[1]张容,赖晶.医院放射防护能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(3):392-396.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.023]
　ZHANG Rong,LAI Jing.Hospital occupational radiological protection ability scale: compilation, validity and reliability[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(3):392-396.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.023]
点击复制

医院放射防护能力量表的编制及信效度检验()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第3期
页码:
392-396
栏目:
其他（激光医学等）
出版日期:
2021-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Hospital occupational radiological protection ability scale: compilation, validity and reliability
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）03-0392-05
作者:
张容1; 2; 赖晶2
1.广东省人民医院/广东省医学科学院， 广东 广州 510080； 2.南方医科大学护理学院， 广东 广州 510515
Author(s):
ZHANG Rong1;  2;  LAI Jing2
1. Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China 2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
关键词:
放射防护; 量表编制; 信度; 效度
Keywords:
Keywords: radiological protection scale compilation reliability validity
分类号:
R148；R312
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：编制医院放射防护能力量表并进行信效度检验，为医院管理者及医务人员评估医院职业放射防护能力水平提供有效测评工具。方法：量表根据最新的国家标准和查阅相关学术文献，由专家小组反复研究讨论而成。量表的信效度是经对307名放射人员进行发放问卷调查后行统计分析、测定而成。结果：医院放射防护能力量表共包括放射防护相关规章制度、医护人员放射防护健康监测、设备维护与防护距离、辐射剂量检测设备、个人防护材料与手术操作要求，共6个维度，24个条目。I-CVI=0.90，S-CVI/Ave=0.90，内容效度良好；Cronbachs α系数=0.818，信度良好；通过探索性因子分析显示6个公因子累积贡献率=55.70%，验证性因子分析结果显示，[χ2]=276.318，df=237，[χ2]/df=1.166，RMSEA=0.033，CFI=0.913，结构效度良好。结论：医院放射防护能力量表具有良好的信效度，可作为卫生行政管理部门及医院管理者评价职业辐射防护能力的可靠、有效的工具并进行辐射防护综合评估。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compile and validate a scale (HORPAS) for hospital managers and medical personnel to evaluate hospital occupational radiological protection ability. Methods HORPAS was compiled by an appointed expert panel based upon the latest released national standards and relevant academic literatures. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 307 radiologists for evaluating the reliability and validity of the scale. Results HORPAS was composed of 6 dimensions, with a total of 24 items. The dimensions included radiation protection regulations, radiation protection health monitoring for medical personnel, equipment maintenance and protection distance, radiation dose detection equipment, personal protective materials and surgical operation requirements. The results showed that I-CVI=0.90, S-CVI/Ave=0.90, indicating a good content validity, and that Cronbachs α=0.818, indicating a good reliability. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the factors could explain 55.70% of the total variance, and confirmatory factor analysis showed that [χ2]=276.318, df=237, [χ2]/df=1.166, RMSEA=0.033, CFI=0.913, indicating a good construct validity. Conclusion HORPAS which had a good validity and reliability can be used as a reliable and valid instrument for healthcare administration department and hospital managers to evaluate hospital occupational radiological protection ability.

相似文献/References:

[1]李忠伟,鲁旭尉,倪千喜,等.多个加速器机房设计方案和布局方式的初步探讨[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(03):4111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.03.006]
[2]王美娇,张艺宝,李莎,等. 瓦里安千伏级锥形束CT系统间剂量学一致性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):546.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(3):546.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.002]
[3]李正贤,赵晶晶,马永乐,等. 医科达XVI锥形束CT头颈部扫描角度优化[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1106.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.006]
　LI Zhengxian,ZHAO Jingjing,MA Yongle,et al. Optimizing gantry rotation of head and neck scanning for Elekta XVI cone beam CT[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(3):1106.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-10-18 【基金项目】广东省医学科研基金（C2014001） 【作者简介】张容，硕士，主任护师，硕士生导师，E-mail: 1344192002@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-30