[1]裴运通,胡金炎,马阳光,等. Monaco计划系统计算网格对头颈部肿瘤小体积危及器官的剂量学影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(10):1145-1151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.006]
　PEI Yuntong,HU Jinyan,MA Yangguang,et al. Dosimetric impact of computational grid size in Monaco treatment planning system on small organs-at-risk in patients with head and neck cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(10):1145-1151.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.006]
点击复制

 Monaco计划系统计算网格对头颈部肿瘤小体积危及器官的剂量学影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第10期
页码:
1145-1151
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-10-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dosimetric impact of computational grid size in Monaco treatment planning system on small organs-at-risk in patients with head and neck cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）10-1145-07
作者:
 裴运通; 胡金炎; 马阳光; 王海洋; 刘乐乐; 姬腾飞; 郭跃信
 郑州大学第一附属医院放射治疗部， 河南 郑州 453003
Author(s):
 PEI Yuntong;  HU Jinyan;  MA Yangguang;  WANG Haiyang;  LIU Lele;  JI Tengfei;  GUO Yuexin
 Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 453003, China
关键词:
 ; Monaco; 计算网格; 小体积危及器官; 剂量学
Keywords:
 ; Monaco;  computational grid;  small organs-at-risk;  dosimetry
分类号:
R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.10.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：探讨Monaco计划系统中计算网格对头颈部肿瘤小体积危及器官剂量学影响。方法：选取10例头颈部NKT（结外NK/T细胞淋巴瘤）患者，Monaco计划系统按不同计算网格分A、B两组制作计划。A组以3 mm网格优化，以1、2、4、5 mm网格重新计算剂量生成新计划；B组按1、2、3、4、5 mm网格直接优化计划。A、B两组计划其它参数均保持不变，归一到处方剂量包绕95%靶区体积。统计晶体及计划敏感器官体积（PRV）、视交叉和视神经最大、最小和平均剂量、靶区CI和HI，剂量重新计算与优化时间。以1 mm网格数据为参考，采用配对t检验对上述结果进行统计分析。结果：2 mm与1 mm网格配对t检验A组右晶体PRV、右视神经和视交叉有统计学差异（P<0.05），B组右晶体PRV和视交叉有统计学差异，其它危及器官（OAR）均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。3 mm与1 mm网格配对t检验所有OAR均无统计学差异。4 mm与1 mm网格配对t检验A、B两组晶体及PRV除B组右晶体PRV外均有统计学差异，而视神经和视交叉均无统计学差异。5 mm与1 mm网格配对t检验A、B两组晶体及PRV均有统计学差异，视神经和视交叉除A组视交叉外均无统计学差异。1 mm网格A、B两组OAR的剂量学参数、靶区的CI和HI没有统计学差异，B组计划所需时间是A组的4倍。结论：较之于视神经和视交叉，晶体及PRV对计算网格变化更敏感。Monaco计划系统兼顾计算精度和工作效率，头颈部肿瘤采用3 mm计算网格是合适的选择。当临床需要1 mm网格数据时，可采用3 mm网格优化并重新计算到1 mm网格剂量的方法。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the dosimetric effects of computational grid size in Monaco treatment planning system on the small organs-at-risk (OAR) in patients with head and neck cacer. Methods Ten patients with head and neck NKT (extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma) were enrolled in the study, and two groups (groups A and B) of radiotherapy plan with different grid sizes were designed by Monaco treatment planning system. The plans in group A were optimized with 3 mm grid, and then 4 new plans were obtained by recalculating the final dose with the grid of 1, 2, 4 and 5 mm; in group B, 5 plans were generated with different grids (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm). The other parameters in groups A and B remain unchanged, and the dose distribution was normalized to a prescription dose of 95% of planning target volume. The maximum, minimum and mean doses of lens, planning organ at risk volume (PRV) of lens, optic chiasm and optic nerve, the homogeneity index and conformity index of target areas, the time for dose recalculation and optimization were analyzed. Paired t test was used to analyze the obtained results, using 1 mm grid data as the reference. Results The paired t test on 2 mm grid and 1 mm grid showed that there was no statistical differences in OAR (P>0.05), except for PRV of the right lens, the right optic nerve and optic chiasm in group A (P<0.05) as well as the PRV of the right lens and optic chiasm in group B (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in OAR between 3 mm grid and 1 mm grid. There were statistical differences in groups A and B between 4 mm grid and 1 mm grid, except for the optic nerve and optic chiasm in groups A and B, and PRV of the right lens in group B. The paired t test on 5 mm grid and 1 mm grid showed that there were statistical differences in lens and lens PRV in groups A and B, and optic chiasm in group A, not in the optic nerve in groups A and B and optic chiasm in group B. There was no statistical difference in the dose parameters of OAR, and the CI and HI of target areas between group A (1 mm grid) and group B (1 mm grid). The time required in group B was 4 times longer than that in group A. Conclusion Compared with optic nerve and optic chiasm, lens and PRV of lens are more sensitive to computational grid size. For the accurate calculation as well as efficiency, using a grid size of 3 mm appears to be the most appropriate choice. For the clinical needs of 1 mm dose grid data, the plan can be firstly optimized by 3 mm grid and then recalculated using 1 mm grid.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭跃信,王海洋,马阳光,等.Monaco治疗计划系统的剂量学性能测试验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(1):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.012]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.012]
[2]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[3]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[4]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[5]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[6]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[7]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[8]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[9]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[10]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(10):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2019-05-11
【基金项目】河南省医学科技攻关计划（201602035）；河南省科技厅科技攻关计划（182102310369）
【作者简介】裴运通，硕士，助理工程师，研究方向：放射物理技术，E-mail: seabrezer@foxmail.com
【通信作者】郭跃信，科主任，研究方向：放射物理技术，E-mail: guoyx0371@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-30