[1]纪天龙,赵晶,李权,等. 驻留时间离差限制参数对三维后装计划的影响分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(8):900-904.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.007]
 JI Tianlong,ZHAO Jing,LI Quan,et al. Effects of dwell time deviation constraint parameters on three-dimensional afterloading plan[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):900-904.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.007]
点击复制

 驻留时间离差限制参数对三维后装计划的影响分析()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第8期
页码:
900-904
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effects of dwell time deviation constraint parameters on three-dimensional afterloading plan
文章编号:
1005-202X(2018)08-0900-05
作者:
 纪天龙赵晶李权李光
 中国医科大学附属第一医院放疗科, 辽宁 沈阳 110001
Author(s):
 JI Tianlong ZHAO Jing LI Quan LI Guang
 Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
关键词:
 宫颈癌近距离治疗模拟退火驻留时间离差限制参数三维后装
Keywords:
 cervical cancer brachytherapy simulated annealing dwell time deviation constraint parameters three-dimensional afterloading
分类号:
R737.3
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的:研究驻留时间离差限制(DTDC)参数对三维后装计划的影响。 方法:选取在中国医科大学附属第一医院治疗的30例妇科肿瘤患者计划,施源器为Fletcher单独宫腔管、全部三管和阴道施源器,每例患者治疗前扫描CT,并由医生勾画靶区和危及器官,以0.1步进修改DTDC参数,由DTDC=0到DTDC=1共制定11个计划,归一至DTDC=0时计划下相应的数值。比较CTV的V150、V200,膀胱、直肠的D2cc,驻留时间总和,计划调制指数,分析DTDC参数的修改对三维后装计划的影响。 结果:随着DTDC的增加,阴道施源器,Fletcher施源器单独宫腔管和全部三管使用时,CTV的V150和V200分别升高至105%和109%、102%和104%以及115%和120%,直肠和膀胱的D2cc分别至101%和102%、99%和99%以及115%和101%;总驻留时间分别达到DTDC=0时的96%、97%和104%。 结论:宫颈癌三维后装计划的制定针对不同的施源器应该选用合适的DTDC参数,给予患者更加合理治疗计划。
Abstract:
 Objective To study the effects of dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameters on three-dimensional (3D) afterloading plan. Methods Fifteen patients with gynecologic tumors who were treated in the First Hospital of China Medical University were enrolled in this study. The source device was a single intrauterine tube of Fletcher applicator, all 3 tubes of Fletcher applicator and vaginal applicator. Each patient was scanned by CT before treatment, and the target areas and organs-at-risk were delineated by doctors. DTDC parameters were modified in the step of 0.1. A total of 11 plans were developed from DTDC=0 to DTDC=1, and the plans were normalized to DTDC=0 plan to obtain the corresponding values. The V150, V200 of CTV, D2cc of bladder and rectum, total dwell time, planned modulation indexes were compared, and the effects of DTDC parameter modification on 3D afterloading plan were analyzed. Results When using vaginal applicator, a single intrauterine tube of Fletcher applicator, all 3 tubes of Fletcher applicator, with the increase of DTDC, the V150 and V200 of CTV were increased to 105% and 109%, 102% and 104%, 115% and 120%, respectively; and the D2cc in rectum and bladder were increased/decreased to 101% and 102%, 99% and 99% , 115% and 101%, respectively. The total dwell time of DTDC=1 plan using vaginal applicator, a single intrauterine tube of Fletcher applicator and 3 tubes of Fletcher applicator reached 96%, 97% and 104% of that in DTDC=0 plan, respectively. Conclusion To provide a more reasonable treatment plans for patients, the optimal DTDC parameters should be selected based on different source devices used in 3D afterloading plan for cervical cancer.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[2]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[3]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[4]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[5]余 辉,张书旭.宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004]
[6]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[7]张富利,刘清智,张伟超,等.宫颈癌术后盆腔螺旋断层调强放疗两种计划设计方法的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4229.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.003]
[8]王佳浩,赖建军,唐荣军,等.结合EPID与EUD方法确定宫颈癌病例靶区最佳生物外放边界的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4378.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.009]
[9]张富利,刘清智,王雅棣,等.基于配置不同类型MLC叶片加速器的宫颈癌术后调强放疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4383.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.010]
[10]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(8):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
[11]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[12]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像装置在宫颈癌剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):230.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.003]
[13]薛涛,刘光波,袁香坤,等. 宫颈癌近距离腔内放射治疗中膀胱和直肠ICRU参考点剂量和体积剂量受量比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):897.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.008]
[14]侯灵通,汪志,陈志,等. 基于蒙特卡洛方法模拟不同膀胱充盈度对宫颈癌近距离放疗的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
 HOU Lingtong,WANG Zhi,CHEN Zhi,et al. Effects of different degrees of bladder filling on brachytherapy for cervical cancer based on Monte Carlo simulation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):1096.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.004]
[15]王占宇,谭军文,龙雨松,等. 非均整与均整模式下宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗计划的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
 WANG Zhanyu,TAN Junwen,LONG Yusong,et al. Dosimetric comparison of VMAT plans in different modes for cervical cancer: flatting filter free vs flattening filter[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):1110.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.007]
[16]刘礼东,杨振,邱小平,等. 利用Delta4对放疗计划进行剂量体积直方图评价的可行性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(1):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
 LIU Lidong,YANG Zhen,QIU Xiaoping,et al. Feasibility of Delta4 for plan evaluation based on dose-volume histogram[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):25.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.006]
[17]牛瑞军,张晖,刘志强,等. 不同剂量算法在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划设计中的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
 NIU Ruijun,ZHANG Hui,et al. Different dose calculation algorithms applied in the design of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for postoperative patients with cervical cancer: a dosimetric analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):145.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.005]
[18]梁有腾,余辉,张书旭. 基于3种配准方法的宫颈癌外照射放疗累积剂量研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
 LIANG Youteng,YU Hui,ZHANG Shuxu. Accumulated dose in external radiation for cervical cancer based on three registration methods[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.006]
[19]唐世强,邱小平,陈文韬,等. 宫颈癌术后不同射野数调强放射治疗与四野三维适形放射治疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
 TANG Shiqiang,QIU Xiaoping,CHEN Wentao,et al. Different-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs four-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy following radical surgery for cervical carcinoma: a dosimetry comparison[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):183.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.012]
[20]吴骏翔,康盛伟,王培,等. 自动IMRT计划在宫颈癌术后放疗中的可行性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):394.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]
 WU Junxiang,KANG Shengwei,WANG Pei,et al.Feasibility of automatic planning in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):394.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2018-02-27
【作者简介】纪天龙,硕士研究生,工程师,研究方向:肿瘤放射物理学,E-mail: 18040095029@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-26