[1]贺睿敏,邱小平,杨振,等.多重标准计划质量评价系统在直肠癌中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(9):1017-1021.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.09.005]
　HE Ruimin,QIU Xiaoping,YANG Zhen,et al.Application of multi-criteria plan quality assessment system in rectal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(9):1017-1021.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.09.005]
点击复制

多重标准计划质量评价系统在直肠癌中的应用()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第9期
页码:
1017-1021
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-09-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of multi-criteria plan quality assessment system in rectal cancer
文章编号:
R735.37
作者:
贺睿敏1; 邱小平1; 杨振2; 曹瑛2; 杨晓喻2; 肖浩3
1.南华大学，湖南衡阳421001；2.中南大学湘雅医院肿瘤科，湖南长沙410008；3. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院，广东广州510000
Author(s):
HE Ruimin1;  QIU Xiaoping1;  YANG Zhen2;  CAO Ying2;  YANG Xiaoyu2;  XIAO Hao3
1. Nanhua University, Hengyang 421001, China; 2. Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; 3. Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
关键词:
直肠癌; 调强放射治疗; 旋转调强放射治疗; 计划质量度量标准
分类号:
1005-202X（2018）09-1017-05
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.09.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：使用一种自动计划评估软件系统，以该评估系统分析两种技术在直肠癌病例中的剂量学差异，为完善自动 计划流程建立基础。方法：选取20例已批准的临床直肠癌计划，其中10例应用调强放射治疗（IMRT）技术，10例应用旋 转调强放射治疗（Rapid arc）技术。将病人计划数据导入PlanIQ软件，将RTOG协议和TG报告文件作为参考，创建多重计 划质量度量标准，标准包括靶区覆盖率，均匀性指数，适形度指数，股骨头、小肠、膀胱等危及器官的剂量学指标，将计划质 量度量标准整合建立一个直肠癌计划质量评价系统。利用建立好的评估评价系统分别对两组病例进行评价打分，并进行 相应的剂量学参数对比。结果：对比两种技术的剂量学参数，Rapid arc病例组靶区覆盖率和剂量热点要优于IMRT组，剂 量学差异均有统计学意义。Rapid arc组除小肠外的危及器官受量要优于IMRT组，其中小肠V45、Dmax，股骨头V40、Dmax，膀 胱V40、V45差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组靶区均匀性指数和适形度指数差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。最终通过质量 评估系统得出的总分数，Rapid arc优于IMRT，且得分差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：多重标准计划质量评估系统 能有效地对计划进行评价，减少计划审查的工作量，可为自动计划的数据库提供优质的数据源。
Abstract:
Keywords: rectal cancer; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Rapid arc; plan quality meObjective To analyze the dosimetric differences between two techniques for rectal cancer with an automatic plan assessment system, and to establish a basis for refining the automatic planning process. Methods Twenty cases of rectal cancer were selected. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique was applied in 10 cases and Rapid Arc technique in the other 10 cases. The planning data of patients were imported into PlanIQ software to create plan quality metrics based on RTOG protocol and TG report files. The criterions included target coverage, homogeneity index, conformity index, and the dosimetric indicators of femoral head, small intestine, bladder and other organs-at-risk. After the integration of plan quality metrics, a rectal cancer plan quality assessment system was established. The established assessment system was used to score each criterion and compare the corresponding dosimetric parameters. Results The target coverage and hot spot in Rapid arc group were better than those in IMRT group, with statistical significance. The organs-at-risk sparing in Rapid arc group was superior to IMRT group except small intestine, and the differences in the V45, Dmaxof small intestine, the V40, Dmax of femoral head, and the V40, V45 of bladder were statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in homogeneity index and conformity index (P>0.05). According to the final scores obtained by quality assessment system, Rapid arc was proved to be better than IMRT, and the differences in scores were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Multi-criteria plan quality assessment system can effectively evaluate programs, reduce the workload of program reviews, and provide a good source of data for the databases of automatic planning.trics

相似文献/References:

[1]史贵连,叶福丽.PTW729二维矩阵的平面剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.020]
[2]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[3]巩汉顺,王金媛,丛小虎,等.晚期胰腺癌适形、简化调强及螺旋断层放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.003]
[4]曾 彪,张九堂,席许平,等.单中心上下半野技术在胸中上段食管癌放射治疗中的剂量学分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):357.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.012]
[5]史贵连,叶福丽.肺癌调强放疗计划的设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.013]
[6]陈炳周,路俊哲,侯 氢.不同设计方式的调强逆向治疗计划比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):391.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.020]
[7]周 钢,田 野,陆雪官,等.同步加量技术应用于脑胶质瘤术后调强放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4727.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.002]
[8]张武哲,陈志坚,彭 逊,等.不同角度固定野动态调强在直肠癌术前放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4735.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.004]
[9]宋 威,赵 迪,鹿 红,等.射野方向优化技术在胸中上段食管癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.003]
[10]李忠伟,张九堂,吴智理,等.R620-ACF型腹部碳纤维托架对直肠癌调强放射治疗剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.012]
[11]段隆焱,蔡钢,陈毅,等. Compass在直肠癌术前调强放射治疗三维剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(12):1200.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.12.003]
　,,et al. Application of Compass system in three-dimensional dose verification of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for rectal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(9):1200.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.12.003]
[12]杨建芬,曾自力,张若蓉,等.运用PDCA循环降低直肠癌调强放疗摆位误差的效果[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(6):682.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.06.005]
　YANG Jianfen,ZENG Zili,ZHANG Ruorong,et al.Effect of PDCA circulation to reduce set-up errors in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of rectal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(9):682.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.06.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2018-03-15 【作者简介】贺睿敏，在读研究生，研究方向：医学物理，E- mail: 522986510@qq.com 【通信作者】邱小平，教授，研究方向：放射诊疗与医学剂量，E-mail: nh6651@163.com；杨振，副教授，研究方向：精准放疗与图 像处理，E-mail: yangzhen@188.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-28