[1]陈飞虎,李一江,柏晗,等.宫颈癌放疗中计算网格尺寸对物理剂量和生物剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(8):971-976.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.006]
　CHEN Feihu,LI Yijiang,BAI Han,et al.Effects of dose calculation grid size on physical dose and biological dose in radiotherapy for cervical cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(8):971-976.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.006]
点击复制

宫颈癌放疗中计算网格尺寸对物理剂量和生物剂量的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第8期
页码:
971-976
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-08-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of dose calculation grid size on physical dose and biological dose in radiotherapy for cervical cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）08-0971-06
作者:
陈飞虎; 李一江; 柏晗; 刘旭红; 朱思瑾; 吴星娆
云南省肿瘤医院/昆明医科大学第三附属医院/云南省癌症中心放射治疗科， 云南 昆明 650118
Author(s):
CHEN Feihu;  LI Yijiang;  BAI Han;  LIU Xuhong;  ZHU Sijin;  WU Xingrao
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital/the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming 650118, China
关键词:
宫颈癌; 剂量计算网格尺寸; 物理剂量; 生物剂量
Keywords:
Keywords: cervical cancer dose calculation grid size physical dose biological dose
分类号:
R737.33；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：定量分析剂量计算网格尺寸（DCGS）对宫颈癌放疗中物理剂量和生物剂量的影响。方法：选取Pinnacle3治疗计划系统中宫颈癌的治疗方案12例，取默认值DCGS=4.0 mm的计算网格，优化调整宫颈癌治疗方案，再改变DCGS（1.0～7.0 mm），重新计算靶区和危及器官（OAR）的剂量，探讨靶区和OAR的物理剂量和生物剂量随DCGS的变化情况。结果：靶区和OAR的物理剂量随DCGS的变大而减小，在体积剂量直方图上表现出曲线整体向低剂量区平移。除左右股骨头外，靶区的肿瘤控制概率（TCP）和OAR的正常组织并发症概率（NTCP）也随DCGS增大而缓慢降低。PGTVnd的TCP下降率约为0.7%/mm，PTV的TCP下降率约为0.6%/mm，而膀胱和直肠的NTCP下降速度相对较快，膀胱NTCP下降率最大值为15.0%，直肠NTCP下降率最大值为13.5%。结论：宫颈癌放疗中物理剂量和生物剂量随DCGS变大而减少，靶区和OAR的物理剂量在体积剂量直方图上表现出整体向低剂量区平移，这种变化趋势会诱导研究者低估靶区的TCP及OAR的NTCP。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To quantitatively investigate the effects of dose calculation grid size (DCGS) on the physical dose and biological dose in radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Methods Twelve treatment plans of cervical cancer designed in Pinnacle3 treatment planning system were selected and then optimized with the default DCGS of 4.0 mm. As the DCGS were changed from 1.0 mm to 7.0 mm, the doses of target areas and organs-at-risk (OAR) were recalculated to explore the changes of physical dose and biological dose of target and OAR with different DCGS. Results The physical doses of target areas and OAR were decreased with the increase of DCGS, and the dose-volume curves showed an overall shift to the lower dose region in dose-volume histogram.Except for the NTCP of femoral heads, both the tumor control probability (TCP) of target areas and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of OAR were slowly decreased with the increase of DCGS. The decline rate of TCP of PGTVnd was about 0.7%/mm, and that of TCP of PTV was about 0.6%/mm. However, the decrease rates of NTCP of the bladder and the rectum were relatively faster, and the maximum decrease rate of NTCP was 15.0% for the bladder and 13.5% for the rectum. Conclusion The physical dose and biological dose in radiotherapy for cervical cancer are decreased with the increase of DCGS, and the dose-volume curves of target areas and OAR show an overall shift to the lower dose region in dose-volume histogram, which will induce the underestimations of the TCP of target areas and the NTCP of OAR.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴相昆,杨丰蔚,杜 镭,等.等效均匀剂量优化法在宫颈癌调强计划中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):290.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.033]
[2]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.宫颈癌放疗高危临床靶区变化及其对累计吸收剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):379.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.017]
[3]孙晓欢,周咏春,谭丽娜,等.容积旋转调强与固定野调强在宫颈癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(01):4604.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.01.003]
[4]刘 浩,王 新,李公平,等.用二维电离室矩阵验证宫颈癌腔内放疗剂量分布[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4988.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.004]
[5]余 辉,张书旭.宫颈癌后装治疗剂量的调强优化方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5114.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.004]
[6]查元梓,张松方,屠永清,等.子野权重优化对CMS XiO宫颈癌调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3866.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.007]
[7]张富利,刘清智,张伟超,等.宫颈癌术后盆腔螺旋断层调强放疗两种计划设计方法的剂量学分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4229.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.003]
[8]王佳浩,赖建军,唐荣军,等.结合EPID与EUD方法确定宫颈癌病例靶区最佳生物外放边界的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4378.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.009]
[9]张富利,刘清智,王雅棣,等.基于配置不同类型MLC叶片加速器的宫颈癌术后调强放疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4383.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.010]
[10]刘致滨,王占宇,龙雨松.两种优化技术在宫颈癌术后IMRT计划中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(8):534.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-04-15 【基金项目】云南省科技计划项目（2017FE468（-221）） 【作者简介】陈飞虎，硕士研究生，工程师，研究方向：放射肿瘤物理学的临床应用，E-mail: cmh093@qq.com 【通信作者】吴星娆，E-mail: 13708874297@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-27