[1]张国前,张书旭,曾庆星,等.不同配准方式下鼻咽癌千伏级CBCT图像引导放疗的摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(3):282-288.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.005]
　ZHANG Guoqian,ZHANG Shuxu,ZENG Qingxing,et al.Setup errors of kilo-voltage CBCT image-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different registration conditions[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(3):282-288.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.005]
点击复制

不同配准方式下鼻咽癌千伏级CBCT图像引导放疗的摆位误差()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第3期
页码:
282-288
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Setup errors of kilo-voltage CBCT image-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different registration conditions
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）03-0282-07
作者:
张国前; 张书旭; 曾庆星; 罗松桂; 李萍; 阳露; 王琳婧; 周露; 王锐濠; 廖煜良
广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科， 广东 广州 510095
Author(s):
ZHANG Guoqian;  ZHANG Shuxu;  ZENG Qingxing;  LUO Songgui;  LI Ping;  YANG Lu; WANG Linjing;  ZHOU Lu;  WANG Ruihao;  LIAO Yuliang
Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
关键词:
鼻咽癌; 千伏级锥形束CT; 骨性配准; 灰度配准; 摆位误差
Keywords:
Keywords: nasopharyngeal carcinoma;  kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography;  bone registration;  grey registration;  setup error
分类号:
R811.1；R730.55
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较鼻咽癌千伏级锥形束CT（CBCT）不同配准方式得出的配准结果，为摆位修正提供参考。方法：回顾性分析2018年5月~2019年8月在广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院进行治疗的100例鼻咽癌患者的CBCT图像。按照大区域（Large）即全扫描范围、小区域（Small）即计划靶区范围、骨性（Bone）、灰度（Grey）的不同组合方式，对千伏级CBCT图像分别采用大区域骨性（LB）、大区域灰度（LG）、小区域骨性（SB）、小区域灰度（SG）这4种方式进行配准，并对平移误差和旋转误差结果进行分析。结果：4种方式等中心点平移误差均值范围为-0.29~1.07 mm，旋转误差均值范围为-0.10°~0.61°。除LB与SB在Y方向的平移误差存在显著性差异（P=0.00）之外，其余平移和旋转误差均无显著性差异（P=0.05~0.82）。LG与SG的所有平移和旋转误差均无显著性差异（P=0.14~0.64）。而LG与LB相比除Y方向的平移和旋转误差无显著性差异（P=0.67, 0.57）外，其余所有误差均有显著性差异（P=0.00~0.02）。SB与SG相比除X方向平移误差和Y方向旋转误差无显著性差异（P=0.36, 0.72）外，其余所有误差均有显著性差异（0.00~0.02）。Pearson相关性分析表明三维方向上所有平移和旋转摆位误差结果均呈正相关（R=0.48~0.98, P<0.01）。采用LG和SG进行配准得出的摆位误差在X、Y、Z平移和旋转方向上的95％一致性限度分别为［1.19, -1.25］、［0.95, -1.01］、［1.13, -1.31］和［0.80, -0.85］、［0.69, -0.60］、［1.02, -1.13］。按照2 mm和2°界值标准二者摆位误差具有一致性。结论：在鼻咽癌的图像引导放疗中用千伏级CBCT进行自动模式下的图像配准时，三维方向上的配准结果可能因骨性或灰度配准方式的不同而有差别。配准区域选择靶区或全扫描范围时，配准结果差异不明显。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the results obtained by different registration methods in the kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) for providing a reference for setup correction. Methods The CBCT images of 100 NPC patients who were treated in the Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between May 2018 and August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Two registration areas, namely large area (the whole scanning area) and small area (planning target volume), and two registration algorithms, namely bone and grey registration algorithms, were adopted in the study. According to different combinations of the registration area and different registration algorithms, 4 registration methods, namely large area and bone registration (LB), large area and grey registration (LG), small area and bone registration (SB), and small area and grey registration (SG), were used for kilo-voltage CBCT image registration. The translation errors and rotation errors were analyzed. Results The average translation error range of the isocenter after the registration with 4 different methods was -0.29~1.07 mm, and the average rotation error ranged from -0.1° to 0.61°. No significant differences were found between LB and SB in the translation and rotation errors (P=0.05-0.82), except for the translation error in Y direction (P=0.00); and there was no statistical difference between LG and SG in all translation and rotation errors (P=0.14-0.64). Moreover, significant differences were found between LG and LB in the translation and rotation errors (P=0.00-0.02), except for the translation and rotation errors in Y direction (P=0.67, 0.57); and the comparison between SB and SG showed that there were significant differences in translation and rotation errors (P=0.00-0.02), except for the translation errors in X direction and the rotation error Y direction (P=0.36, 0.72). The result of Pearson correlation analysis revealed that there were positive correlations between any two registration methods in translation and rotation errors in X, Y and Z directions (R=0.48-0.98, P<0.01). With the registration of LG and SG, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of translation errors in X, Y and Z directions was ［1.19, -1.25］, ［0.95, -1.01］, ［1.13, -1.31］, and that of the rotation errors was ［0.80, -0.85］, ［0.69, -0.60］, ［1.02, -1.13］. The setup error was consistent, according to the 2 mm and 2° boundary standards. Conclusion When kilo-voltage CBCT is used for automatic image registration in image-guided radiotherapy for NPC, the registration results in three-dimensional directions may be different due to different registration modes (bone or grey registration); and with the full scanning area or planning target volume as registration area, the registration results are similar.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈广涛,汪 淇,刘亚强,等.TrueBeam加速器射野准直器跟随功能在鼻咽癌固定野调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4865.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.005]
[2]潘宇辉,陈榕钦,柏朋刚,等.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗前后腮腺体积及空间几何位置变化研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.005]
[3]张俊俊,邱小平,李奇欣,等.ArcCheck系统在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.009]
[4]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[5]黄利生,庄婷婷,伍方财,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗Ib区剂量分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5265.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.010]
[6]易金玲,金献测,周永强,等.鼻咽癌IMRT与VMAT治疗的计划与剂量验证比较研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3859.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.006]
[7]金献测,易金玲,周永强,等.鼻咽癌同步加量调强放射治疗新的计划质量评估指标研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3978.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.004]
[8]蒋晓芹,段宝风,艾平,等.基于图谱库的自动轮廓勾画软件(ABAS)在鼻咽癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3997.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.008]
[9]张达光,蒋胜鹏,李智华,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗中解剖结构改变及剂量分布变化的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.006]
[10]杨海燕,王军良,周振山,等.AAA算法和PBC算法在鼻咽癌调强放疗中剂量分布的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4245.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-10-11 【基金项目】广州市卫生和计划生育科技项目（20181A011098） 【作者简介】张国前，硕士，主管技师，研究方向：图像引导精确放疗，E-mail: zgqcc@126.com 【通信作者】张书旭，博士，教授，主任技师，博士生导师，主要从事肿瘤放射物理学和医学图像应用研究，E-mail: gthzsx@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-02