[1]解传滨,徐寿平,戴相昆,等.应用肝分区评估法对不同铅门模式门脉癌栓螺旋断层放疗剂量学特性分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(7):803-809.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.07.002]
　XIE Chuanbin,XU Shouping,DAI Xiangkun,et al.Liver segment-based assessment of dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus under different jaw modes[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(7):803-809.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.07.002]
点击复制

应用肝分区评估法对不同铅门模式门脉癌栓螺旋断层放疗剂量学特性分析()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第7期
页码:
803-809
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Liver segment-based assessment of dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus under different jaw modes
文章编号:
R735.7；R811.1
作者:
解传滨; 徐寿平; 戴相昆; 陈高翔; 葛瑞刚; 巩汉顺; 曲宝林
中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心放疗科， 北京 100853
Author(s):
XIE Chuanbin;  XU Shouping;  DAI Xiangkun;  CHEN Gaoxiang;  GE Ruigang;  GONG Hanshun;  QU Baolin
Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
关键词:
螺旋断层放疗; 铅门模式; 门脉癌栓; 肝脏分区法; 剂量学特性
Keywords:
Keywords: helical tomotherapy jaw mode portal vein tumor thrombus liver segment dosimetric characteristic
分类号:
R735.7；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.07.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：应用肝脏分区评估的方法探究不同铅门模式下门脉癌栓螺旋断层放射治疗的剂量学特性。方法：选取12例门脉癌栓患者，根据靶区与肝脏解剖关系将肝脏超出靶区上缘部分定义为肝上区（Lsup），超出靶区下缘部分定义为肝下区（Linf），中间部分定义为肝中区（Lmid）。分别设计射野宽度（FW）为1.0、2.5、5.0 cm 3组静态铅门（FJ）计划（F1.0、F2.5、F5.0）及FW为2.5、5.0 cm 2组动态铅门（DJ）计划（D2.5、D5.0）。分析比较各计划组靶区、各危及器官剂量学差异并评估各计划实施效率。结果：5组计划得到近乎相当的靶区剂量分布。在相同FW情况下，DJ能显著降低全肝受照剂量，并且可以达到与比之小一档FW静态计划近乎相当的水平。而FW同为2.5、5.0 cm两种情况下，DJ计划较FJ计划的Lsup平均剂量分别降低35.5%、51.3%，而Lmid平均剂量变化较小。在各铅门模式下，随着FW的增加Lsup受照剂量显著增加，而Lmid受照剂量虽表现出略有增加的趋势，但无统计学意义。计划实施时间随FW增大而明显增加，相同FW下DJ计划机架旋转周期及计划实施时间均有一定程度的增加。结论：DJ技术可有效降低由于FW增加而引起的靶区纵向边缘剂量延伸，进而提高靶区纵向边缘的剂量梯度，可在纵轴方向上对肝脏等危及器官和正常组织的受照剂量起到显著的降低作用。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To explore the dosimetric characteristics of helical tomotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus under different jaw modes by liver segment-based assessment. Methods Twelve patients with portal vein tumor thrombus were enrolled in the study. According to the anatomical relationship between the target area and the liver, the liver was divided into 3 parts, namely Lsup which was defined by the part beyond the superior edge of the target area, Linf which was defined by the part beyond the inferior edge of the target area, and Lmid which was defined by the middle part. Three groups of fixed jaw (FJ) plans with the field width (FW) of 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 cm, respectively, were designed and defined as F1.0, F2.5 and F5.0 and two groups of dynamic jaw (DJ) plans with FW of 2.5 and 5.0 cm were designed and defined as D2.5 and D5.0. The dosimetric differences of the target area and organs-at-risk were analyzed and compared among different groups, and the delivery efficiency was also evaluated. Results The dose distributions in the target area were similar in 5 groups. With the same FW, DJ plans reduced the irradiation dose of the whole liver significantly and obtained the result that was close to that of FJ plans with smaller FW. When FW were 2.5 and 5.0 cm, the mean dose of Lsup in DJ plans was decreased by 35.5% and 51.3% as compared with that of FJ plans, but the mean dose of Lmid varied slightly. The irradiation dose of Lsup increased obviously with the increase of FW under each jaw mode, while the irradiation dose of Lmid showed a trend of slight increase, and there were no statistical significance. The delivery time was increased significantly with the increase of FW. With the same FW, the gantry periods and delivery time of DJ plans were increased. Conclusion DJ technique can be used to not only effectively reduce the dose extension along the longitudinal edge of the target area due to the increase of FW, thereby increasing the corresponding dose gradient, but also significantly decrease the irradiation doses of normal tissues and organs-at-risk such as liver.

相似文献/References:

[1]张富利,王雅棣,许卫东,等.应用两种三维探测器阵列进行螺旋断层调强放疗计划剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):218.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.015]
[2]巩汉顺,王金媛,丛小虎,等.晚期胰腺癌适形、简化调强及螺旋断层放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.003]
[3]朱夫海,吴伟章,王 勇,等.肺癌螺旋断层放疗计划设计的初步研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4979.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.002]
[4]张富利,蒋华勇,王雅棣,等.应用一维、二维、三维探测器阵列进行螺旋断层调强放疗计划剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.002]
[5]朱夫海,吴伟章,王勇,等.胰腺癌患者螺旋断层放疗摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(06):4480.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.06.003]
[6]刘清智,蒋华勇,许卫东,等.胸膜间皮瘤螺旋断层调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(05):690.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.017]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(7):690.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.017]
[7]黄栋,田晓云,刘海,等.鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗MegaVoltage CT引导下摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(2):204.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.02.020]
[8]徐艳红,张晋建,黎静,等.影像增强剂对脑瘤螺旋断层放疗剂量计算的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(8):757.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.08.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):757.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.08.001]
[9]王志伟,段继梅,岳麒,等.螺距和调制因子在螺旋断层放疗计划优化中的作用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(1):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.01.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(7):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.01.004]
[10]王为,蒋马伟,沈奕晨,等. 螺旋断层放射治疗在儿童神经母细胞瘤全颅骨放疗中保护海马的计划设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(10):977.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(7):977.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-01-05 【基金项目】国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心（NCRCG-PLAGH-2018003）；军队项目（LB20191A060026）；国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0112100） 【作者简介】解传滨，硕士，副主任技师、物理师，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: xiechuanbin301@163.com 【通信作者】曲宝林，博士，主任医师，副教授，研究方向：肺癌、儿童肿瘤、血液系统肿瘤的精准放疗，E-mail: qubl6212@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-28