[1]袁惠萍,何婉玲,梁月娥,等. 空气净化与紫外线在介入手术室空气消毒效果比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):981-984.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.022]
　YUAN Huiping,HE Wanling,LIANG Yuee,et al. Comparison between air purification equipment and ultraviolet radiation for the air disinfection of interventional room[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(8):981-984.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.022]
点击复制

 空气净化与紫外线在介入手术室空气消毒效果比较()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第8期
页码:
981-984
栏目:
医学生物物理
出版日期:
2019-08-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison between air purification equipment and ultraviolet radiation for the air disinfection of interventional room
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）08-0981-04
作者:
 袁惠萍; 何婉玲; 梁月娥; 王志英
 广州医科大学附属第三医院放射科介入室， 广东 广州 510150
Author(s):
 YUAN Huiping;  HE Wanling;  LIANG Yue’e;  WANG Zhiying
 Interventional Room, Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
关键词:
 ; 空气净化; 紫外线; 手术室; 消毒
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: air purification;  ultraviolet radiation;  interventional room;  disinfection
分类号:
R187；R312
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：比较独立单元空气净化器和紫外线消毒对介入手术室空气消毒效果，探讨空气净化器和紫外线消毒的临床应用价值。方法：分别利用空气净化器和紫外线灯对介入手术室进行相同时间处理，用平板自然沉淀法分别对比两种处理方式对介入手术室自然菌的消毒效果，同时回顾性分析广州医科大学附属第三医院2015年1月~2016年12月两种消毒方式处理后5 830名手术病人术后感染情况。结果：在经过24个月相同时间处理后，紫外线灯对介入手术室自然菌的杀菌率达85.04%（283.1/332.9），而空气净化器对介入手术室自然菌的杀菌率达83.72%（283.05/338.1），两种方法消毒后空气菌落数分别为（43.69±23.08） cfu/m3和（45.87±18.13） cfu/m3，介入手术术后感染率分别为0.49%（15/3 050）和0.29%（8/2 780）；两种方法的杀菌效果、空气菌落数及介入手术术后感染率均无显著性差异（P>0.05）。结论：空气净化消毒效果与紫外线无异，然而由于其可持续使用，贯穿手术过程且对人体无害，空气净化消毒器应作为介入手术室消毒的首要选择。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To assess the air disinfection effects of air purification equipment vs ultraviolet radiation for interventional room and discuss their clinical application values. Methods Air purification equipment and ultraviolet radiation were applied individually for the same time to achieve the air disinfection of interventional room. Air bacteria were collected with plates before and after air disinfection, thereby evaluating the air disinfection effects. After the air disinfection with two kinds of methods, the postoperative infection rates of 5 830 patients who were treated in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2015 to December 2016 were respectively analyzed. Results After the disinfection treatment for 24 months, ultraviolet radiation and air purification equipment had a sterilizing rate of 85.04% (283.1/332.9) and 83.72% (283.05/338.1) against air bacteria in interventional room. The number of air bacteria rates after the disinfection with air purification equipment and ultraviolet radiation were (43.69±23.08) cfu/m3 and (45.87±18.13) cfu/m3, respectively, and the postoperative infection rates were 0.49%(15/3 050) and 0.29%(8/2 780). No significant difference was found between air purification equipment and ultraviolet radiation regarding sterilizing effect, number of air bacteria and postoperative infection rate (P>0.05). Conclusion Air purification equipment which has a disinfection effect similar to that of ultraviolet radiation should be the first choice for the disinfection of interventional room, because it can be used continuously and throughout the operation and is harmless to human.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2019-01-13
【作者简介】袁惠萍，主管护师，研究方向：心血管导管介入护理管理，E-mail: 776508932@qq.com
【通讯作者】何婉玲，副主任护师，研究方向：介入治疗护理，E-mail: hewanling@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-27