[1]胡晓伟,史玉静,李金凯,等. 共面与非共面的VMAT在肺癌放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(11):1246-1251.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.002]
 HU Xiaowei,SHI Yujing,LI Jinkai,et al. Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):1246-1251.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.002]
点击复制

 共面与非共面的VMAT在肺癌放疗中的剂量学比较()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第11期
页码:
1246-1251
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-11-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X(2018)11-1246-06
作者:
 胡晓伟1史玉静1李金凯2成红艳2孙新臣2顾宵寰2
 1.南京医科大学特种医学系, 江苏 南京 210009; 2.南京医科大学第一附属医院放疗科, 江苏 南京 210009
Author(s):
 HU Xiaowei1 SHI Yujing1 LI Jinkai2 CHENG Hongyan2 SUN Xinchen2 GU Xiaohuan2
 1. Department of Special Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China; 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
关键词:
 肺癌非共面容积调强立体定向放射治疗
Keywords:
 Keywords: lung cancer non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy stereotactic body radiotherapy
分类号:
R312;R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的:探讨共面与非共面的容积调强(VMAT)技术在中央型肺癌和周围型肺癌中的剂量学差异。 方法:选择14例单一病灶的肺癌患者,其中7例为中央型肺癌、7例为周围型肺癌,分别制定共面的VMAT计划以及非共面的VMAT计划。比较两种计划的靶区适形指数(CI)、均匀性指数(HI)和梯度指数(GI);危及器官比较:双肺V1、V2.5、V5、V20、Dmean,健侧肺V1和V5,心脏Dmean,食管Dmean,脊髓Dmax,胸壁V30及Dmean。 结果:对于靶区GI、胸壁V30和双肺V20,非共面的VMAT计划均要好于共面的VMAT计划。在中央型肺癌中,差异更加明显,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。双肺及健侧肺的V1中,非共面的VMAT计划高于共面的VMAT计划(P<0.05)。对于心脏Dmean,非共面VMAT计划高于共面的计划,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。非共面VMAT计划的机器跳数高于共面的VMAT计划(P<0.05)。 结论:非共面的VMAT计划较共面的VAMT计划剂量梯度更陡,对于保护胸壁和肺更有优势,在中央型肺癌中更加明显。本研究结果为肺癌的计划设计提供了一种新思路。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To investigate the dosimetric differences between coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in treatment of central type lung cancer and peripheral lung cancer. Methods A total of 14 patients with single lesion of lung cancer, including 7 cases of central type lung cancer and 7 cases of peripheral lung cancer, were selected. Two plans, namely coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT plans, were designed for each patient. The conformity index, homogeneity index and gradient index of target areas were compared, and several indexes of organs-at-risk, including the V1, V2.5, V5, V20, Dmean of lungs, the V1, V5 of contralateral lung, the Dmean of heart, the Dmean of esophagus, the Dmax of spinal cord, and the Dmax, V30 of chest wall, were also compared. Results The gradient index of target areas, the V30 of chest wall, and the V20 of lungs in non-coplanar VMAT plan were superior to those in coplanar VMAT plan, and the differences were more obvious in patients with central type lung cancer, with statistical significances (P<0.05). The V1 of bilateral lungs and contralateral lung was higher in non-coplanar VMAT plan than in coplanar VMAT plan (P<0.05), and the Dmean of heart in non-coplanar VMAT plans was higher than that in coplanar VMAT plans, without any statistical differences (P>0.05). Moreover, the number of monitor units in non-coplanar VMAT plan was higher than that in coplanar VMAT plan (P<0.05). Conclusion Non-coplanar VMAT plan has a steeper dose gradient than coplanar VAMT plan, which is more advantageous for the protection of the chest wall and lung, especially for patients with central type lung cancer, providing a new idea for designing treatment plans of lung cancer.

相似文献/References:

[1]史贵连,叶福丽.肺癌调强放疗计划的设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.013]
[2]朱夫海,吴伟章,王 勇,等.肺癌螺旋断层放疗计划设计的初步研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4979.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.002]
[3]翁邓胡,王 建,尹中明,等.基于锥形束CT研究肺癌图像引导放疗的内靶区外放边界值[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):5012.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.009]
[4]彭莹莹,张书旭,谭剑明,等.基于PCNN的PET/CT图像分割在肺癌靶区勾画中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):5022.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.011]
[5]王 涛,王运来.基于4D-CT和Mimics软件模拟分析肺癌肿瘤的呼吸运动规律[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5132.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.008]
[6]周 琼,周剑良,张一戈,等.基于锥形束CT肺癌放射治疗两种体位固定技术摆位误差的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5258.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.008]
[7]张矛,金海国,苏清秀,等.肺癌静态调强与容积旋转调强放射治疗间比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4364.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.006]
[8]罗焕丽,靳富,王颖,等.肿瘤放疗中体外误差与体内误差的关联性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(1):10.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):10.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.003]
[9]王琳婧,张书旭,袁克虹,等.基于图像变形配准的肺癌自适应放疗剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(1):16.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.004]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):16.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.004]
[10]李政良,等.4DCT下肺癌大体肿瘤的变化及相关因素分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(2):208.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.02.021]
[11]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[12]黄啸天,张俊,周云峰,等. 方差分析法在肺癌立体定向放射治疗摆位误差及计划靶区外放边界中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):579.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.008]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(11):579.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.008]
[13]雷伟杰,曹瑞芬,贾婧,等. 基于几何不确定性鲁棒性优化在肺癌容积旋转调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.001]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(11):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.001]
[14]刘致滨,石锦平,张利文,等. Acuros XB与AAA算法在肺癌调强放疗计划设计中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(10):984.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(11):984.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.003]
[15]龙雨松,谭军文,贺先桃,等. 肺癌固定剂量率旋转调强和容积旋转调强的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):176.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.011]
 LONG Yusong,TAN Junwen,HE Xiantao,et al. Dosimetric analysis of intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy with fixed dose rate versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):176.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.011]
[16]张彦秋,韩阿蒙,李金旺,等. 容积旋转调强放射治疗肺癌患者放射性肺炎发生的相关因素分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(7):771.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.006]
 ZHANG Yanqiu,HAN Ameng,LI Jinwang,et al. Analysis of factors predicting radiation pneumonitis in volumetric modulated arc therapy of lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):771.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.006]
[17]李玉成,陈维军,单国平,等. 摆位误差对立体定向放射治疗计划剂量学验证的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(8):869.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.001]
 LI Yucheng,CHEN Weijun,et al. Effects of setup errors on dosimetric verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy plan[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):869.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.001]
[18]王警建,李娜,王龙龙,等. 能谱CT鉴别肺部炎性病变和肺癌的临床价值[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(10):1164.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.10.010]
 WANG Jingjian,LI Na,WANG Longlong,et al. Clinical value of energy spectrum CT for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary inflammatory lesion and lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):1164.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.10.010]
[19]孙晓欢,谭丽娜,王中飞,等. 肺癌立体定向体部放疗以靶区为准进行锥形束CT在线配准的可行性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(3):282.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.03.007]
 SUN Xiaohuan,TAN Lina,WANG Zhongfei,et al. Feasibility of CBCT online registration by target areas in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(11):282.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.03.007]
[20]王毅,赖清泉,黄美铃,等. 磁共振体素内不相干运动在肺良恶性肿瘤的诊断效能及肺癌化疗疗效评估的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(6):682.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.012]
 WANG Yi,LAI Qingquan,HUANG Meiling,et al. Application of MR-IVIM in the diagnosis of benign and malignant lung tumors and the evaluation of chemotherapeutic efficacy in lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(11):682.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-05-12
【基金项目】国家自然科学基金(81472809, 81502653, 81672983, 81703028)
【作者简介】胡晓伟,硕士,研究方向:医学物理,E-mail:2424805446@qq.com
【通信作者】顾宵寰,物理师,研究方向:医学物理学,E-mail: 15751886651@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-22