[1]姚苗苗,蔡思清,黄雪清,等. 乳腺三维断层摄影与乳腺彩超在乳腺疾病诊断中的效能对比[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1430-1435.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.012]
　YAO Miaomiao,CAI Siqing,HUANG Xueqing,et al. Comparison of the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis and color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast diseases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(12):1430-1435.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.012]
点击复制

 乳腺三维断层摄影与乳腺彩超在乳腺疾病诊断中的效能对比()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第12期
页码:
1430-1435
栏目:
医学影像物理
出版日期:
2018-12-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis and color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast diseases
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）12-1430-06
作者:
 姚苗苗; 蔡思清; 黄雪清; 吴培丽; 颜建湘; 蔡冬鹭; 黄美铃; 林鲤玲
 福建医科大学第二临床医学院影像学教研室， 福建 泉州 362001
Author(s):
 YAO Miaomiao;  CAI Siqing;  HUANG Xueqing;  WU Peili;  YAN Jianxiang;  CAI Donglu;  HUANG Meiling;  LIN Liling
 Department of Imaging, the Second Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362001, China
关键词:
 ; 数字乳腺三维断层技术; 彩超; 乳腺影像报告和数据系统; 乳腺疾病; 诊断效能
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: digital breast tomosynthesis;  color Doppler ultrasound;  breast imaging reporting and data system;  breast disease;  diagnostic efficacy
分类号:
R445.4
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 【摘 要】 目的：研究数字乳腺三维断层技术（DBT）和乳腺超声在诊断乳腺病变效能的不同以及联合应用对于乳腺诊断的价值。 方法：收集1 065例乳腺病变患者，其中333例有完整的病理检查资料。以乳腺影像报告和数据系统（BI-RADS）分类为标准，分析DBT、超声、DBT+超声在乳腺病变诊断中的分布差异。根据333例病理结果，比较3种诊断模式的诊断效能。 结果：DBT与超声的BI-RADS分布有显着性差异（P=0.001），DBT与DBT+超声或超声与DBT+超声的BI-RADS分布无显著性差异（P=0.258, 0.394）。3种诊断模式均可明显区分恶性和良性乳腺病变（P<0.001）。多组独立样本Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验分析显示3种诊断模型存在差异（[χ2]=14.982, P=0.001）。DBT的特异性、误诊率、准确性和阳性预测值明显优于超声。超声显示囊性病变优于DBT，且超声对确定良性肿块的敏感性优于DBT。DBT+超声的特异性为99.5％，误诊率为0.5%，阳性预测值也达到99%。DBT+超声的检查模式优于单独使用DBT或超声。 结论：与单独的DBT或超声相比，DBT和超声的组合可以提高乳腺病变的诊断效能。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), color Doppler ultrasound, and DBT+color Doppler ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Methods Among the 1 065 patients with breast lesions enrolled in this study, 333 cases had complete pathological examination data. Using breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification as the criterion, the distribution differences among DBT, ultrasound, and DBT+ultrasound in diagnosis of breast lesions were analyzed. Based on the pathological results of 333 cases, the diagnostic efficacies of 3 diagnostic models were compared. Results There were significant differences in BI-RADS distribution between DBT and ultrasound (P=0.001), and no significant differences were found between DBT and DBT+ultrasound or between ultrasound and DBT+ultrasound (P=0.258, 0.394). All 3 diagnostic models distinctly discriminated the malignant and benign breast lesions (all P<0.001). The analysis with multi-group independent-sample Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there were differences among 3 diagnostic models ([χ2]=14.982, P=0.001). DBT was superior to ultrasound in the specificity, misdiagnosis rate, accuracy and positive predictive value. Ultrasound was better than DBT in displaying the cystic lesions, and the sensitivity of ultrasound in determining benign masses was higher than that of DBT. The specificity, misdiagnosis rate and positive predictive value of DBT+ultrasound were 99.5%, 0.5% and 99%, respectively. The combined use of DBT and ultrasound was better than using DBT or ultrasound alone in the diagnosis of breast diseases. Conclusion Compared with using DBT or ultrasound alone, the combination of DBT and ultrasound can improve the diagnostic efficacy of breast lesions.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(12):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-06-24
【基金项目】福建省卫生计生委医药卫生科技创新项目（2015-CX-28）
【作者简介】姚苗苗，研究方向：乳腺放射诊断，E-mail: 1924400951@-
qq.com
【通信作者】蔡思清，副教授，主任医生，研究方向：乳腺放射诊断，E-mail: 1920455696@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-26