[1]蔡俊涛,陈凡,王财,等. 非小细胞肺癌容积旋转调强与适形调强放疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):389-393.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.004]
 CAI Juntao,CHEN Fan,WANG Cai,et al. Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):389-393.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.004]
点击复制

 非小细胞肺癌容积旋转调强与适形调强放疗的剂量学比较()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第4期
页码:
389-393
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-04-21

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X(2018)04-0389-05
作者:
 蔡俊涛陈凡王财冯瑞兴殷麟常巧梅王晓莉刘子宁林晶
 青海大学附属医院肿瘤放疗科, 青海 西宁 810001
Author(s):
 CAI Juntao CHEN Fan WANG Cai FENG Ruixing YIN Lin CHANG Qiaomei WANG Xiaoli LIU Zining LIN Jing
 Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810001, China
关键词:
 非小细胞肺癌容积旋转调强放疗调强放疗放射治疗剂量
Keywords:
 non-small cell lung cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy intensity-modulated radiotherapy radiotherapic dose
分类号:
R811.1;R734.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的:比较容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)和适形调强放疗(IMRT)技术在非小细胞肺癌靶区和危及器官(OAR)的剂量学差异。 方法:选取首程接受放射治疗的20例非小细胞肺癌患者,分别设计5野IMRT(5F-IMRT)、7野IMRT(7F-IMRT)、双弧VMAT(D-VMAT)和部分弧VMAT(P-VMAT)计划,比较靶区剂量分布、OAR剂量体积参数。 结果:4种计划中计划靶区的Dmean比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两种VMAT计划中计划靶区的均匀性指数和适形度指数均优于两种IMRT(P<0.05);4种计划中D-VMAT肺平均剂量高于其余3种计划(P<0.05);P-VMAT的双肺V5、V10稍好于D-VMAT(P<0.05),但两种VMAT计划均高于两种IMRT计划(P<0.05);4种计划中P-VMAT的双肺V20最优,且4种计划相互间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);D-VMAT与P-VMAT双肺的V30相当(P>0.05),但均优于两种IMRT计划(P<0.05);4种计划双肺V40和心脏的V30、V40比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。P-VMAT计划的脊髓Dmax最低,与其余计划相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论:非小细胞肺癌靶区剂量分布D-VMAT和P-VMAT好于IMRT计划。P-VMAT在OAR的保护方面体现的优势更多。综合考虑,非小细胞肺癌的放疗优先推荐P-VMAT,但对于重点考虑肺低剂量区,而次要考虑靶区剂量分布的病例推荐7F-IMRT。
Abstract:
 Objective To compare the dosimetric differences in target areas and organs-at-risk (OAR) between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Four different kinds of plans, namely 5-field IMRT (5F-IMRT), 7-field IMRT (7F-IMRT), double-arc VMAT (D-VMAT) and partial-arc VMAT (P-VMAT), were designed for 20 NSCLC patients receiving radiotherapy for the first course. The dose distribution in target areas and OAR dose-volume parameters were compared. Results No significant differences were found in the Dmean of planning target areas among the 4 plans (P>0.05). The homogeneity index and conformal index of two VMAT plans were better than those of two IMRT plans (P<0.05). Compared with the other 3 plans, D-VMAT plans had the highest mean lung dose (P<0.05). The V5 and V10 of lungs in P-VMAT plan were slightly better than those in D-VMAT plan (P<0.05), and both of them were higher than those in two IMRT plans (P<0.05). The V20 of lungs in P-VMAT was the optimal among the 4 plans, and the differences between the 4 plans were statistically significant (P<0.05). D-VMAT and P-VMAT plans had similar V30 of lungs (P>0.05), superior to two IMRT plans (P<0.05). The comparison of the V30 of lungs and the V30, V40 of heart between the 4 plans didn’t showed any statistical differences (P>0.05). The Dmax of spinal cord in P-VMAT was the lowest among the 4 plans, and the differences were statistically significant as compared with other plans (P<0.05). Conclusion The target dose distributions in D-VMAT and P-VMAT plans for NSCLC are better than those in IMRT plans, moreover, P-VMAT shows more advantages in OAR sparing. Therefore, P-VMAT is recommended preferentially in radiotherapy for NSCLC, but 7F-IMRT is recommended for cases in which the low dose areas of lung is the main focus, while the target dose distribution is secondarily considered.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘旭红,陈 晓,赵 彪,等.非小细胞肺癌三维适形计划和调强计划剂量学比较与分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4740.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.005]
[2]黄宝添,吴丽丽,陈创珍,等.AXB与AAA算法在Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌立体定向治疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.008]
[3]李 毅,李文荣,苏 进,等.基于CBCT非小细胞肺癌外放边界研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):5006.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.008]
[4]陈旎,等.III期非小细胞肺癌三维适形与调强技术的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(2):198.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.02.019]
[5]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[6]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[7]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[8]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[9]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[10]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[11]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
 [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
[12]陈祥,单国平,邵凯南,等. 剂量网格分辨率大小对非小细胞肺癌立体定向放射治疗的剂量学影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(1):6.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.002]
 CHEN Xiang,SHAN Guoping,SHAO Kainan,et al. Dosimetric impacts of dose grid resolution on stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):6.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.01.002]
[13]张晋建,李志强,文婷,等.肺癌螺旋断层放疗计划设计中应用Block减少肺低剂量区的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(2):152.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.02.006]
 ZHANG Jinjian,LI Zhiqiang,WEN Ting,et al. Applying Block to reduce low-dose volume of lungs in helical tomotherapy of lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):152.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.02.006]
[14]沙雪,巩贯忠,邓红彬,等. 18F-FDG PET/CT影像组学预测非小细胞肺癌亚型的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(3):311.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.03.013]
 SHA Xue,GONG Guanzhong,DENG Hongbin,et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features for predicting the subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):311.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.03.013]
[15]罗居东,马长升,赵睿,等. PET特征改变对非小细胞肺癌放射治疗的预测价值[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(6):677.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.011]
 LUO Judong,MA Changsheng,ZHAO Rui,et al. Predictive value of PET feature change in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):677.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2017-10-22
【基金项目】青海省科技支撑计划项目(2015-SF-131)
【作者简介】蔡俊涛,在读硕士研究生,主要从事临床肿瘤放射物理研究,E-mail: 397484932@qq.com
【通信作者】陈凡,教授,主任医师,硕士生导师,主要从事胸部肿瘤临床放射治疗工作,E-mail: chfa1964@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-23