[1]张嘉蓉,杨鑫,王彬,等.不同配准算法对晚期食管癌自适应放疗累积剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(9):1088-1094.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.09.002]
　ZHANG Jiarong,YANG Xin,et al.Effects of different registration algorithms on cumulative dose of adaptive radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(9):1088-1094.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.09.002]
点击复制

不同配准算法对晚期食管癌自适应放疗累积剂量的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第9期
页码:
1088-1094
栏目:
医学人工智能
出版日期:
2020-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different registration algorithms on cumulative dose of adaptive radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）09-1088-07
作者:
张嘉蓉1; 2; 杨鑫1; 王彬1; 郑万佳1; 3; 黄思娟1
1. 中山大学肿瘤防治中心/华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室/肿瘤医学协同创新中心/广东省鼻咽癌诊治研究重点实验室，广东广州 510060；2. 中山大学新华学院，广东广州510000；3. 中国人民解放军南部战区空军医院，广东广州510507
Author(s):
ZHANG Jiarong1;  2;  YANG Xin1;  WANG Bin1;  ZHENG Wanjia1;  3;  HUANG Sijuan1
1. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center/State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China/Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou 510060, China 2. Xinhua College of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China 3. Air Force Hospital of Southern Theater of the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army, Guangzhou 510507, China
关键词:
晚期食管癌; 图像配准; 自适应放疗; 累积剂量
Keywords:
advanced esophageal cancer image registration adaptive radiation therapy cumulative dose
分类号:
R735.1；R811.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.09.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：研究不同配准方法对晚期食管癌自适应放疗累积剂量的影响并为临床应用提供指导。方法：选取11例不可 手术的晚期食管癌患者，将两程放疗计划均导入Velocity 软件，并以第二程计划CT图像（CTB）作为primary image，第一 程计划CT 图像（CTA）作为secondary image，用4 种配准方法，即Rigid（Rd）、Deformable Multi Pass（DMP）、Rigid+ Deformable Multi Pass（Rd+DMP）、Rigid+Extended Deformable Multi Pass（Rd+EDMP）进行图像配准及剂量叠加。采用 危及器官（OAR）相似性指数（DSC）来评价不同配准方式的精确度，并采用配对t检验和秩和检验分析不同配准方式下靶 区和OAR累积剂量的差异。结果：DMP和Rd+DMP配准下肝、脊髓和脊髓外扩3mm的DSC均高于Rd+EDMP、Rd（P<0.05）， Rd 方法下心脏的DSC略大于Rd+EDMP（P=0.02）。不同配准方法下靶区累积剂量表现为：Rd+DMP、Rd+EDMP方法下 PGTV的D50%、Dmean略低于Rd 方法（P=0.035, 0.044）。Rd+DMP 方法下PGTV的V100%稍高于DMP（P=0.026），且比Rd+ EDMP 方法高0.653%（P=0.008）。Rd+DMP 方法下PGTV-nd 的D98%、V105% 略高于DMP（P=0.046，0.023），Rd 方法下 PGTV-nd 的V100%分别比DMP、Rd+DMP方法高2.118%、2.137%（P=0.028，0.037）。PTV1 在不同配准方法下累积剂量均 无统计学意义（P>0.05）。4 种不同配准方法下OAR累积剂量表现相对一致，DMP 方法下肺的V10 Gy、V20 Gy、V30 Gy、V40 Gy、 Dmean及心脏的V20 Gy、V30 Gy、V40 Gy、Dmean均低于Rd方法（P<0.05）。同样，DMP方法所得脊髓的Dmean均分别比Rd+DMP、Rd+ EDMP方法低（P<0.05）。肝和脊髓外扩3 mm在以上4种配准方法下累积剂量的剂量学分析中，各参数均无统计学意义。 结论：DMP、Rd+DMP配准精度相对较优、且DMP方法下OAR累积剂量一致性低于其它3种配准方法，故DMP方法可作 为晚期食管癌自适应放疗累积剂量评估的优选方案。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effects of different registration algorithms on the cumulative dose of adaptive radiation therapy for advanced esophageal cancer and to provide guidance for clinical application. Methods Eleven patients with inoperable advanced esophageal cancer were selected and their two-course radiotherapy plans were imported in Velocity sofware, with CTA image obtained in the second course of treatment as primary image and CTB obtained in the first course of treatment as secondary image. Four registration algorithms, namely Rigid (Rd), Deformable Multi Pass (DMP), Rigid+ Deformable Multi Pass (Rd+DMP), Rigid+Extended Deformable Multi Pass (Rd+EDMP), were chosen for image registration and dose accumulation. The registration accuracies of different registration algorithms were evaluated by the Dice similarity index (DSC) of organs-at-risk (OAR), and the differences in the cumulative dose of target areas and OAR under the registrations by different algorithms were analyzed by paired-t test and rank sum test. Results The DSC of liver, spinal cord and spinal cord with an expansion of 3 mm (spinal cord03) under the registration by DMP and Rd+DMP were higher than those obtained by Rd+EDMP and Rd (P<0.05), and the heart DSC obtained by Rd was slightly higher than that obtained by Rd+EDMP (P=0.02). The cumulative dose of target areas under the registrations by different algorithms showed that the D50% and Dmean of PGTV under the registrations by Rd+DMP and Rd+EDMP were slightly lower than those under the registration by Rd (P=0.035, P=0.044). The V100% of PGTV obtained by Rd+DMP was slightly higher than that obtained by DMP (P=0.026) and was 0.653% higher than that obtained by Rd+EDMP (P=0.008). The D98% and V105% of PGTV-nd obtained by Rd+DMP were slightly higher than those obtained by DMP (P=0.046, P=0.023), and the PGTV-nd V100% under the registration by Rd were 2.118% and 2.137% higher than that under the registration by DMP and Rd+DMP, respectively (P =0.028, P=0.037). There was no significant difference in the cumulative dose of PTV1 among all registrations (P>0.05). The cumulative doses of OAR under the 4 different registration algorithms were relatively consistent. The V10 Gy,V20 Gy, V30 Gy, V40 Gy, Dmean of the lungs and the V20 Gy，V30 Gy, V40 Gy and Dmean of the heart under the registration by DMP were lower than those under the registration by Rd (P<0.05). Similarly, the Dmean of the heart and spinal cord obtained by DMP was lower than that obtained by Rd+DMP and Rd+EDMP (P<0.05). Moreover, there was no statistical difference in the cumulative doses of liver and spinal cord03. Conclusion DMP and Rd+DMP have a relatively high registration accuracy, and the consistence of OAR cumulative dose under the registration by DMP was the lowest. Therefore, DMP can be used for the evaluation of cumulative dose of adaptive radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 健,岳海振,张艺宝,等.CT与CBCT图像配准范围选择的对比研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):21.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.006]
[2]刘 婷,吴 剑.基于解剖特征点的肝脏超声与CT图像配准研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.013]
[3]沈奕晨,聂生东.锥形束CT与螺旋CT图像配准算法及其在放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.013]
[4]王远军,周密,查珊珊,等.多模态医学图像配准技术研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(03):4125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.03.010]
[5]周露,张书旭,余辉,等.PET-CT图像配准的预处理研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4392.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.012]
[6]沈奕晨,蒋马伟.肿瘤调强放射治疗中子宫活动度[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.033]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(9):604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.033]
[7]董晓庆,胡杰,陆春花,等.前列腺癌图像引导放射治疗精准度评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(7):658.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(9):658.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.003]
[8]余辉,张书旭.金属施源器对盆腔部位图像配准的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(7):683.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(9):683.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.008]
[9]孟宏宇,段侪杰,旷雅唯,等.一种适用于运动样本的FPM成像校正方案[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(10):1017.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.10.009]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(9):1017.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.10.009]
[10]蒋璐,邱小平,单国平,等. 鼻咽癌放疗中摆位误差及解剖结构变化对剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(4):348.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.04.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-11-27 【基金项目】广东省自然科学基金（2017A030310217）；广州市珠江科技新星专项（201710010162）；湖北省重点实验室开放课题（PJS140011504）；大 学生创新创业训练计划（202013902065, 202013902062, 20191390109, 201813902075, 201813902071） 【作者简介】张嘉蓉，研究方向：放射治疗技术，E-mail: 18718961849@qq.com 【通信作者】黄思娟，硕士，助理工程师，研究方向：放射物理，E-mail: huangsj@sysucc.org.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-25