[1]余枭,闫冰,刘磊,等.基于改进非共面容积旋转调强海马保护全脑放疗的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(5):529-533.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.05.001]
 YU Xiao,YAN Bing,LIU Lei,et al.Dosimetric study on improved non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(5):529-533.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.05.001]
点击复制

基于改进非共面容积旋转调强海马保护全脑放疗的剂量学研究(/HTML)
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第5期
页码:
529-533
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dosimetric study on improved non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy
文章编号:
1005-202X(2021)05-0529-05
作者:
余枭闫冰刘磊李骁扬沈建军吴爱东
Author(s):
YU Xiao YAN Bing LIU Lei LI Xiaoyang SHEN Jianjun WU Aidong
Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China
关键词:
中国科学技术大学附属第一医院放疗科 安徽 合肥 230001
Keywords:
hippocampus whole-brain radiotherapy volumetric modulated arc therapy non-coplanar coplanar
分类号:
R811.1;R815.6
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.05.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:对已有的非共面容积旋转调强(VMAT)海马保护全脑放疗(HA-WBRT)方法进行改进,比较改进的非共面VMAT计划与非共面、共面VMAT计划在HA-WBRT中的剂量学差异。方法:选取15例颅外肿瘤脑转移需行WBRT的患者,分别对每例患者设计改进非共面、非共面和共面VMAT计划,并对3种计划的靶区、危及器官剂量以及加速器MU值和治疗时间进行比较。结果:改进非共面VMAT计划与非共面、共面VMAT计划相比,改进非共面VMAT计划靶区适形性和剂量梯度的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但靶区剂量均匀性略差于另外两种计划。在海马体组织Dmax、Dmin、Dmean 3项剂量参数上,改进非共面计划可分别控制在约14.37、8.40和10.80 Gy,显著小于非共面和共面计划相应值(P<0.05);其它危及器官如晶体、视神经等剂量均控制在临床安全剂量范围内,各计划之间差异不显著;改进非共面计划MU值和治疗时间均大于非共面计划和共面计划,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相较于非共面和共面VMAT计划,本研究改进的非共面VMAT方法在HA-WBRT中能更进一步降低海马组织的受照剂量,为临床实施HA-WBRT时提供一种切实可行的治疗方案。
Abstract:
Objective To improve the non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT), and to compare dosimetric differences among improved non-coplanar VMAT, non-coplanar VMAT and coplanar VMAT for HA-WBRT. Methods Fifteen patients scheduled for WBRT for brain metastasis from extracranial tumors were enrolled in the study, and 3 different kinds of plans, namely improved non-coplanar VMAT, non-coplanar VMAT and coplanar VMAT plans, were designed for each patient. The doses delivered to target areas and organs-at-risk, monitor unit and treatment time were compared among 3 different kinds of plans. Results There were no statistical differences among 3 different kinds of plans in conformity index and gradient index (P>0.05), but improved non-coplanar VMAT plan had a higher homogeneity index than the other two kinds of plans. The Dmax, Dmin and Dmean of hippocampus in improved non-coplanar VMAT plans could be limited to 14.37, 8.40 and 10.80 Gy, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in non-coplanar VMAT plans and coplanar plans (P<0.05). The doses delivered to other organs-at-risk, such as lens and optic nerves, were within the range of clinical safe dose, and no statistical significance was found among different plans. The monitor unit and treatment time of improved non-coplanar VMAT plans were both greater than those of non-coplanar VMAT plans and coplanar VMAT plans, with statistical differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with non-coplanar VMAT and coplanar VMAT, improved non-coplanar VMAT for HA-WBRT can further reduce the dose delivered to hippocampus, providing a practicable treatment strategy for the clinical application of HA-WBRT.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2021-01-29 【基金项目】国家自然科学基金青年基金(11805198);安徽省学术和技术带头人后备人选科研项目(2020H230) 【作者简介】余枭,硕士,主要研究方向:肿瘤放射物理学,E-mail: yuxiao940129@163.com 【通信作者】吴爱东,博士,正高级工程师,研究方向:放射物理,E-mail: flkaidongwu@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-31