[1]田龙,席强,赵鑫,等. 膀胱癌图像引导放疗中基于软组织灰度值与基于内植标记物的锥形束CT校准比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(1):31-35.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.007]
　TIAN Long,XI Qiang,ZHAO Xin,et al. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography calibrations based on soft tissue grey value and implanted markers in image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(1):31-35.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.007]
点击复制

 膀胱癌图像引导放疗中基于软组织灰度值与基于内植标记物的锥形束CT校准比较()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第1期
页码:
31-35
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-02-07

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of cone beam computed tomography calibrations based on soft tissue grey value and implanted markers in image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）01-0031-05
作者:
 田龙1; 席强1; 赵鑫1; 刘月霞2; 张遵浩3
 1.河北北方学院附属第一医院， 河北 张家口 075000； 2.张家口教育学院， 河北 张家口 075000； 3.河北医科大学第一医院， 河北 石家庄 050000
Author(s):
 TIAN Long1;  XI Qiang1;  ZHAO Xin1;  LIU Yuexia2;  ZHANG Zunhao3
 1. the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, China; 2. Zhangjiakou Educational College, Zhangjiakou 075000, China; 3. the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
关键词:
 ; 膀胱癌; 锥形束CT; 图像引导放疗; 软组织灰度值; 内植标记物
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: bladder cancer;  cone beam computed tomography;  image-guided radiotherapy therapy;  soft tissue grey value;  implanted markers
分类号:
R812
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：锥形束CT的X线容积成像系统（XVI）可执行多种方式校准。本研究目的是评价基于软组织灰度值与同基于膀胱内植标记物的校准方法准确性之间的差异。 方法：所有病人接受锥形束CT图像引导下的常规图像引导放疗。将病人分为基于软组织灰度值自动校准试验组和基于膀胱内植标记物手动校准参考组，在确认标记物准确性后，比较了两种方法在3D空间向量和左右（LR）、头脚（SI）、前后（AP）3个方向上的差异。 结果：两种方法的3D空间向量差异平均值为0.65 cm；左右方向（LR），头脚方向（SI），前后方向（AP）差异平均值分别为0.03、0.45和1.67 cm。 结论：膀胱癌图像引导放疗中基于软组织灰度值的自动校准方法在准确度上劣于基于膀胱内植标记物的手动校准。避免标记物植入和新的图像计算、分析方法是未来发展趋势。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective The X-ray volume imaging system of cone beam computed tomography can perform various ways of calibration. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of calibrations based on soft tissue grey value and bladder implanted markers. Methods All the patients receiving radiotherapy guided by cone beam computed tomography images were divided into two groups, namely experimental group (automatic calibration based on soft tissue grey value) and reference group (manual calibration based on bladder implanted markers). After the accuracy of implanted markers was confirmed, we compared the differences between two calibration methods in three-dimensional spatial vectors and left-right, superior-inferior, anterior-posterior directions. Results The mean differences between two calibration methods in three-dimensional spatial vectors and left-right, superior-inferior, anterior-posterior directions were 0.65, 0.03，0.45 and 1.67 cm, respectively. Conclusion In the image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer, the accuracy of automatic calibration based on soft tissue grey value is lower than that of the manual calibration based on bladder implanted markers. Avoiding implanted markers, new image calculations and analysis methods are the future development trends.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
[11]田龙,席强,赵鑫,等. 膀胱癌图像引导放疗中基于骨骼与基于内植标记物锥形束CT校准比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(6):647.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.006]
　TIAN Long,XI Qiang,ZHAO Xin,et al. Comparison between CBCT calibrations based on skeleton vs implanted markers in image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):647.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2017-08-24
【作者简介】田龙，物理师，主要从事放射物理工作，E-mail: 12774739-
12@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-01-25