[1]刘苹,吴茜,杨磊,等.超声引导下双侧多点竖脊肌平面阻滞在后路脊柱侧凸矫正融合术中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(11):1394-1397.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.11.010]
　LIU Ping,WU Qian,YANG Lei,et al.Application of erector spinae plane block to the posterior scoliosis correction and fusion with the guidance of ultrasonic[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(11):1394-1397.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.11.010]
点击复制

超声引导下双侧多点竖脊肌平面阻滞在后路脊柱侧凸矫正融合术中的应用()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第11期
页码:
1394-1397
栏目:
医学影像物理
出版日期:
2020-12-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of erector spinae plane block to the posterior scoliosis correction and fusion with the guidance of ultrasonic
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）11-1394-04
作者:
刘苹; 吴茜; 杨磊; 姚尚龙
华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院麻醉科， 湖北 武汉 430022
Author(s):
LIU Ping;  WU Qian;  YANG Lei;  YAO Shanglong
Department of Anesthesiology, Xiehe Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
关键词:
超声引导; 竖脊肌平面阻滞; 后路脊柱侧凸矫正融合术; 术后镇痛
Keywords:
Keywords: guidance of ultrasonic erector spinae plane block posterior scoliosis corection postoperative analgesia
分类号:
R614.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.11.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：探讨超声引导下双侧多点竖脊肌平面阻滞（ESPB）在后路脊柱侧凸矫正全麻手术中的应用和对术后镇痛的影响。方法：选取择期后路脊柱侧凸矫正融合术患者40例，ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ，按照随机数字表法将所有患者分为ESPB组（E组）和对照组（C组），每组20例。E组于全身麻醉诱导前30 min分别行双侧T5和T10水平的ESPB，C组注射等量生理盐水。注药20 min后使用针刺痛觉评估法监测感觉阻滞平面。两组患者均采用相同的麻醉诱导及麻醉维持方案，术中均采用Narcotrend监测麻醉镇静深度。术后均行舒芬太尼自控静脉镇痛。记录两组患者术中麻醉药物用量、术后苏醒时间、术后2、4、6、12、24 h静息视觉模拟评分（VAS评分）和24 h PCA镇痛泵舒芬太尼用量及PCA按压次数；相关不良反应（恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制）以及阻滞相关并发症（穿刺部位感染、血肿、局麻药中毒）。结果：E组患者术中麻醉药物用量、苏醒时间、术后2、4、6、12 h VAS评分和PCA舒芬太尼用量及PCA按压次数均低于C组（P<0.05）。但术后24 h VAS评分两组比较差异无统计学意义。E组未出现穿刺部位感染、血肿、局麻药中毒等并发症。结论：超声引导下双侧多点ESPB在后路脊柱侧凸矫正融合术中能提供良好的镇痛，可以缩短麻醉苏醒时间，降低围术期阿片类药物的使用。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective Under the guidance of ultrasonic, to explore the application of erector spinae plane block to the general anesthesia surgery of posterior scoliosis correction and fusion and its effects on postoperative analgesia. Methods A total of 40 patients with posterior scoliosis correction and fusion were sampled, and these patients are all in level I-II of the ASA class. According to random number table, all patients were divided into ESPB group (group E) and control group (group C), with 20 patients in each group. In E group, ESPB was conducted at the level of T5 and T10 when 30 minutes before the anesthesia induction, while in group C, the same amount of normal saline was injected. 20 minutes after the injection, the method of evaluating pain with acupuncture was used to monitor the sensory blockade. Both groups underwent the same induction and maintenance of anesthesia, narcotrend was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia and sedation during the operation, and sufentanil was adopted for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after the operation. The dosage of anesthetic, time to awaken, visual analogue scales at rest (2, 4, 6, 12, and 14 h after operation respectively), the 24 h PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) dosage of sufentanil, and the times of PCA compression were recorded. The adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression) and the complications (infection of puncture site, hematoma, local anesthetic poisoning) were also recorded. Results The dosage of anesthetic, time to awaken, VAS score, the dosage of sufentanil and the times of PCA compression in E group are all less than those in group C (P<0.05). However, the differences in VAS score at 24 h after the operation between the two groups have no statistical significance. In E group, there were no complications such as infection of puncture site, hematoma and local anesthetic poisoning. Conclusion Under the guidance of ultrasound, ESPB can provide efficient analgesia for the posterior scoliosis correction and fusion, shorten time to awaken and reduce the usage of opioids during the perioperative period.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵丹阳,刘新华,杨建梅,等.超声引导下穿刺注射无水乙醇联合米非司酮治疗绝经期子宫内膜异位症的疗效评价[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):298.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.035]
[2]何锋坚,李立夫,刘素英,等.经皮微波消融治疗肝硬化脾功能亢进症的临床研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(5):510.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.016]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):510.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.05.016]
[3]李柱,乔安意,王翀,等. 超声引导下射频消融术治疗肝癌疗效及预后影响因素分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(10):1058.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.018]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(11):1058.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.018]
[4]杜小梅,李明锐,吴让兵,等. 超声引导下微波消融治疗难治性甲亢临床疗效[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(6):697.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.015]
　DU Xiaomei,LI Mingrui,WU Rangbing,et al. Therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for refractory hyperthyroidism[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(11):697.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.015]
[5]黄巧文,林志坚,陆志伟,等.“S-Nerve型”超声引导下行腹横肌平面阻滞的临床研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(5):599.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.05.013]
　HUANG Qiaowen,LIN Zhijian,LU Zhiwei,et al.Clinical study on transversus abdominis plane block by "S-Nerve" ultrasound guidance[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(11):599.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.05.013]
[6]高应鸿,张面焕.超声引导下肿胀麻醉液辅助腔内激光治疗下肢静脉曲张[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(8):1045.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.020]
　GAO Yinghong,ZHANG Mianhuan.Ultrasound-guided endovascular laser therapy assisted by tumescent anesthetic solution in treating varicose veins in lower extremities[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(11):1045.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.020]
[7]裴有铭,刘卫锋.超声引导C7星状神经节阻滞对全麻围拔管期血流动力学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(2):204.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.014]
　PEI Youming,LIU Weifeng.Effects of ultrasound-guided C7 stellate ganglion block on hemodynamics during periextubation of general anesthesia[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(11):204.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.014]
[8]林盛敏,陈小云.超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合丙泊酚麻醉在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(5):567.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.05.008]
　LIN Shengmin,CHEN Xiaoyun.Application of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block combined with propofol anesthesia in laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(11):567.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.05.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-05-02 【基金项目】贝朗麻醉科学研究基金（BBDF-2018-005） 【作者简介】刘苹，硕士，主治医师，研究方向：临床麻醉学、术后镇痛，E-mail: bboofeng@163.com 【通信作者】姚尚龙，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：麻醉与危重医学，E-mail: ysltian@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-02