[1]眭建锋,孙佳伟,谢凯,等.基于标定和计算的电子射野影像系统剂量重建[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2024,41(1):54-59.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.01.008]
　SUI Jianfeng,,et al.Dose reconstruction of electronic portal imaging device based on calibration and calculation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2024,41(1):54-59.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.01.008]
点击复制

基于标定和计算的电子射野影像系统剂量重建()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
41卷
期数:
2024年第1期
页码:
54-59
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2024-01-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dose reconstruction of electronic portal imaging device based on calibration and calculation
文章编号:
1005-202X（2024）01-0054-06
作者:
眭建锋1; 2; 3; 孙佳伟1; 2; 3; 谢凯1; 2; 3; 高留刚1; 2; 3; 林涛1; 2; 3; 倪昕晔1; 2; 3
1.南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院放疗科， 江苏 常州 213161； 2.南京医科大学医学物理研究中心， 江苏 常州 213161； 3.江苏省医学物理工程研究中心， 江苏 常州 213161
Author(s):
SUI Jianfeng1;  2;  3;  SUN Jiawei1;  2;  3;  XIE Kai1;  2;  3;  GAO Liugang1;  2;  3;  LIN Tao1;  2;  3;  NI Xinye1;  2;  3
1. Department of Radiotherapy, the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 Peoples Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213161, China 2. Center of Medical Physics, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213161, China 3. Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou 213161, China
关键词:
剂量标定; 剂量计算; 电子射野影像系统; 重建; 验证
Keywords:
Keywords: dose calibration dose calculation electrionic portal imaging device reconstruction verification
分类号:
R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.01.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
提出了一种基于标定和计算的电子射野影像系统（EPID）剂量重建算法。首先，对连续采集模式的EPID原始数据进行暗场校正和增益校正，然后通过亮场灰度特征确定射野边界。其次，对EPID数据进行MU标定、离轴标定和射野大小标定，并根据标定后的叠加通量和加速器机头蒙特卡罗模型进行剂量重建。最后，选取9例IMRT计划，分别使用EPID和MapCheck对计划进行验证测量，并在不同γ标准下比较两种验证工具的通过率。针对选取的1例计划病例，两种标准下使用MapCheck对多个病例验证的通过率分别为99.02%±1.28%、90.84%±4.49%；使用EPID重建模型的平均通过率分别为98.86%±1.19%、91.39%±4.80%。本文提出的标定和剂量计算相结合的EPID重建算法，与主流剂量验证软件MapCheck相比，对IMRT计划的验证通过率没有统计学差异（P>0.05），符合剂量验证的临床要求。
Abstract:
Abstract: A dose reconstruction algorithm for electrionic portal imaging device (EPID) based on calibration and calculation is developed. The raw data of EPID in continuous acquisition mode are corrected for dark field and gain, and the gray level features of bright field are used to determine the field boundary. Subsequently, MU calibration, off-axis calibration and field size calibration are performed on the EPID data, and dose reconstruction is carried out based on the calibrated superimposed flux and the Monte Carlo model of the linac head. Nine cases of IMRT plans are selected for verification and measurement using EPID and MapCheck separately, and the passing rates between the two tools are compared under different gamma criteria (3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm). For a planned case, the average passing rates of multiple cases verified by MapCheck under the two criteria were 99.02%±1.28% and 90.84%±4.49%, and the average passing rates of the EPID reconstruction models were 98.86%±1.19% and 91.39%±4.80%. Compared with MapCheck, the EPID reconstruction algorithm based on calibration and calculation has no significant difference in the passing rate of IMRT plan verification (P>0.05), which meets the clinical requirements of dose verification.

相似文献/References:

[1]章骏,曹瑞芬,陈朝斌,等.蒙特卡罗程序DPM的并行化及其在精确放射治疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5101.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.001]
[2]周永强,金献测,邓祯祥,等.基于锥形束CT图像剂量计算的可行性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):550.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.021]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(1):550.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.021]
[3]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[4]徐艳红,张晋建,黎静,等.影像增强剂对脑瘤螺旋断层放疗剂量计算的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(8):757.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.08.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(1):757.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.08.001]
[5]吴宜灿,贾婧,曹瑞芬,等. 质子调强放射治疗计划系统KylinRay-IMPT[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):541.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(1):541.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.001]
[6]巩汉顺,徐寿平,刘博,等.食管癌患者CBCT图像剂量计算准确性的分析评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(5):497.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.05.001]
　GONG Hanshun,XU Shouping,LIU Bo,et al. Accuracy of dose calculation with CBCT images in patients with esophageal cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):497.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.05.001]
[7]赵培峰,孙彦泽,周钢. 带金属植入物患者调强放射治疗计划中射野角度设置对剂量计算准确度的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):882.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.004]
　ZHAO Peifeng,SUN Yanze,ZHOU Gang. Effect of field angle setting on dose calculation accuracy in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for patients with metal implants[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):882.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.004]
[8]毛凯娜,张鹏程,桂志国.一种基于笔形束核的快速剂量计算方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(12):1383.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.004]
　MAO Kaina,ZHANG Pengcheng,et al.Pencil beam kernel-based method for fast dose calculation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(1):1383.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.004]
[9]朱凤盈,马彦凝,罗锦胜,等.CT-电子密度转换曲线误差对IMRT剂量计算结果的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(7):816.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.07.004]
　ZHU Fengying,MA Yanning,LUO Jinsheng,et al.Effect of the error of CT-electron density conversion curve on IMRT dose calculation[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(1):816.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.07.004]
[10]景生华,李傲梅,季小芹,等.金标伪影对射波刀剂量计算及分布的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(8):996.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.011]
　JING Sheng-hua,LI Ao-mei,JI Xiao-qin,et al.Effects of fiducial artifact on dose calculation and distribution of Cyberknife treatment[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(1):996.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.08.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-08-20 【基金项目】国家自然科学基金（62371243）；江苏省重点研发计划社会发展项目（BE2022720）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20231190）；江苏省卫健委面上项目（M2020006）；常州市社会发展项目（CE20235063）；常州市科技计划（CJ20220136, CJ20210128）；江苏省医学重点学科建设单位（SDW202237） 【作者简介】眭建锋，硕士研究生，放疗物理师，E-mail: shuzicaiji@163.com 【通信作者】倪昕晔，博士，研究员，E-mail: nxy@njmu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-23