[1]周湛明,徐慆,舒琦.乳腺癌锁骨上区不同放疗技术甲状腺剂量学比较及其对生存期和淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(2):143-147.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.003]
　ZHOU Zhanming,XU Tao,SHU Qi.Thyroid dosimetric comparison of different techniques for supraclavicular radiotherapy of breast cancer and their effects on survival time and lymphocyte subsets[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(2):143-147.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.003]
点击复制

乳腺癌锁骨上区不同放疗技术甲状腺剂量学比较及其对生存期和淋巴细胞亚群的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第2期
页码:
143-147
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-02-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Thyroid dosimetric comparison of different techniques for supraclavicular radiotherapy of breast cancer and their effects on survival time and lymphocyte subsets
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）02-0143-05
作者:
周湛明1; 徐慆1; 舒琦2
1.重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科， 重庆 400016； 2.重庆市人民医院三院院区肿瘤科， 重庆 400013
Author(s):
ZHOU Zhanming1;  XU Tao1;  SHU Qi2
1. Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China 2. Department of Oncology, Chongqing Peoples Hospital, Chongqing 400013, China
关键词:
乳腺癌; 锁骨上区; 调强放疗; 三维适形放疗; 甲状腺; 淋巴细胞亚群
Keywords:
Keywords: breast cancer supraclavicular region intensity-modulated radiotherapy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy thyroid lymphocyte subset
分类号:
R737.9；R815
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较乳腺癌锁骨上区不同放疗技术甲状腺剂量学特点，并对比其对患者生存期和淋巴细胞亚群的影响。方法：71例乳腺癌患者按照根治术后放疗方案分组，接受调强放疗（IMRT）者纳入IMRT组（n=37），接受三维适形放疗（3D-CRT）者纳入3D-CRT组（n=34）。比较两组患者计划靶区（PTV）剂量、甲状腺受量，放疗前后淋巴细胞亚群变化，以及5年无病生存率、总生存率，比较两种放疗技术甲状腺保护作用及其对患者预后的影响。结果：IMRT组Dmean、CI高于3D-CRT组，Dmax、HI低于3D-CRT组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。IMRT组甲状腺剂量体积V20、V30、V40高于3D-CRT组，Dmin、Dmean也高于3D-CRT组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组放疗后1 d淋巴细胞总数、B淋巴细胞百分比均较放疗前下降，CD3+、CD4+均较放疗前升高，3D-CRT组放疗后1 d淋巴细胞总数、B淋巴细胞百分比、CD3+、CD4+均高于IMRT组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。IMRT组失访3例、3D-CRT组失访1例，其余患者均获得有效随访，随访时间≥5年。IMRT组5年无病生存率、总生存率分别为47.06%（16/34）、73.53%（25/34），与3D-CRT组的51.52%（17/33）、78.79%（26/33）比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：IMRT的靶区剂量均匀性更佳，但甲状腺受量更高且患者放疗后淋巴细胞亚群变化更为明显；IMRT与3D-CRT对乳腺癌患者远期生存的影响无明显差异。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the thyroid dosimetric characteristics of different supraclavicular radiotherapy techniques for breast cancer, and to compare their effects on survival time and lymphocyte subsets. Methods According to the radiotherapy plan after radical mastectomy, 71 patients with breast cancer were divided into intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) group (n=37) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) group (n=34). The dose of planning target volume (PTV), thyroid dose, changes of lymphocyte subsets before and after radiotherapy, 5-year disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate were compared between two groups. Moreover, the thyroid-sparing effect of two radiotherapy technologies and their effects on the prognosis of patients were also compared. Results Compared with those in 3D-CRT group, the Dmean and CI of PTV in IMRT group were higher, while the Dmax and HI of PTV were lower, with statistical differences (P<0.05). Some dosimetric parameters (V20, V30, V40, Dmin and Dmean) of the thyroid in IMRT group were higher than those in 3D-CRT group, with statistical differences (P<0.05). After radiotherapy, the total number of lymphocytes and the percentage of B lymphocytes in the two groups were decreased, while CD3+ and CD4+ were increased. The total number of lymphocytes, the percentage of B lymphocytes, CD3+ and CD4+ in 3D-CRT group were higher than those in IMRT group on 1 day after radiotherapy, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Three cases were lost in IMRT group and 1 case in 3D-CRT group. The other patients were followed-up for more than 5 years. The differences between IMRT group and 3D-CRT group in 5-year disease-free survival rate ［47.06% (16/34) vs 51.52% (17/33)］ and overall survival rate ［73.53% (25/34) vs 78.79% (26/33)］ were trivial, without statistical difference (P>0.05). Conclusion IMRT has better target dose uniformity, but leads to higher thyroid dose and more obvious changes of lymphocyte subsets after radiotherapy. There is no significant difference between IMRT and 3D-CRT in the long-term survival of breast cancer patients.

相似文献/References:

[1]柏 晗,王 丽,刘旭红,等.左乳腺5种不同主野分布IMRT计划的剂量比较分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):210.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.013]
[2]张晋建,黎 静,文 婷,等.Arc CHECK在乳腺癌螺旋断层放疗计划剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.021]
[3]白 雪,杜向慧,王升晔,等.半野技术结合非共面照射技术在乳腺癌胸锁联合照射中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4849.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.001]
[4]赵永亮,储开岳,吴建亭,等.两种不同调强技术配合主动呼吸控制系统在乳腺癌放疗中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4862.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.004]
[5]花威,张西志,张先稳,等.RapidArc在乳腺癌术后放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3984.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.005]
[6]徐金济,成俊,李伟,等.左侧乳腺癌改良根治术后逆向调强放射治疗的摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4358.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.004]
[7]孟慧鹏,孙小喆,孙劲松,等.右乳腺癌术后放疗中VMAT和dIMRT的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4387.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.011]
[8]刘旭红,陈晓,艾毅钦,等.早期左乳腺癌保乳术后仰卧位和俯卧位照射剂量学比较与分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(05):737.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.028]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(2):737.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.028]
[9]张艺宝,吴昊,李莎,等.临床前验证与几何对比分析基于图谱库的危及器官自动勾画[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(2):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
[10]段云龙,杨涛,曲宝林,等.乳腺癌保乳切线野三维适形、切线野正向调强及逆向调强放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):841.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.017]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(2):841.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-09-18 【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（81402178） 【作者简介】周湛明，护师，E-mail: 278769557@qq.com 【通信作者】舒琦，主任医师，研究方向：肿瘤防治，E-mail: shuqi_cq@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-02