[1]罗红樱,周剑良,单国平,等.左侧乳腺癌术后放疗无均整器模式剂量学优势分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(3):281-286.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.003]
　LUO Hongying,ZHOU Jianliang,et al.Dosimetric advantages of postoperative radiotherapy in flattening filter-free mode for left-sided breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(3):281-286.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.003]
点击复制

左侧乳腺癌术后放疗无均整器模式剂量学优势分析()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第3期
页码:
281-286
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dosimetric advantages of postoperative radiotherapy in flattening filter-free mode for left-sided breast cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）03-0281-06
作者:
罗红樱1; 2; 周剑良1; 单国平2; 邵凯南2; 杨一威2; 周霞3
1.南华大学核科学技术学院， 湖南 衡阳 421001； 2.中国科学院大学附属肿瘤医院（浙江省肿瘤医院）放射物理室， 浙江 杭州310022； 3.中国科学院大学附属肿瘤医院（浙江省肿瘤医院）放疗科， 浙江 杭州 310022
Author(s):
LUO Hongying1;  2;  ZHOU Jianliang1;  SHAN Guoping2;  SHAO Kainan2;  YANG Yiwei2;  ZHOU Xia3
1. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China 2. Department of Radiation Physics, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, China 3. Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, China
关键词:
乳腺癌; 无均整器模式; 容积旋转调强放疗; 剂量学
Keywords:
Keywords: breast cancer flatten filter-free mode volumetric modulated arc therapy dosimetric
分类号:
R318；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较左侧乳腺癌全切术后无均整器（FFF）与均整器（FF）模式下容积旋转调强放疗（VMAT）计划剂量学特点，分析无均整器模式下剂量学优势。方法：随机选取2019~2020年左侧乳腺癌全切术后的患者10例，分别用两种模式对同一患者的计划靶区（PTV）给予相同的处方剂量50 Gy，在RayStation计划系统上设计FFF和FF的VMAT计划，在满足临床要求的情况下，比较两组剂量学特点、机器总跳数、出束总时间。结果：FFF模式靶区PTV的D98%低于FF模式（P=0.007），D95%、D2%、CI、HI两者比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；FFF模式在患侧肺、全肺、心脏、脊髓以及冠状动脉前降支保护上明显优于FF模式（P<0.05），患侧肺平均剂量同比降低9.59%，心脏平均剂量降低12.20%；在健侧肺、臂丛以及正常组织的保护上两者比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；FFF模式的机器总跳数相对于FF模式增加1.30倍，出束总时间缩短至FF模式的87.15%。结论：在两组治疗计划均能满足临床治疗要求的前提下，FFF模式可显著减少患者危及器官以及正常组织的受照剂量，虽然机器总跳数增加，但患者的治疗时间反而下降。因此可知FFF模式优于FF模式的治疗效率。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric characteristics of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan in flattening filter (FF) mode and flattening filter?ree (FFF) mode, and to analyze the dosimetric advantages of FFF-VMAT. Methods Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer after total resection from 2019 to 2020 were randomly selected. The same prescription dose of 50 Gy was given to the planning target volume (PTV) of the same patient by two modes separately, and two kinds of plans, namely FFF-VMAT plan and FF-VMAT plan, were designed on RayStation planning system. When the clinical requirements were met, the dosimetric characteristics, total monitor units and total delivery time were compared between FFF-VMAT and FF-VMAT. Results Except for the D98% of PTV which was lower in FFF-VMAT than that in FF-VMAT (P=0.007), there was no significant difference between two groups in the D95%, D2%, CI and HI of PTV (P>0.05). FFF mode was superior to FF mode in protection of affected lung, the whole lungs, heart, spinal cord and anterior coronary artery (P<0.05), and compared with those in FF-VMAT, the average dose delivered to the affected lung and heart in FFF-VMAT were decreased by 9.59% and 12.20%, respectively. The differences between FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT in sparing of the healthy lung, brachial plexus and normal tissues were trivial, without statistical significance (P>0.05). The total monitor units of FFF-VMAT was 1.30 times of that of FF-VMAT, and the total delivery time was shortened to 87.15% of FF-VMAT. Conclusion On the premise that the treatment plans of both groups can meet the clinical treatment requirements, FFF mode can significantly reduce the radiation dose delivered to organs-at-risk and normal tissues. Although the total monitor units in FFF-VMAT is increased, the treatment time is shortened. Therefore, the treatment efficiency of FFF mode is better than that of FF mode.

相似文献/References:

[1]柏 晗,王 丽,刘旭红,等.左乳腺5种不同主野分布IMRT计划的剂量比较分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):210.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.013]
[2]张晋建,黎 静,文 婷,等.Arc CHECK在乳腺癌螺旋断层放疗计划剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.021]
[3]白 雪,杜向慧,王升晔,等.半野技术结合非共面照射技术在乳腺癌胸锁联合照射中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4849.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.001]
[4]赵永亮,储开岳,吴建亭,等.两种不同调强技术配合主动呼吸控制系统在乳腺癌放疗中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4862.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.004]
[5]花威,张西志,张先稳,等.RapidArc在乳腺癌术后放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3984.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.005]
[6]徐金济,成俊,李伟,等.左侧乳腺癌改良根治术后逆向调强放射治疗的摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4358.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.004]
[7]孟慧鹏,孙小喆,孙劲松,等.右乳腺癌术后放疗中VMAT和dIMRT的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4387.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.011]
[8]刘旭红,陈晓,艾毅钦,等.早期左乳腺癌保乳术后仰卧位和俯卧位照射剂量学比较与分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(05):737.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.028]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(3):737.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.028]
[9]张艺宝,吴昊,李莎,等.临床前验证与几何对比分析基于图谱库的危及器官自动勾画[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(3):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
[10]段云龙,杨涛,曲宝林,等.乳腺癌保乳切线野三维适形、切线野正向调强及逆向调强放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):841.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.017]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(3):841.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-11-12 【基金项目】浙江省重点科技研发计划（2019C03003）；浙江省医药卫生科技计划（2020KY472） 【作者简介】罗红樱，硕士研究生，研究方向：放射物理治疗，E-mail: 1374109214@qq.com 【通信作者】周剑良，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：辐射防护，E-mail: 13327341099@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-30