[1]闫卓,徐榭,陈志.基于蒙特卡洛方法和数字体模的质子治疗设施屏蔽优化设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(12):1482-1489.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.12.002]
　YAN Zhuo,X. George XU,CHEN Zhi,et al.Shielding optimization of proton therapy facilities based on Monte Carlo simulations and voxelized human phantoms[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(12):1482-1489.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.12.002]
点击复制

基于蒙特卡洛方法和数字体模的质子治疗设施屏蔽优化设计()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第12期
页码:
1482-1489
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Shielding optimization of proton therapy facilities based on Monte Carlo simulations and voxelized human phantoms
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）12-1482-08
作者:
闫卓1; 徐榭1; 2; 陈志1
1.中国科学技术大学物理学院， 安徽 合肥 230026； 2.伦斯勒理工学院核能工程， 美国 纽约 12180
Author(s):
YAN Zhuo1;  X. George XU1;  2;  CHEN Zhi1
1. School of Physical Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China 2. Nuclear Engineering Program, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA
关键词:
质子治疗; 辐射屏蔽; 蒙特卡洛模拟; 体模
Keywords:
proton therapy shielding Monte Carlo simulations phantoms
分类号:
R318；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.12.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：评估采用蒙特卡洛（MC）模拟方法和中国科学技术大学数字人体模型（USTC体模）在质子治疗设施中的辐射屏蔽优化设计。方法：使用MC模拟方法和USTC体模计算数字体模处于不同位置时在不同部位的当量剂量率（EDR），对安徽省合肥市离子医学中心（HIMC）的新型质子治疗设施的屏蔽设计进行评估，并将其与采用经验公式计算得出的EDR进行比较。结果：使用铁靶时，经验公式计算得出的EDR值比MC模拟方法得到的结果偏高27.6倍；使用水靶时，经验公式计算结果较MC模拟结果高36.6倍，说明使用经验公式进行屏蔽计算将使得剂量被高估，从而导致成本增加，不符合辐射防护最优化原则。结论：利用USTC体模对质子治疗设施进行基于MC模拟的屏蔽计算可以得到更加准确和优化的结果。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the shielding optimization of proton therapy facilities by using Monte Carlo (MC) methods and voxelized computational USTC human phantoms(USTC phantoms). Methods The shielding design of a new proton therapy facility in Hefei Ion Medical Center (HIMC) was evaluated through the calculation of the Equivalent Dose Rate (EDR) in different parts of voxelized phantoms at different positions by using MC simulations and USTC phantoms, and the EDR was then compared with the EDR calculated through empirical formulas. Results When iron was used as target。EDR calculated by empirical formulas were 27.6 times higher than that by MC simulations, and when water was used as target, EDR calculated by empirical formulas were 36.6times higher than that by MC simulations. Thus, the dose was overestimated to some degree inempirical formulas, resulting in excessive shielding costs, which does not meet the principle of radiation protection optimization. Conclusion The calculation by using MC simulations and the USTC phantoms can be more accurate and optimized in the shielding evaluation of proton therapy facilities.

相似文献/References:

[1]常城,王若曦,杜乙,等.一种新型质子治疗剂量递送系统的设计研究及模拟验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(7):745.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.07.001]
　CHANG Cheng,WANG Ruoxi,DU Yi,et al.Design and verification of a new compact dose delivery system for proton therapy[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(12):745.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.07.001]
[2]汪金龙,屈卫卫,谢树青,等. 扫描治疗头的蒙特卡罗模型研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(9):1001.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.09.002]
　WANG Jinlong,QU Weiwei,XIE Shuqing,et al. Investigation of a Monte Carlo model of scanning nozzle[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(12):1001.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.09.002]
[3]崔相利,张建光,卢晓明,等.质子治疗技术的发展及其挑战[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(4):404.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.04.002]
　CUI Xiangli,ZHANG Jianguang,et al.Development and challenges of proton therapy[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(12):404.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.04.002]
[4]高楠,王宇翔,刘志鹏,等.ProBeam质子治疗系统辐射屏蔽的防护效果[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(11):1349.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.11.006]
　GAO Nan,WANG Yuxiang,LIU Zhipeng,et al.Effectiveness of radiation shielding design for ProBeam proton therapy system[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(12):1349.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.11.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-07-12 【基金项目】国家重点基础研究发展计划（2017YFC0107504） 【作者简介】闫卓，硕士，研究方向：辐射防护与环境保护，E-mail: yanzhuo@mail.ustc.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-30