[1]葛瑞刚,解传滨,戴相昆,等.D2SRS两种照射技术与CyberKnife在脑转移瘤立体定向放疗中的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(3):265-269.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.001]
　GE Ruigang,XIE Chuanbin,DAI Xiangkun,et al.Dosimetric comparison of two kinds of radiation techniques of D2SRS and CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(3):265-269.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.001]
点击复制

D2SRS两种照射技术与CyberKnife在脑转移瘤立体定向放疗中的剂量学研究()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第3期
页码:
265-269
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dosimetric comparison of two kinds of radiation techniques of D2SRS and CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）03-0265-05
作者:
葛瑞刚; 解传滨; 戴相昆; 李纪伟; 陈高翔; 徐寿平; 曲宝林
中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心放射治疗科， 北京 100853
Author(s):
GE Ruigang;  XIE Chuanbin;  DAI Xiangkun;  LI Jiwei;  CHEN Gaoxiang;  XU Shouping;  QU Baolin
Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
关键词:
脑转移瘤; 立体定向放疗; 微光刀; 射波刀; 剂量学
Keywords:
Keywords: brain metastases;  stereotactic radiotherapy;  D2SRS;  CyberKnife;  dosimetry
分类号:
R318；R739.41
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：分析基于常规加速器的微光刀（D2SRS）系统两种照射技术在脑转移瘤放疗中的剂量学特性，并与射波刀（CyberKnife, CK）进行比较，探讨D2SRS在脑转移瘤立体定向放疗的可行性。方法：选取30例已行CK治疗的脑转移瘤病例，分别设计动态调强（DMLC-IMRT）和动态适形拉弧（DCA）两种D2SRS计划，分析其剂量学特性并与CK计划进行比较。结果：3种计划均能实现处方剂量要求，CK计划具有较好的靶区适形度指数（CI, CI=0.82±0.04），但剂量均匀性指数（HI, HI=0.42±0.11）最差。DMLC-IMRT计划具有与CK计划相当的靶区CI（0.80±0.07, P=0.24），且具有更好的HI（0.28±0.13, P=0.00）；DCA计划CI（0.69±0.09）最低，但其HI（0.33±0.11）优于CK计划。靶区外剂量跌落方面CK计划更具优势，但相较于DCA计划无统计学意义（P=0.06）；在实施时间上，DMLC-IMRT计划［（16.94±1.50） min］与DCA计划［（12.67±0.52） min］相较于CK计划［（38.76±5.60） min］具有明显优势。结论：3种技术均能实现处方剂量要求且CK计划具有更好的靶区适形度，靶区外剂量跌落方面DCA计划优于DMLC-IMRT计划且接近CK计划水平，但在实施效率上两种D2SRS计划具有明显优势，能够在脑转移瘤放疗中更为高效地实现对肿瘤靶区的均匀照射，具有一定的临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To analyze the dosimetric characteristics of two radiation techniques of D2SRS system on conventional accelerator in the radiotherapy for brain metastases, and to compare the two techniques with CyberKnife (CK) for exploring the feasibility of D2SRS in the stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Methods Thirty patients with brain metastases who were treated with CK were enrolled in the study, and two different D2SRS plans, namely DMLC-IMRT plan and DCA plan, were designed for each patient. The dosimetric characteristics of two D2SRS plans were analyzed and then compared with those of CK plan. Results All 3 kinds of plans met the prescription dose requirements. Among them, CK plan had the best conformity index (CI=0.82±0.04) and the highest homogeneity index (HI=0.42±0.11); the CI in DMLC-IMRT plan was similar to that in CK plan (0.80±0.07 vs 0.82±0.04, P=0.24), and the HI in DMLC-IMRT plan was lower than that in CK plan (0.28±0.13 vs 0.42±0.11, P=0.00); moreover, DCA plan had the lowest CI (0.69 ±0.09) and a HI (0.33±0.11) lower than CK plan. CK technique had more advantages in dose gradient outside the target areas, but there was no statistical significance compared with DCA plan (P=0.06). The delivery time of DMLC-IMRT plan and DCA plan was (16.94±1.50) min and (12.67±0.52) min, respectively, obviously shorter than (38.76±5.60) min in CK plan. Conclusion All 3 kinds of techniques meet the prescription dose requirements. CK plan has better performances in CI, while DCA plan is superior to DMLC-IMRT and close to CK plan in terms of dose gradient outside target area. Because of the significant advantages in delivery efficiency, two D2SRS plans can achieve an uniform irradiation in the radiotherapy for brain metastases more efficiently, having certain clinical application value. Keywords: brain metastases; stereotactic radiotherapy; D2SRS; CyberKnife; dosimetry

相似文献/References:

[1]任信信,戴建荣,张 岳,等.基于专家库的γ射线立体定向放疗计划优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):301.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.001]
[2]刘建庭,王晋丽,郭瑞嵩,等.简化调强技术在脑转移瘤外照射中应用的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.005]
[3]宁丽华,赵桂芝,张磊,等.全脑放疗伴随1~4 个脑转移瘤同期加量不同调强技术的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(2):128.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.02.005]
[4]段小娟,周一兵,钱金栋.脑转移瘤调强放疗最佳子野数目[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(7):668.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):668.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.005]
[5]张平,戴鹏,罗龙辉,等. 准直器角度对颅内两个脑转移瘤容积旋转调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1399.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006]
　ZHANG Ping,DAI Peng,LUO Longhui,et al. Effects of collimator angle on volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for two brain metastases [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(3):1399.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006]
[6]邓官华,黄爱花,陈丽霞,等.准直器角度误差对脑转移瘤VMAT计划Gamma通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(12):1411.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.009]
　DENG Guanhua,HUANG Aihua,CHEN Lixia,et al.Effects of collimator angle error on Gamma passing rates for volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for intracranial metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(3):1411.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.009]
[7]曾嵘,陈鹏,王杰,等.脑转移瘤同期加量混合调强放疗与调强放疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(6):671.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.003]
　ZENG Rong,CHEN Peng,WANG Jie,et al.Dosimetric comparison of Hybrid-IMRT vs IMRT for radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(3):671.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.003]
[8]袁玲,刘颖,徐瑶瑶,等.SRS MapCHECK与EDOSE在立体定向放疗计划剂量验证中的对比[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(1):23.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.01.004]
　YUAN Ling,LIU Ying,XU Yaoyao,et al.Comparison of dose verification by SRS MapCHECK versus EDOSE for stereotactic radiotherapy[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(3):23.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.01.004]
[9]刘登洪,王雪桃,钟仁明.几何不确定性鲁棒优化在肝癌立体定向放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(2):162.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.02.006]
　LIU Denghong,WANG Xuetao,ZHONG Renming.Application of geometric uncertainty-based robust optimization in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(3):162.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.02.006]
[10]黎嘉敏,区杰浩,李晓丹,等.对比增强磁敏感加权成像序列与肺癌脑转移瘤检出的相关性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(5):556.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.05.006]
　LI Jiamin,OU Jiehao,et al.Correlation between contrast-enhanced SWI sequence and detection of brain metastases from lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(3):556.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.05.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-10-22 【基金项目】国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0112105）；解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金（2017FC-WJFWZX-04） 【作者简介】葛瑞刚，在读硕士，物理师，主管技师，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: gangzi_8888@163.com 【通信作者】解传滨，硕士，物理师，副主任技师，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理与精确放射治疗，E-mail: xiechuanbin2003@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-02