[1]黄霖,刘懿梅,陈美宁,等.直肠癌调强放疗的临床计划质量优化和评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2024,41(2):133-138.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.02.001]
　HUANG Lin,LIU Yimei,CHEN Meining,et al.Quality re-optimization and assessment of radiotherapy plan for rectal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2024,41(2):133-138.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.02.001]
点击复制

直肠癌调强放疗的临床计划质量优化和评估()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
41卷
期数:
2024年第2期
页码:
133-138
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2024-03-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quality re-optimization and assessment of radiotherapy plan for rectal cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2024）02-0133-06
作者:
黄霖1; 2; 刘懿梅3; 陈美宁3; 黄劭敏3; 邓小武3; 彭应林3; 张煜1
1.南方医科大学生物医学工程学院， 广东 广州 510515； 2.潮州市中心医院肿瘤科， 广东 潮州 521000； 3.中山大学肿瘤防治中心/华南肿瘤学国家实验室/肿瘤医学协同创新中心放疗科， 广东 广州 510060
Author(s):
HUANG Lin1; 2;  LIU Yimei3;  CHEN Meining3;  HUANG Shaomin3;  DENG Xiaowu3;  PENG Yinglin3;  ZHANG Yu1
1. School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China 2. Department of Oncology, Chaozhou Central Hospital, Chaozhou 521000, China 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center/State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China/Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
关键词:
直肠癌; 调强放疗计划; 放疗计划质量控制; PlanIQ; 计划筛选
Keywords:
Keywords: rectal cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy radiotherapy plan quality control PlanIQ plan screening
分类号:
R318；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.02.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】目的：采用PlanIQ软件评估直肠癌调强放射治疗临床治疗计划和再优化计划的质量，为调强放疗计划筛选和优化提供方法和工具。方法：回顾性随机选取20例接受调强放疗的直肠癌患者，调强放疗技术（IMRT）和旋转容积调强技术（VMAT）计划各10例。（1）临床治疗计划设计（TP）：IMRT计划采用5野等间距照射，VMAT计划采用2个360°弧旋转照射。处方剂量为PTV1：50 Gy/25 f；PTV2：45 Gy/25 f。所有计划均采用直接机器参数优化，且要求95%等剂量线能覆盖100%靶区体积，危及器官（OARs）参考耐受剂量标准来限制。计划完成后由医生审核确认，并经过计划剂量验证后实施治疗。（2）治疗计划再优化设计（RP）：由1名有10年经验的计划设计者对20例TP计划进行重新优化，保持照射技术和照射野条件不变，根据个人经验重新调整计划优化条件和参数，直到OARs剂量尽可能低，且不影响PTV的目标覆盖率。用PlanIQ软件分别对TP和RP计划质量进行量化评估。两组计划之间剂量DVH参数和计划质量指数（PQI）行非参数的Wilcoxon符号秩检验。结果：RP计划的各DVH参数均优于TP计划，其中PTV1的Dmax、小肠的V45 Gy和Dmax以及结肠的V45 Gy的差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。IMRT组、VMAT组和所有患者的RP计划的质量评分均高于TP计划，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05），其PQI分别为（88.55±3.35 vs 86.61±4.63, P=0.005）、（89.72±3.15 vs 87.21±3.04, P=0.028）和（89.14±3.22 vs 86.91±3.22, P=0.001）。结论：计划再优化可以进一步提高直肠癌调强放疗的临床计划质量，PlanIQ软件为放疗计划质量控制和优质计划筛选提供了一种有效工具。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the quality of treatment planning (TP) and re-optimization planning (RP) of radiotherapy for rectal cancer using PlanIQ software, thereby providing methods and tools for the screening and optimization of radiotherapy plans. Methods Twenty patients with rectal cancer who received radiotherapy were selected retrospectively, with 10 cases of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 10 of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). (1) TP: IMRT plan involved 5-field irradiation, and VMAT plan involved two 360° arcs. The prescription doses were 50 Gy/25 f for PTV1 and 45 Gy/25 f for PTV2. All plans underwent direct machine parameter optimization and required 95% isodose lines to cover 100% of the target volume. Organs-at-risk (OAR) were limited by reference to tolerated dose standards. After the planning was completed, the plans were reviewed and confirmed by a physician, and the treatment was implemented after dose verification. (2) RP: a physicist with 10 years of experience re-optimized the 20 TP plans, with the irradiation technique and field setting unchanged. The re-optimization involved adjusting planning conditions and parameters based on individual experience until the dose to OAR was minimized while without affecting PTV coverage. The quality of TP plans and RP plans were quantitatively evaluated using PlanIQ software. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for dose-volume histogram parameters and plan quality index between two groups. Results The dose-volume histogram parameters in RP plans were superior to those in TP plans, and the differences in the Dmax of PTV1, the V45 Gy and Dmax of small intestine, and the V45 Gy of colon were statistically significant (P<0.05). The quality scores of RP plans for IMRT group, VMAT group and all patients were significantly higher than those of TP plans (P<0.05), with plan quality index of 88.55±3.35 vs 86.61±4.63 (P=0.005), 89.72±3.15 vs 87.21±3.04 (P=0.028), and 89.14±3.22 vs 86.91±3.22 (P=0.001), respectively. Conclusion RP can further improve the quality of radiotherapy plan for rectal cancer. PlanIQ software serves as an effective tool for quality control and screening of radiotherapy planning.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 磊,王晓梅,陈维平,等.调强放疗计划中两种不同剂量算法的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):401.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.022]
[2]张武哲,陈志坚,彭 逊,等.不同角度固定野动态调强在直肠癌术前放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4735.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.004]
[3]李忠伟,张九堂,吴智理,等.R620-ACF型腹部碳纤维托架对直肠癌调强放射治疗剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.012]
[4]吴虹,翟福山,刘明,等.应用CBCT研究膀胱体积大小对直肠癌术后放疗剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4253.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.010]
[5]张艺宝,吴昊,李莎,等.临床前验证与几何对比分析基于图谱库的危及器官自动勾画[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(2):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
[6]王沛沛,刘哲铭,李彩虹,等.容积旋转调强与固定野动态调强在直肠癌新辅助放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):901.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.030]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(2):901.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.030]
[7]姚文良,许波,戚金凤,等.直肠癌术前不同照射技术剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(3):317.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.03.021]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(2):317.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.03.021]
[8]黎旦,宾石珍,程品晶,等.非晶硅电子射野影像系统与Arc CHECK在直肠癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(7):674.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.006]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(2):674.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.006]
[9]王贝,全红,邱杰,等. 容积旋转调强技术用于直肠癌时最佳机架角度设置研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):898.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.006]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(2):898.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.006]
[10]孙永健,曹洋森,代智涛,等.Monaco设计直肠癌固定机架角调强和容积旋转调强治疗的剂量[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(2):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.02.010]
　Dosimetric comparison of seven- field intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer designed with Monaco[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(2):161.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.02.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-08-01 【基金项目】国家重点研发计划（2022YFC2402304）；国家自然科学基金（12005316）；中华国际医学交流基金会肿瘤精准放疗星火计划（2019-N-11-20）；广州市科技计划（202206010154，202206010180）? 【作者简介】黄霖，硕士研究生，研究方向：放射治疗计划设计与剂量学，E-mail: 705854163@qq.com 【通信作者】张煜，教授，研究方向：医学图像分析与肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: yuzhang@smu.edu.cn；彭应林，博士，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理学，E-mail: pengyl@sysucc.org.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-27