of dosimetry parameters, and replacing Dmax with D0.01 cc can significantly reduce the calculation errors.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈广涛,汪 淇,刘亚强,等.TrueBeam加速器射野准直器跟随功能在鼻咽癌固定野调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4865.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.005]
[2]潘宇辉,陈榕钦,柏朋刚,等.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗前后腮腺体积及空间几何位置变化研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.005]
[3]张俊俊,邱小平,李奇欣,等.ArcCheck系统在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.009]
[4]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[5]黄利生,庄婷婷,伍方财,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗Ib区剂量分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5265.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.010]
[6]易金玲,金献测,周永强,等.鼻咽癌IMRT与VMAT治疗的计划与剂量验证比较研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3859.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.006]
[7]金献测,易金玲,周永强,等.鼻咽癌同步加量调强放射治疗新的计划质量评估指标研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3978.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.004]
[8]蒋晓芹,段宝风,艾平,等.基于图谱库的自动轮廓勾画软件(ABAS)在鼻咽癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3997.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.008]
[9]张达光,蒋胜鹏,李智华,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗中解剖结构改变及剂量分布变化的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.006]
[10]杨海燕,王军良,周振山,等.AAA算法和PBC算法在鼻咽癌调强放疗中剂量分布的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4245.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-03-17
【作者简介】嵇卫星，硕士，助理工程师，主要研究方向：放射治疗技术，E-mail: ji.weixing@zs-hospital.sh.cn
【通信作者】张玉洁，博士，工程师，主要研究方向：机器学习与放疗计划自动化，E-mail: zhang.yujie@zs-hospital.sh.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-22