[1]吴骏翔,康盛伟,王培,等. 自动IMRT计划在宫颈癌术后放疗中的可行性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):394-398.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]
 WU Junxiang,KANG Shengwei,WANG Pei,et al.Feasibility of automatic planning in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):394-398.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]
点击复制

 自动IMRT计划在宫颈癌术后放疗中的可行性()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第4期
页码:
394-398
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-04-21

文章信息/Info

Title:
Feasibility of automatic planning in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients
文章编号:
1005-202X(2018)04-0394-05
作者:
吴骏翔康盛伟王培唐斌吴凡许敬辉黎杰
 四川省肿瘤医院/电子科技大学医学院附属肿瘤医院放疗中心, 四川 成都 610041
Author(s):
 WU Junxiang KANG Shengwei WANG Pei TANG Bin WU Fan XU Jinghui LI Jie
关键词:
 宫颈癌自动调强计划人工调强计划剂量学参数
Keywords:
cervical cancer automatic intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan manual intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan dosimetric parameters
分类号:
R815
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的:通过比较自动IMRT计划与人工IMRT计划的剂量学差异,探讨自动计划在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划设计中的可行性。 方法:使用飞利浦Pinnacle3 9.10计划系统的自动IMRT和人工IMRT方法分别对25例宫颈癌术后患者进行计划设计,比较2种计划得到的靶区和危及器官的剂量学参数、机器跳数、调试次数及计划设计时间。结果:自动和人工IMRT计划靶区的Dmean、D95、CI及HI等参数均无明显差异(P>0.05);自动IMRT计划得到的危及器官剂量学参数均优于人工IMRT计划,其中膀胱V40减少2.5%(P<0.05),直肠V40减少0.9%(P<0.05),骨V35减少2.8%(P<0.05),小肠V30减少4.2%(P<0.05),左侧股骨头V30减少5.2%(P<0.05)以及右侧股骨头V30减少5.5%(P<0.05);并且自动计划明显减少了计划调试次数,将人工IMRT计划的平均调试次数由3次减少到平均2次,计划设计时间由人工IMRT的69.5 min减少到42.7 min;但自动计划的平均跳数(1 042 MU)高于人工计划(931 MU)。结论:基于Pinnacle3的自动IMRT计划质量可以达到人工IMRT计划水平的同时,明显提高了计划设计效率,在宫颈癌术后的IMRT计划设计中具有可行性。
Abstract:
 Objective To investigate the feasibility of automatic intensity-modulated therapy (IMRT) planning for postoperative cervical cancer patients by comparing the dosimetric differences between automatic IMRT plan and manual IMRT plan. Methods The manual IMRT planning and automatic IMRT planning of Philips Pinnacle3 9.10 treatment planning system were used to design treatment plans for 25 cervical cancer patients. The dosimetric parameters of target areas and organs-at-risk, monitor unit, optimization times and planning time were compared between the two plans. Results No significant differences were found in the Dmean, D95, conformity index and homogeneity index of target areas between automatic and manual IMRT plans (P>0.05). Compared with manual IMRT plan, automatic IMRT plan showed better dosimetric parameters of organs-at-risk, having 2.5% reduction in bladder V40, 0.9% in rectum V40, 2.8% in bone V35, 4.2% in intestine V30, 5.2% in left femoral head V30 and 5.5% in right femoral head V30 (all P<0.05). Compared with manual IMRT plan, the automatic IMRT plan reduced the average optimization times from 3 times to 2 times and planning time from 69.5 min to 42.7 min. Moreover, the automatic IMRT plan had a higher monitor unit than manual IMRT plan (1 042 MU vs 931 MU). Conclusion Pinnacle3-based automatic IMRT planning is feasible in the IMRT planning for postoperative cervical cancer patients for automatic IMRT plan can significantly enhance efficiency and simultaneously improve plan quality.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[2]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[3]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[4]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[5]余 辉,张书旭.宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004]
[6]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[7]张富利,刘清智,张伟超,等.宫颈癌术后盆腔螺旋断层调强放疗两种计划设计方法的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4229.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.003]
[8]王佳浩,赖建军,唐荣军,等.结合EPID与EUD方法确定宫颈癌病例靶区最佳生物外放边界的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4378.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.009]
[9]张富利,刘清智,王雅棣,等.基于配置不同类型MLC叶片加速器的宫颈癌术后调强放疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4383.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.010]
[10]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(4):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
[11]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[12]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(4):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
[13]薛涛,刘光波,袁香坤,等. 宫颈癌近距离腔内放射治疗中膀胱和直肠ICRU参考点剂量和体积剂量受量比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(4):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
[14]侯灵通,汪志,陈志,等. 基于蒙特卡洛方法模拟不同膀胱充盈度对宫颈癌近距离放疗的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
 HOU Lingtong,WANG Zhi,CHEN Zhi,et al. Effects of different degrees of bladder filling on brachytherapy for cervical cancer based on Monte Carlo simulation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(4):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
[15]王占宇,谭军文,龙雨松,等. 非均整与均整模式下宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗计划的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
 WANG Zhanyu,TAN Junwen,LONG Yusong,et al. Dosimetric comparison of VMAT plans in different modes for cervical cancer: flatting filter free vs flattening filter[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(4):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
[16]刘礼东,杨振,邱小平,等. 利用Delta4对放疗计划进行剂量体积直方图评价的可行性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(1):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
 LIU Lidong,YANG Zhen,QIU Xiaoping,et al. Feasibility of Delta4 for plan evaluation based on dose-volume histogram[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
[17]牛瑞军,张晖,刘志强,等. 不同剂量算法在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划设计中的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
 NIU Ruijun,ZHANG Hui,et al. Different dose calculation algorithms applied in the design of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for postoperative patients with cervical cancer: a dosimetric analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
[18]梁有腾,余辉,张书旭. 基于3种配准方法的宫颈癌外照射放疗累积剂量研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
 LIANG Youteng,YU Hui,ZHANG Shuxu. Accumulated dose in external radiation for cervical cancer based on three registration methods[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
[19]唐世强,邱小平,陈文韬,等. 宫颈癌术后不同射野数调强放射治疗与四野三维适形放射治疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
 TANG Shiqiang,QIU Xiaoping,CHEN Wentao,et al. Different-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs four-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy following radical surgery for cervical carcinoma: a dosimetry comparison[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
[20]温列东,黄维,伍万春,等. 宫颈癌骨髓限量调强放疗对急性骨髓抑制的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):399.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.006]
 WEN Liedong,HUANG Wei,WU Wanchun,et al. Effect of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy on acute myelosuppression in patients with cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):399.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-02-15
【基金项目】四川省医学科研青年创新课题(Q16071)
【作者简介】吴骏翔,硕士研究生,实习研究员,研究方向:辐射物理与医学物理,E-mail: 506352702@qq.com
【通信作者】黎杰,研究员,E-mail: jie.li@yeah.net
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-23