[1]史玉静,鞠孟阳,胡晓伟,等. 双侧乳腺癌术后IMRT与VMAT的剂量学差异[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(4):384-388.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.003]
　SHI Yujing,JU Mengyang,HU Xiaowei,et al. Dosimetric differences between IMRT and VMAT for bilateral breast cancer in postmastectomy radiotherapy[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):384-388.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.003]
点击复制

 双侧乳腺癌术后IMRT与VMAT的剂量学差异()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第4期
页码:
384-388
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Dosimetric differences between IMRT and VMAT for bilateral breast cancer in postmastectomy radiotherapy
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）04-0384-05
作者:
 史玉静1; 鞠孟阳1; 胡晓伟1; 李金凯2; 王沛沛2; 李彩虹2; 昌志刚2; 孙新臣2; 李顺梅2; 郑海伦2
 1.南京医科大学特种医学系， 江苏 南京 210009； 2.南京医科大学第一附属医院放疗科， 江苏 南京 210029
Author(s):
 SHI Yujing1;  JU Mengyang1;  HU Xiaowei1;  LI Jinkai2;  WANG Peipei2;  LI Caihong2;  CHANG Zhigang2;  SUN Xinchen2;  LI Shunmei2;  ZHENG Hailun2
 1. Department of Special Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China; 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
关键词:
 ; 双侧乳腺癌; 剂量学差异; 容积旋转调强; 调强放疗; 适形度指数; 均匀性指数
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: bilateral breast cancer;  dosimetric difference;  volumetric modulated arc therapy;  intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  conformity index;  homogeneity index
分类号:
R815.6；R737.9；R312
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 【摘要】目的：对比双侧乳腺癌术后放疗的不同治疗技术下靶区及危及器官的剂量学差异，探讨最佳治疗方案。方法：选择8例接受根治或者改良根治手术后的双侧乳腺癌患者，利用三维适形调强治疗系统为每例患者设计两种放疗方案。IMRT方案：设计10个野照射；VMAT方案：双侧胸壁同时进行两个Arc双弧照射。根据DVH图得出PTV的Dmean、V95%、V107%、V110%，靶区适形度指数（CI）、均匀性指数（HI）及正常组织（肺和心脏）受量体积差异来比较两种治疗技术。结果：两种治疗技术均能满足处方需求。靶区覆盖率都归至95%时，IMRT计划中PTV的Dmean优于VMAT计划中靶区的Dmean（P=0.04）。但是VMAT计划的V95%比IMRT提高了2.7 cm3（P=0.02），而V107%和V110%分别减少了2.93和0.05 cm3，变化具有统计学差异（P=0.03, 0.03）。而且，在计划HI和CI方面，VMAT计划比IMRT计划更好（P=0.03, 0.05）。危及器官肺的参数：相较于VMAT计划，除了V5高于IMRT计划以外，其余参数均低于IMRT计划；而心脏的参数VMAT除了V40以外其他的所有参数均高于IMRT计划，但是变化不具有统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论：相较于IMRT技术，VMAT计划靶区剂量分布更均匀，靶区和肺等受量优于IMRT计划，心脏的受量差于IMRT技术，但是仍在可接受范围内。因此，对于根治术后的双侧乳腺癌患者，使用VMAT双弧计划设计能获得较好的治疗收益。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of target areas and organs-at-risk between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for bilateral breast cancer in postmastectomy radiotherapy, and discuss the optimal treatment scheme. Methods A total of 8 patients receiving radical or modified radical mastectomy for bilateral primary breast cancer were enrolled in this study. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy system was used to design two radiotherapy plans, namely IMRT and VMAT, for each patient. There were 10 fixed fields in IMRT plan. In VMAT plan, the bilateral chest wall was treated with double-arc VMAT. The dosimetric parameters obtained by dose-volume histogram, including the mean dose, V95%, V107%, V110% , conformity index and homogeneity index of planning target volume (PTV), and the dosimetric parameters of normal tissues, such as lungs and heart, were compared between two plans. Results Both the two plans met the prescription requirements. When the target coverage reached 95%, the mean dose of PTV in IMRT plan was better than that in VMAT plan (P=0.04). Compared with those in IMRT plan, the V95% of PTV in VMAT plan was increased by 2.7 cm3 (P=0.02), while the V107% and V110% of PTV were decreased by 2.93 and 0.05 cm3, respectively (P=0.03, 0.03). Moreover, VMAT plan was superior to IMRT plan in the homogeneity index and conformity index (P=0.03, 0.05). The V5 of lungs in VMAT plan was higher than that in IMRT plan, while the other parameters of lungs in VMAT plan were lower than those in IMRT plan. Except the V40 of heart, the dosimetric parameters of heart in VMAT plan were higher than those of IMRT, without statistical differences (P>0.05). Conclusion VMAT plan is superior to IMRT plan in dose distribution and the dosimetric parameters of target areas and lungs. Although the dose of heart in VMAT plan is inferior to that in IMRT plan, the differences are still within acceptable range. Therefore, the patients receiving radical surgery for bilateral breast cancer can benefit more from double-arc VMAT.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
[11]张磊,李浦,杨一威,等. 双侧乳腺癌同步放疗设计中多射野中心及固定钨门技术的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(4):373.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.001]
　ZHANG Lei,LI Pu,YANG Yiwei,et al. Application of double-isocenter and fixed-jaw technology in radiotherapy for bilateral breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(4):373.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.04.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-12-19
【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（81472809，81502653，81672983，81703028）
【作者简介】史玉静，硕士研究生，主要从事肿瘤放射治疗学相关研究，E-mail: 1208519910@qq.com
【通信作者】郑海伦，主要从事肿瘤放疗技术相关研究，E-mail: zhenghailun13@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-22