[1]蔡汉飞,方美芳,徐露,等. Gafchromic EBT3胶片在螺旋断层放射治疗计划验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(11):1257-1260.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.004]
　CAI Hanfei,FANG Meifang,XU Lu,et al. Application of Gafchromic EBT3 film in the verification of TomoTherapy plan[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(11):1257-1260.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.004]
点击复制

 Gafchromic EBT3胶片在螺旋断层放射治疗计划验证中的应用()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第11期
页码:
1257-1260
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-11-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Application of Gafchromic EBT3 film in the verification of TomoTherapy plan
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）11-1257-04
作者:
 蔡汉飞1; 2; 方美芳1; 徐露1; 梁保辉2; 曹露1; 葛文洁1
 1.蚌埠医学院第一附属医院肿瘤放疗科， 安徽 蚌埠 233004； 2.蚌埠医学院医学影像系， 安徽 蚌埠 233030
Author(s):
 CAI Hanfei1; 2;  FANG Meifang1;  XU Lu1;  LIANG Baohui2;  CAO Lu1;  GE Wenjie1
 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China; 2. Department of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, China
关键词:
 ; Gafchromic EBT3胶片; 螺旋断层放射治疗; 放射治疗计划验证; Gamma指数分析
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: Gafchromic EBT3 film;  TomoTherapy;  plan verification;  Gamma index analysis
分类号:
R812
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.11.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：评估基于Gafchromic EBT3胶片的剂量测量系统用于螺旋断层放射治疗计划验证的可靠性，确定该系统的正确使用方法。 方法：使用Gafchromic EBT3胶片和Vidar DosimetryPro Advantage Red扫描仪组成的剂量测量系统，测试并确定系统的一些重要特性对测量结果的影响。此外，使用该系统验证螺旋断层放射治疗计划，借助Gamma指数分析对胶片测量的剂量分布与计划系统计算结果之间进行比较。 结果：胶片辐照后一开始透光度随时间变化比较明显，直到约4 h以后胶片着色渐趋饱和，4 h内扫描值变化最高达11.6%。扫描仪扫描重复性相对标准差小于0.5%。胶片正反方向放置扫描结果之间差别小于0.6%、横向和纵向放置扫描结果之间差别最高达7.0%。Gamma参数设置为3%/3 mm时，横向和纵向放置扫描验证平均通过率分别为96.5%±2.9%和95.7%±3.6%，方差分析显示两种扫描方式的验证通过率在a=0.05水平上没有统计学差异。 结论：使用文中的胶片剂量测量系统时，应居中放置扫描，并使验证胶片和刻度胶片保持相同的扫描方向。通过直接建立扫描值与胶片吸收剂量之间的一一对应关系，将验证胶片的扫描值转换成吸收剂量的方法简便易行。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability of applying Gafchromic EBT3 film-based dosimetry system for the verification of TomoTherapy plan, and to validate the correct usage of the system. Methods The film dosimetry system is composed of Gafchromic EBT3 film and Vidar DosimetryPro Advantage Red scanner. The most important characteristics of the system were investigated to determine the main influencing factors. The system was used to verify TomoTherapy plan, and the comparison of the calculated and measured dose distributions was performed using Gamma index analysis. Results The transmittance changed with time obviously after irradiation until about 4 hours later when the coloration was nearly saturated. The largest difference of scan values within 4 hours was up to 11.6%. The relative standard deviation of the repeatability of scanner was less than 0.5%. The differences of scan values between film in face-up and face-down positions were less than 0.6%, while the largest difference of scan values between landscape and portrait orientations was up to 7.0%. The Gamma analysis with a criterion of 3%/3 mm showed that the average passing rates of landscape and portrait orientations were 96.5%±2.9% and 95.7%±3.6%, respectively. Analysis of variance showed that there is no statistical difference between both orientations (a=0.05). Conclusion When using a film dosimetry system as discussed in this research, the film should be placed in the center of scanning area, and verification film and calibration film should be maintained at the same scan direction. By directly establishing one-to-one correspondence between the scan values and the absorbed doses of film, it is easy and feasible to convert the scan values of the verification film into absorbed doses.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(11):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-06-11
【基金项目】蚌埠医学院科技发展基金项目（BYKF1773）
【作者简介】蔡汉飞，物理师，高级工程师，研究方向：医学物理，E-mail: hfcai545@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-22