[1]张俊,彭应林,朱金汉,等.射野角度优化方法在全段食管癌IMRT计划设计中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(4):413-418.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.04.004]
　ZHANG Jun,PENG Yinglin,ZHU Jinhan,et al.Application of beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for esophageal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(4):413-418.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.04.004]
点击复制

射野角度优化方法在全段食管癌IMRT计划设计中的应用()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第4期
页码:
413-418
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-04-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for esophageal cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）04-0413-06
作者:
张俊1; 2; 彭应林2; 朱金汉2; 刘懿梅2; 陈美宁2; 邓小武2; 周凌宏1
1.南方医科大学生物医学工程学院， 广东 广州 510515； 2.中山大学肿瘤防治中心放疗科，华南肿瘤学国家实验室，肿瘤医学协同创新中心， 广东 广州 510060
Author(s):
ZHANG Jun1; 2;  PENG Yinglin2;  ZHU Jinhan2;  LIU Yimei2;  CHEN Meining2;  DENG Xiaowu2;  ZHOU Linghong1
1. School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
关键词:
射野角度优化; 调强放射治疗; 全段食管癌; 综合评分因子
Keywords:
Keywords: beam angle optimization;  intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  esophageal cancer;  comprehensive scoring factor
分类号:
R815.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：分析射野角度优化（BAO）布野、均分布野和人工布野3种5野全段食管癌IMRT计划设计方法的剂量学差异，为全段食管癌IMRT计划设计提供临床参考。方法：选取15例行IMRT治疗的全段食管癌患者，分别设计3种5野IMRT（5f-IMRT）计划：基于BAO方法布野计划组（A组）、均分布野计划组（B组）以及人工布野计划组（C组）。用靶区覆盖率、适形度指数（CI）和均匀性指数（HI）以及各危及器官的剂量学参数来比较3组计划方法的剂量学差异，统计分析用配对t检验方法。结果：3组计划的靶区剂量覆盖均能满足临床要求。对于危及器官，A组计划的双肺Dmean和心脏平均值明显低于其他两组计划，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。相对于C组计划，A组和B组计划中双肺的V20 Gy和心脏V30 Gy均明显降低（P<0.05），其中A vs C、B vs C的双肺V20 Gy和心脏V30 Gy分别为［（29.15±2.75）% vs （30.03±2.55）%, P=0.005］、［（29.08±2.40）% vs （30.03±2.55）%, P=0.005］和［（45.37±4.59）% vs （48.24±6.45）%, P=0.010］、［（45.79±4.60）% vs （48.24±6.45）%, P=0.040］。最后，对3组计划的剂量学参数进行综合评分，其中A组计划中的靶区PTVx综合评分、危及器官综合评分和计划综合评分得分均为最高，其中计划综合评分CSFTotal为7。C组计划综合评分最差，CSFTotal为-4。结论：相比于人工布野方法与均分布野方法设计的全段食管癌5f-IMRT计划，BAO计划具有明显的剂量学优势，建议在全段食管癌的计划设计中推广应用。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study the dosimetric differences among 5-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (5f-IMRT) plans designed by beam angle optimization (BAO), uniform field distribution or artificial field distribution for providing clinical reference for the IMRT planning for esophageal cancer. Methods Fifteen patients with esophageal cancer treated with IMRT were selected, and 3 kinds of 5f-IMRT plans were designed for each patient, namely BAO group (group A), uniform field distribution group (group B) and artificial field distribution group (group C). The target coverage, conformity index, homogeneity index of target areas and the dosimetric parameters of organs-at-risk were used to compare the dosimetric differences among 3 groups. Paired-t test was used for statistical analysis. Results The target coverage of all 3 groups met the clinical requirements. The mean doses of the lung and the heart in group A were significantly lower than those in the other two groups, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Compared with those in group C, the lung V20 Gy and heart V30 Gy in group A and group B were significantly lower (P<0.05). The lung V20 Gy of A vs C and B vs C were ［(29.15±2.75)% vs (30.03±2.55)%, P=0.005］ and ［(29.08±2.40)% vs (30.03±2.55)%, P=0.005)］, respectively, and the heart V30 Gy were ［(45.37±4.59)% vs (48.24±6.45)%, P=0.010)］ and ［(45.79±4.60)% vs (48.24±6.45)%, P=0.040)］, respectively. Finally, the dosimetric parameters of 3 groups were evaluated to obtain comprehensive scoring factor-based scores (CSF). The CSFPTVx, CSFOAR and CSFTotal in group A were the highest, and CSFTotal reached 7; and group C had the worst CSFTotal which was -4. Conclusion BAO plan for esophageal cancer has obvious dosimetric advantages over the 5f-IMRT plans designed by uniform field distribution and artificial field distribution, which suggests that BAO plan should be popularized and applied in the treatment planning for esophageal cancer.

相似文献/References:

[1]史贵连,叶福丽.PTW729二维矩阵的平面剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.020]
[2]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[3]巩汉顺,王金媛,丛小虎,等.晚期胰腺癌适形、简化调强及螺旋断层放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.003]
[4]曾 彪,张九堂,席许平,等.单中心上下半野技术在胸中上段食管癌放射治疗中的剂量学分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):357.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.012]
[5]史贵连,叶福丽.肺癌调强放疗计划的设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.013]
[6]陈炳周,路俊哲,侯 氢.不同设计方式的调强逆向治疗计划比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):391.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.020]
[7]周 钢,田 野,陆雪官,等.同步加量技术应用于脑胶质瘤术后调强放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4727.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.002]
[8]储开岳,蔡晶,吴建亭,等.胰腺癌3DCRT计划设计中BAO和BAF两种优化的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4730.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.003]
[9]宋 威,赵 迪,鹿 红,等.射野方向优化技术在胸中上段食管癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.003]
[10]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[11]宋威,赵迪,鹿红,等.胃癌术后调强放疗射野角度优化的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):815.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.012]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(4):815.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-01-12 【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（81874216）；国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0113203）；广东省科技计划项目（2015B020214002）；广东省食管癌研究所科技计划项目（Q201908） 【作者简介】张俊，硕士，主管技师，研究方向：放射治疗计划设计与剂量学，E-mail: zhangjun@sysucc.org.cn 【通信作者】周凌宏，博士，教授，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理与医学放射成像，E-mail: smart@smu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-29