[1]马天斌,蒋振东,俞海东,等.两种准直器宽度对鼻咽癌放疗中的剂量学差异影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(3):302-307.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.006]
　MA Tianbin,JIANG Zhendong,YU Haidong,et al.Multileaf collimators of two different leaf widths in radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(3):302-307.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.006]
点击复制

两种准直器宽度对鼻咽癌放疗中的剂量学差异影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第3期
页码:
302-307
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Multileaf collimators of two different leaf widths in radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）03-0302-06
作者:
马天斌; 蒋振东; 俞海东; 张汉雄; 胡丹; 陈意标
梅州市人民医院（黄塘医院）放射治疗室， 广东 梅州 514031
Author(s):
MA Tianbin;  JIANG Zhendong;  YU Haidong;  ZHANG Hanxiong;  HU Dan;  CHEN Yibiao
Department of Radiation Oncology, Meizhou Peoples Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou 514031, China
关键词:
鼻咽癌; 多叶准直器; 适形度指数; 均匀性指数
Keywords:
Keywords: nasopharynx cancer multileaf collimator conformal index homogeneity index
分类号:
R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：研究两种规格（等中心处投影0.5和1.0 cm）多叶准直器（MLC）在鼻咽癌调强放射治疗（IMRT）计划中的区别，从剂量学方面探究MLC的宽度对患者靶区和危及器官的影响。方法：随机选取已完成治疗的31例鼻咽癌患者计划，在放疗处方和物理优化参数不变的情况下分别使用两种规格MLC的加速器射野模型进行重新优化计算，统计靶区及主要危及器官的体积剂量、平均剂量（Dmean）、适形度指数（CI）、均匀性指数（HI）等参数，分析其差异性。结果：全样本分析显示，所有靶区HI和部分靶区（PGTVnx、PCTV2）CI差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），0.5 cm MLC优于1.0 cm MLC；危及器官中，右侧视神经和视交叉最大剂量（Dmax）、左侧颞叶和右侧颞颌关节Dmean、左右腮腺V30、气管和脊髓Dmean差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），0.5 cm MLC优于1.0 cm MLC，其他危及器官无统计学差异（P>0.05）；在Pinnacle3和Monaco计划系统中得到了相似结果，两种MLC在靶区适形度和均匀性方面及部分危及器官受量差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：0.5 cm MLC在鼻咽癌调强计划中能有效提高靶区适形度和均匀性，也能有效降低部分危及器官受量，可以更好地保护与靶区邻近或有重叠的一些危及器官，推荐有条件的医院使用。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study the dosimetric differences between multileaf collimators (MLC) of different leaf widths (projected 0.5 cm leaf width and 1.0 cm leaf width at the isocenter) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and to explore the dosimetric effect of the leaf width of MLC on target areas and organs-at-risk. Methods The treatment plans of 31 randomly selected NPC cases in Meizhou Peoples Hospital (Huangtang Hospital) were re-optimized by accelerator beam models using MLC of different leaf widths under the condition of unchanged radiotherapy prescription and physical optimization parameters. The dosimetric parameters of target areas and main organs-at-risk, such as dose volume parameters, mean dose, conformity index and homogeneity index, were analyzed for discussing the dosimetric differences between 0.5 cm MLC and 1.0 cm MLC. Results The analysis of the whole sample showed that the homogeneity index of all target areas and the conformity index of some target areas (PGTVnx, PCTV2) in treatment plans using 0.5 cm MLC were better than those in treatment plans using 1.0 cm MLC, with statistical differences (P<0.05). No significant difference between 0.5 cm MLC and 1.0 cm MLC was found in the dosimetric parameters of organs-at-risk (P>0.05), except for some dosimetric parameters which were significantly lower in treatment plans using 0.5 cm MLC (P<0.05), including the maximum doses of right optic nerve and optic chiasm, the mean dose of left temporal lobe and right temporomandibular joint, the V30 of right and left parotid glands, and the mean dose of trachea and spinal cord. Similar results were obtained in both Pinnacle3 and Monaco planning systems, and there were statistically significant differences between 0.5 cm MLC and 1.0 cm MLC in target dose conformation and homogeneity, as well as dose delivered to some organs-at-risk (P<0.05). Conclusion In intensity-modulated radiotherapy of NPC, 0.5 cm MLC can effectively improve target dose conformation and homogeneity, and also can significantly reduce the dose delivered to some organs-at-risk, so as to better protect some organs-at-risk adjacent to or overlapping with target areas. Therefore, 0.5 cm MLC is recommended to be used in qualified hospitals.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈炳周,路俊哲,侯 氢.不同设计方式的调强逆向治疗计划比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):391.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.020]
[2]陈广涛,汪 淇,刘亚强,等.TrueBeam加速器射野准直器跟随功能在鼻咽癌固定野调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4865.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.005]
[3]潘宇辉,陈榕钦,柏朋刚,等.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗前后腮腺体积及空间几何位置变化研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.005]
[4]张俊俊,邱小平,李奇欣,等.ArcCheck系统在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.009]
[5]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[6]黄利生,庄婷婷,伍方财,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗Ib区剂量分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5265.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.010]
[7]易金玲,金献测,周永强,等.鼻咽癌IMRT与VMAT治疗的计划与剂量验证比较研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3859.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.006]
[8]金献测,易金玲,周永强,等.鼻咽癌同步加量调强放射治疗新的计划质量评估指标研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3978.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.004]
[9]蒋晓芹,段宝风,艾平,等.基于图谱库的自动轮廓勾画软件(ABAS)在鼻咽癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3997.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.008]
[10]王矫健,徐利明,全红,等.多叶准直器叶片到位偏差对调强放射治疗剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(03):4121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.03.009]
[11]叶淑敏,滕建建,石锦平,等. MLC叶片系统误差对鼻咽癌VMAT和IMRT计划剂量影响的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(10):1139.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.005]
　YE Shumin,TENG Jianjian,SHI Jinping,et al. Comparison of dosimetric impacts of MLC systematic errors on VMAT and IMRT plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(3):1139.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-09-12 【基金项目】梅州市科技计划项目（2016B020） 【作者简介】马天斌，主管技师，主要从事肿瘤放射物理工作，E-mail: wenbinbin04@126.com 【通信作者】蒋振东，副主任技师，主要从事肿瘤放射物理、放疗质控技术等工作，E-mail: jiangchenyu0512@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-30