[1]严慧,包亚红,盛国华,等.冠状动脉容积再现成像中人工重建与人工智能重建的比较研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2024,41(5):657-660.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.05.018]
　YAN Hui,BAO Yahong,SHENG Guohua,et al.Comparison of artificial reconstruction and reconstruction using artificial intelligence in coronary artery volume rendering[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2024,41(5):657-660.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.05.018]
点击复制

冠状动脉容积再现成像中人工重建与人工智能重建的比较研究()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
41卷
期数:
2024年第5期
页码:
657-660
栏目:
医学人工智能
出版日期:
2024-05-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of artificial reconstruction and reconstruction using artificial intelligence in coronary artery volume rendering
文章编号:
1005-202X（2024）05-0657-04
作者:
严慧1; 包亚红2; 盛国华1; 黄凯荣1; 李勇1; 耿海华3
1.南通市海门区人民医院心内科， 江苏 南通 226100； 2.南通市海门区人民医院CT室， 江苏 南通 226100； 3.南通大学附属医院心内科， 江苏 南通 226001
Author(s):
YAN Hui1;  BAO Yahong2;  SHENG Guohua1;  HUANG Kairong1;  LI Yong1;  GENG Haihua3
1. Department of Cardiology, Nantong Haimen Peoples Hospital, Nantong 226100, China 2. CT Room, Nantong Haimen Peoples Hospital, Nantong 226100, China 3. Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
关键词:
冠状动脉容积; 再现成像; 人工重建; 人工智能重建
Keywords:
Keywords: coronary artery volume rendering artificial reconstruction artificial intelligence reconstruction
分类号:
R318；R816.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2024.05.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：对冠状动脉容积再现成像中人工重建与人工智能重建进行比较研究。方法：选取110例冠心病（CHD）患者作为研究对象，全部患者均行CT造影检查，并在冠状动脉容积再现成像中分别采取人工重建（人工组）和人工智能重建（智能组）。比较两组的容积再现（VR）、曲面重组（CPR）图像质量、动脉血管狭窄诊断符合率、血管重建评分。结果：人工组的VR图像质量评估优秀率为80.00%，智能组的VR质量评估优秀率为90.91%，智能组VR图像质量显著优于人工组；智能组CPR图像质量评分显著高于人工组（P<0.05）；两组动脉血管（RCA、LAD、LCX）无狭窄、轻微狭窄、中度狭窄和血管闭塞的诊断符合率比较，差异不显著（P>0.05）；轻度狭窄和重度狭窄等诊断符合率比较，差异显著（P<0.05）。与人工组相比，智能组的总评分平均值、3大主支+后降支+中间支+对角支+钝缘支中位数值、其余血管分支中位数值均显著升高（P<0.05）。结论：与人工重建相比，人工智能重建在冠状动脉容积再现成像中具有更高应用价值。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To explore artificial reconstruction vs artificial intelligence reconstruction in coronary artery volume rendering (VR). Methods A total of 110 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients were enrolled in the study, and underwent computed tomography arteriography. Artificial reconstruction (artificial group) and artificial intelligence reconstruction (intelligent group) were conducted in coronary artery VR. The image quality of VR and curved planar reconstruction (CPR), the diagnosis coincidence rate of arterial stenosis, and vascular reconstruction score were compared between two groups. Results The VR image quality of intelligent group was significantly higher than that of artificial group, with excellence rate of 90.91% vs 80.00% and intelligent group scored higher than artificial group in CPR image quality (P<0.05). The differences in the diagnostic coincidence rates of arterial vessels (RCA, LAD, LCX) with no stenosis, slight stenosis, moderate stenosis, and vascular occlusion between two groups were trivial (P>0.05), while the two groups differed significantly in the diagnosis coincidence rates of mild stenosis and severe stenosis (P<0.05). The mean total score, the median value of the 3 main branches + posterior descending branch + intermediate branch + diagonal branch + blunt margin branch, and the median value of the other vascular branches were all significantly increased in intelligent group as compared with artificial group (P<0.05). Conclusion Artificial intelligence reconstruction has higher application value than artificial reconstruction in coronary artery VR.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-10-15 【基金项目】江苏省自然科学基金（BK20140249） 【作者简介】严慧，在职硕士，主治医师，研究方向：高血压、冠心病，E-mail: yan430625@sina.com? 【通信作者】耿海华，博士，主任医师，研究方向：心血管疾病的临床诊治，E-mail: huahua121829@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-24