[1]王润堃,陆汉强,黄秋生.口腔癌调强放疗中靶区优化对患者口腔黏膜反应、唾液腺功能的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2024,41(2):145-150.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.02.003]
 WANG Runkun,LU Hanqiang,HUANG Qiusheng.Effects of optimizing target volume on oral mucosal reaction and salivary gland function in oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2024,41(2):145-150.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.02.003]
点击复制

口腔癌调强放疗中靶区优化对患者口腔黏膜反应、唾液腺功能的影响()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
41卷
期数:
2024年第2期
页码:
145-150
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2024-03-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of optimizing target volume on oral mucosal reaction and salivary gland function in oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy
文章编号:
1005-202X(2024)02-0145-06
作者:
王润堃陆汉强黄秋生
江苏大学附属医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科, 江苏 镇江 212000
Author(s):
WANG Runkun LU Hanqiang HUANG Qiusheng
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China
关键词:
口腔癌调强放疗靶区优化口腔黏膜反应唾液腺功能
Keywords:
Keywords: oropharyngeal cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy target volume optimization oral mucosal reaction salivary gland function
分类号:
R739.8;R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.02.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】目的:分析口腔癌调强放疗中靶区优化对患者口腔黏膜反应、唾液腺功能的影响。方法:选择2020年4月至2022年8月江苏大学附属医院收治的120例口腔癌患者,按随机数表法分组。对照组60例,接受常规调强放疗。试验组60例,在调强放疗中对颈部Ⅱ区与口腔靶区进行优化。对比两组调强放疗后3个月疗效、腮腺受量、急性口腔黏膜反应发生率、口干反应发生率与口腔疼痛发生率,并观察放疗前、放疗第4周、放疗结束、放疗后3个月患者腮腺、颌下腺静息状态下表观弥散系数(ADC)值变化。结果:试验组客观缓解率与对照组相比[80.00%(48/60) vs 75.00%(45/60)],差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组健侧腮腺限制平均照射剂量(Dmean)、V34及口腔Dmean、V30均比对照组低(P<0.05);试验组放疗后3个月急性口腔黏膜反应、口干反应与口腔疼痛发生率(41.67%、50.00%、58.33%)均比对照组(75.00%、78.33%、85.00%)低(P<0.05);两组放疗第4周、放疗结束、放疗后3个月腮腺、颌下腺静息状态下ADC值均比放疗前升高(P<0.05);试验组放疗第4周、放疗结束、放疗后3个月腮腺、颌下腺静息状态下ADC值均比对照组低(P<0.05)。结论:口腔癌调强放疗中靶区优化可有效预防相关口腔黏膜炎的发生,降低口腔黏膜反应、口腔疼痛及口干程度,减少腮腺受量,减轻调强放疗对患者唾液腺功能的影响。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To analyze the effects of target volume optimization on oral mucosal reaction and salivary gland function in oropharyngeal cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods A total of 120 patients with oropharyngeal cancer admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from April 2020 to August 2022 were selected and randomly grouped into control group (n=60, conventional IMRT) and treatment group (n=60, cervical region II and the oral target region were optimized during IMRT). The therapeutic efficacy, parotid gland dose, incidence of acute oral mucosal reaction, dry mouth and oral pain at 3 months after IMRT were compared between two groups. The resting-state apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of parotid and submandibular glands at different time points (before radiotherapy, the 4th week of radiotherapy, the end of radiotherapy and 3 months after radiotherapy) were recorded. Results The difference in the objective reaction rate between two groups was trivial [80.00% (48/60) vs 75.00% (45/60), P>0.05]. The mean dose (Dmean) and V34 of the unaffected parotid gland and the Dmean and V30 of the oral cavity in treatment group were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). The incidences of acute oral mucosal reaction, dry mouth and oral pain at 3 months after radiotherapy in treatment group were 41.67%, 50.00%, and 58.33%, lower than those in control group (75.00%, 78.33%, and 85.00%) (P<0.05). The resting-state ADC values of parotid and submandibular glands at the 4th week of radiotherapy, the end of radiotherapy, and 3 months after radiotherapy in both two groups were higher than those before radiotherapy (P<0.05). At the 4th week of radiotherapy, the end of radiotherapy, and 3 months after radiotherapy, the resting-state ADC values of parotid and submandibular glands in treatment group were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Optimizing target volume during oropharyngeal IMRT can effectively prevent the occurrence of radiation-induced mucositis, alleviate oral mucosal reaction, oral pain and dry mouth, reduce parotid gland dose, and diminish the effects of IMRT on salivary gland function in patients.

相似文献/References:

[1]张富利,王雅棣,许卫东,等.应用两种三维探测器阵列进行螺旋断层调强放疗计划剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):218.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.015]
[2]王捷,裴曦,曹瑞芬,等.一种快速调强放射治疗直接子野优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.002]
[3]曾 彪,张九堂,席许平.单中心上下半野调强放射治疗的物理剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):17.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.005]
[4]李珠明,崔玉琴,白晓平,等.多通道剂量测量仪在调强放疗剂量检测中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4600.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.002]
[5]李丹明,孙新臣,张 胜,等.食道癌患者心脏图谱指导下心脏勾画的一致性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4857.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.003]
[6]陈广涛,汪 淇,刘亚强,等.TrueBeam加速器射野准直器跟随功能在鼻咽癌固定野调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4865.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.005]
[7]雷怀宇,张书旭.乏氧显像及其在放射治疗中的应用研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4975.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.001]
[8]苏清秀,张 矛,金海国,等.比较调强放射治疗与三维适形放疗治疗中下段食管癌时心脏和冠状动脉的受量[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5139.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.010]
[9]刘建庭,王晋丽,郭瑞嵩,等.简化调强技术在脑转移瘤外照射中应用的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.005]
[10]周瑛瑛,邱小平,狄晓云,等."Pretend"Bolus在乳腺癌根治术后调强放疗应用中的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3848.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-07-11 【基金项目】江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(Z2020056) 【作者简介】王润堃,硕士研究生,研究方向:头颈部鳞状细胞癌,E-mail: wangrunkun6868@163.com 【通信作者】黄秋生,主任医师,硕士,研究方向:头颈部鳞状细胞癌,E-mail: shengqiuhuang@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-27