[1]何亚男,罗焕丽,靳富,等. 不同重建方式下CT层厚对胸部肿瘤体积和剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(3):249-255.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.03.001]
　HE Yanan,LUO Huanli,JIN Fu,et al. Effects of computed tomography slice thickness on clinical target volume and dose in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for chest cancer based on different reconstruction methods[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(3):249-255.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.03.001]
点击复制

 不同重建方式下CT层厚对胸部肿瘤体积和剂量的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第3期
页码:
249-255
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effects of computed tomography slice thickness on clinical target volume and dose in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for chest cancer based on different reconstruction methods
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）03-0249-07
作者:
 何亚男; 罗焕丽; 靳富; 杨丁懿; 黄锣
 重庆市肿瘤研究所/医院/癌症中心， 重庆 400030
Author(s):
 HE Ya’nan;  LUO Huanli;  JIN Fu;  YANG Dingyi;  HUANG Luo
 Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Chongqing 400030, China
关键词:
 ; 胸部肿瘤; CT层厚; 影像重建; 调强放疗; 危及器官
Keywords:
 ; chest tumor;  computed tomography slice thickness;  image reconstruction;  intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  organs-at-risk
分类号:
R737.9；R815.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.03.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：基于两种不同的重建方式，分析CT层厚对胸部肿瘤靶区体积、剂量和危及器官受量的影响。 方法：随机选取11例胸部肿瘤患者（主要为食管癌、肺癌和乳腺癌），获取层厚2 mm的CT影像（2-CT）并将其传至放疗计划系统（Eclipse 10.0）中，分别基于靶区最大层面（方法1）和定标金属小球所在层面（方法2）作为起始层进行重建，得到层厚为4、6、8、10 mm的CT影像（4-CT、6-CT、8-CT、10-CT）。由医生在2-CT影像上勾画靶区和危及器官，并将其复制到其余层厚的影像中。同样基于2-CT影像中设计调强放疗（IMRT）计划，随后将其复制到其余层厚影像中重新计算。统计两种重建方法得到的各层厚影像中的靶体积和剂量，并以2-CT数据为基准加以比较。 结果：两种重建方式中，靶体积的相对变化随着层厚的增大逐渐增大。当靶体积为1.3 cm3时，10-CT中相对偏差两种方法均高达84.62%，8-CT时两种方法相对偏差分别为38.46%、84.62%；体积为30~100 cm3时，各层厚的体积测量偏差方法1均小于方法2；体积>100 cm3时，两种方法中靶体积基本不随层厚而改变。适形指数相对变化随着层厚的变大而变大，对于小体积靶区（<30 cm3），两种方法在10-CT中相对变化率分别为13.60%、11.18%，在8-CT时为6.56%、13.18%，在6-CT和4-CT时均小于等于5.08%；体积在30~100 cm3时，方法1相对变化率为1.29%~3.03%，方法2为1.34%~5.42%；大体积靶区受层厚的影响小，均<1.38%。两种重建方法的均匀性指数相对变化率只在小体积时随层厚增大有小幅度增加，在8-CT、10-CT时相对偏差较大，方法1为12.95%、17.42%，方法2为16.15%、15.43%。两种重建方式得到的IMRT计划中，脊髓的最小值、平均值，肺的V5、V30，心脏的V30、V40受层厚影响显著（P<0.05）。结论：在胸部肿瘤放疗中，基于靶区最大层面为起始层的重建方式优于基于定标金属小球所在层面为起始层的重建。同时，本研究可以为改进现有的CT扫描流程提供依据。
Abstract:
 Objective To evaluate the effects of different computed tomography (CT) slice thicknesses on the volume and dose of target areas and organs-at-risk of patients with chest cancer based on two different reconstruction methods. Methods Eleven patients with chest cancer (mainly, esophagus cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer) were enrolled in the study. The CT images with 2 mm slice thickness (2-CT) were transferred to Eclipse 10.0 treatment planning system. The images with different slice thicknesses (4, 6, 8 and 10 mm), namely 4-CT, 6-CT, 8-CT and 10-CT, were reconstructed by two methods. In Method 1, the largest target layer was taken as the starting layer, while in Method 2, the metal marker layer was treated as the starting layer. The target areas and organs-at-risk were delineated on 2-CT images and then were copied slice by slice on CT images with different slice thicknesses. Similarly, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were developed on the 2-CT images and then were copied on the other CT images. The target volume and doses were computed independently for each image. The results on 2-CT images were chosen as the reference standard. Results The target volume in two reconstruction methods was gradually increasing with the increase of slice thickness. When the target area was 1.3 cm3, the volume deviation on 10-CT images in two methods was up to 84.62% and the deviation on 8-CT images was 38.46% (Method 1) and 84.62% (Method 2). For the target volume of 30-100 cm3, the volume changes in Method 1 were significantly smaller than that in Method 2; for target volume larger than 100 cm3, the deviation was trivial, without being increasing with the increase of slice thickness. The changes in radiation conformal index (CI) were gradually larger as the thickness increased. The changes in CI of small targets (<30 cm3) were particularly significant on 8-CT image (6.56% and 13.18% for Method 1 and Method 2, respectively) and 10-CT image (13.60% and 11.18% for Method 1 and Method 2, respectively) and that for larger targets with 30-100 cm3 were 1.29%-3.03% (Method 1) and 1.34%-5.42% (Method 2). Both the variation tendency of CI in Method 1 and Method 2 was less than 1.38%. Nevertheless, the difference of HI between two methods was not obvious. The changes of HI were larger on 8-CT image (12.95% and 16.15% for Method 1 and Method 2, respectively) and 10-CT image (17.42% and 15.43% for Method 1 and Method 2, respectively). The minimum dose, average dose of spinal cord, the V5, V30 of lung, and the V30, V40 of heart in IMRT were significantly affected by CT slice thickness (P<0.05). Conclusion In the IMRT for chest cancer, the reconstruction method based on the largest target layer is superior to that based on the metal marker layer. Meanwhile, the study provides some reference for improving the existing CT scanning process.

相似文献/References:

[1]李桢,洪文松,周凌宏.CT定位增强扫描对胸部肿瘤放疗剂量分布的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):563.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.024]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(3):563.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.024]
[2]柏晗,等.基于四维CT下胸部肿瘤调强计划中心脏和食道的剂量评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(3):293.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.03.015]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):293.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.03.015]
[3]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[4]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[5]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[6]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[7]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[8]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[9]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[10]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(3):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[11]张广鹏,杨波,庞皓文,等. 胸部肿瘤内外照射方式的靶区剂量分布和肺受照剂量[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):570.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.006]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(3):570.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.006]
[12]邵凯南,翁邓胡,李玉成,等. 基于Python脚本的RayStation治疗计划系统逆向调强放疗计划半自动设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(2):156.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.007]
　SHAO Kainan,WENG Denghu,LI Yucheng,et al. Semi-automatic design of inverse intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment plans based on Python scripts in RayStation treatment planning system[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(3):156.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.02.007]
[13]姚雷,夏兵,曾程,等. 不同计划系统胸部肿瘤物理剂量参数比较与分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(5):526.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.05.006]
　YAO Lei,XIA Bing,ZENG Cheng,et al. Comparison and analysis of physical dose parameters between two different planning systems for radiotherapy in thoracic cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(3):526.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.05.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2017-10-13
【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（11575038）；重庆市卫生计生委医学科研项目（2015MSXM229）
【作者简介】何亚男，硕士，助理工程师，研究方向：放疗物理，E-mail: heyanan.1986@163.com
【通信作者】靳富，E-mail: jfazj@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-21