[1]胡志纲,刘勇强,任建,等.胃癌术后不同布野方案对调强放疗剂量分布的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(12):1400-1405.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.007]
　HU Zhigang,LIU Yongqiang,REN Jian,et al.Effects of different field arrangements on the dose distribution of postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gastric cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(12):1400-1405.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.007]
点击复制

胃癌术后不同布野方案对调强放疗剂量分布的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第12期
页码:
1400-1405
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different field arrangements on the dose distribution of postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gastric cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）12-1400-06
作者:
胡志纲; 刘勇强; 任建; 张红
宝鸡市中心医院放疗科， 陕西 宝鸡 721000
Author(s):
HU Zhigang;  LIU Yongqiang;  REN Jian;  ZHANG Hong
Department of Radiotherapy, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji 721000, China
关键词:
胃癌; 调强放射治疗; 布野方案; 剂量学
Keywords:
gastric cancer;  intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  field arrangement;  dosimetry
分类号:
R815；R735.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：探究胃癌术后不同布野方案对调强放疗剂量分布的影响。方法：选择42例行胃癌术后放疗的患者，采用7野等角度均分静态调强计划（方案A，射野方向为0°、52°、104°、156°、214°、256°、308°）、5野等角度均分静态调强计划（方案B，射野方向为0°、72°、144°、216°、288°）及4野固定照射野静态调强计划（方案C，射野方向为20°、90°、180°、310°），比较不同布野方式下靶区、危及器官受量及靶区适形度指数、均匀性指数差异。结果：不同射野计划方案靶区受量指数及均匀性指数比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但方案A的适形度指数显著优于方案B、C（P<0.05）。不同射野计划方案脊髓Dmax及Dmean、肝脏V30和Dmean、左右肾脏V20和Dmean等方面差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。方案A的脊髓Dmax及Dmean、肝脏V30以及右肾V20等参数优于方案B（P<0.05）；方案C的肝脏V30和Dmean以及左右肾脏V20和Dmean均显著优于方案A、B（P<0.05）。结论：在胃癌术后放疗中，4野静态调强计划能在保证靶区剂量的同时，可更好地保护危及器官。 【关键词】胃癌；调强放射治疗；布野方案；剂量学
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of different field arrangements on the dose distribution of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after the operation for gastric cancer. Methods A total of 42 gastric cancer patients scheduled for postoperative radiotherapy were enrolled in the study. The plan schemes for enrolled gastric cancer patients included static 7-field IMRT (plan A, with beam orientations of 0°, 52°, 104°, 156°, 214°, 256°, 308°), static 5-field IMRT (plan B, with beam orientations of 0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, 288°) and static 4- field IMRT (plan C, with beam orientations of 20°, 90°, 180°, 310°). The differences in the doses to target areas and organs-at-risk as well as the conformity index and homogeneity index of target areas were compared among 3 plans with different field arrangements. Results The comparison on the doses to target areas and homogeneity index showed that there was no significant difference among different plans (P>0.05), but the conformity index of plan A was significantly higher than that of plans B and C (P<0.05). There were statistical differences in the Dmax and Dmean of spinal cord, the V30 and Dmean of liver, the V20 and Dmean of left and right kidney among 3 plans with different field arrangements (P<0.05). The Dmax and Dmean of spinal cord, the V30 of liver and the V20 of right kidney in plan A were superior to those in plan B (P<0.05), and the V30 and Dmean of liver as well as the V20 and Dmean of left and right kidney in plan C were significantly better than those in plans A and B (P<0.05). Conclusion Static 4-field IMRT as the postoperative radiotherapy for gastric cancer can better protect the organs-at-risk while ensuring the doses to target areas.

相似文献/References:

[1]史贵连,叶福丽.PTW729二维矩阵的平面剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.020]
[2]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[3]巩汉顺,王金媛,丛小虎,等.晚期胰腺癌适形、简化调强及螺旋断层放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.003]
[4]易伟松,刘文强,陆 东,等.高光谱成像结合化学计量学诊断胃癌组织[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(01):124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.01.028]
[5]曾 彪,张九堂,席许平,等.单中心上下半野技术在胸中上段食管癌放射治疗中的剂量学分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):357.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.012]
[6]史贵连,叶福丽.肺癌调强放疗计划的设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.013]
[7]陈炳周,路俊哲,侯 氢.不同设计方式的调强逆向治疗计划比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):391.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.020]
[8]周 钢,田 野,陆雪官,等.同步加量技术应用于脑胶质瘤术后调强放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(02):4727.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.02.002]
[9]宋 威,赵 迪,鹿 红,等.射野方向优化技术在胸中上段食管癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5109.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.003]
[10]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[11]宋威,赵迪,鹿红,等.胃癌术后调强放疗射野角度优化的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):815.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.012]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(12):815.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.012]
[12]卢晓光,刘细友,郑言宏,等.胃癌术后不同IMRT布野方式对剂量分布的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(7):664.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.004]
[13]蒋大振,刘晖,戴静,等. 胃癌调强放疗中多叶光栅3种状态的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(2):166.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.02.009]
　JIANG Dazhen,LIU Hui,DAI Jing,et al. Dosimetric comparison among split-field, fixed-jaw and rotating multi-leaf collimator in the radiotherapy of gastric carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(12):166.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.02.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-06-22 【基金项目】陕西省自然科学基金（2014JM4191） 【作者简介】胡志纲，主管技师，研究方向：放射物理及放疗设备的维修保养，E-mail: dabebzhu@163.com 【通信作者】刘勇强，主治医师，研究方向：肿瘤放疗，E-mail: Zhigangh- 2002@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-24