[1]邹兰科,邓忠天. 大孔径CT模拟机引导下经皮穿刺肺活检116例临床研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(4):453-456.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.016]
　ZOU Lanke,DENG Zhongtian. Clinical study of 116 cases of percutaneous lung biopsy guided by large-aperture CT simulator[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):453-456.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.016]
点击复制

 大孔径CT模拟机引导下经皮穿刺肺活检116例临床研究()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第4期
页码:
453-456
栏目:
医学影像物理
出版日期:
2019-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Clinical study of 116 cases of percutaneous lung biopsy guided by large-aperture CT simulator
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）04-0453-04
作者:
 邹兰科; 邓忠天
 梧州市红十字会医院呼吸内科， 广西 梧州 543002
Author(s):
 ZOU Lanke;  DENG Zhongtian
 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou 543002, China
关键词:
 ; 大孔径CT; 模拟机; 经皮穿刺肺活检
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: large-aperture CT;  simulator;  percutaneous lung biopsy
分类号:
R563
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：观察和评价分析大孔径CT模拟机引导下经皮穿刺肺活检的临床价值。方法：搜集2011年1月至2014年6月梧州市红十字会医院行普通CT经皮穿刺肺活检的52例患者资料（A组），搜集2014年7月至2018年10月应用大孔径CT模拟机引导下肺穿刺活检的116例患者资料（B组），对两组患者检测的确诊率及并发症发生率进行比较分析。结果：两组穿刺组织标本均送病理检查，显示两组确诊率无显著性差异（P>0.05）。两组一次成功率具有明显差异（53.4% vs 76.7%, P<0.05）。两组患者的并发症发生率无统计学意义（23.1% vs 27.6%, P>0.05）。结论：通过对比普通诊断CT机和大孔径CT模拟机引导下进行经皮穿刺肺活检术，两者对疾病的确诊率均较高，并发症发生率不高，且均没有发生致命性严重并发症。同时大孔径CT模拟机具有孔径大、适合肥胖患者检查、模具应用及定位精准等明显优势，是值得推广的穿刺引导方法。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To observe and evaluate the clinical value of percutaneous lung biopsy guided by large-aperture CT simulator. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients receiving conventional CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital from January 2011 to June 2014 (group A), and those of 116 patients who underwent lung biopsy guided by large-aperture CT simulator from July 2014 to October 2018 (group B) were collected in this study. The diagnostic rates and complication rates of two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Results The biopsy specimens from both groups were sent for pathological examination, and the results showed that there was no significant difference in the diagnosis rate between two groups (P>0.05). The first-attempt success rate for percutaneous lung biopsy in group A and B was 53.4% and 76.7%, respectively, with statistical differences (P<0.05). The complication rates in the two groups were similar, without statistical differences (23.1% vs 27.6%, P>0.05). Conclusion Both of conventional CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy and percutaneous lung biopsy guided by large-aperture CT simulator are considered to have high diagnostic rate and low incidence of complications, without fatal complications. Moreover, large-aperture CT simulator can realize accurate positioning and fixation with vacuum mould, and is suitable for the examination of obese patients because of its large apertures. Percutaneous lung biopsy guided by large-aperture CT simulator is worthy of popularization.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-11-16
【基金项目】梧州市科学研究与技术开发计划（201702005）
【作者简介】邹兰科，研究生，副主任医师，研究方向：呼吸疾病介入诊疗，E-mail: 2968904913@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-23