[1]宋洪兵,潘景辉,杨雄,等.Elekta Infinity直线加速器治疗床对放疗剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(2):157-161.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.006]
　SONG Hongbing,PAN Jinghui,YANG Xiong,et al.Effects of the carbon fiber couch of Elekta Infinity linear accelerator on radiotherapy dose[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2021,38(2):157-161.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.006]
点击复制

Elekta Infinity直线加速器治疗床对放疗剂量的影响()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2021年第2期
页码:
157-161
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2021-02-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of the carbon fiber couch of Elekta Infinity linear accelerator on radiotherapy dose
文章编号:
1005-202X（2021）02-0157-05
作者:
宋洪兵; 潘景辉; 杨雄; 阮长利; 李祥攀
武汉大学人民医院放疗科， 湖北 武汉 430060
Author(s):
SONG Hongbing;  PAN Jinghui;  YANG Xiong;  RUAN Changli;  LI Xiangpan
Department of Radiotherapy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
关键词:
直线加速器; 碳纤维治疗床; 衰减因子; 放疗剂量
Keywords:
Keywords: linear accelerator carbon fiber treatment couch attenuation factor radiotherapy dose
分类号:
R815.6；TH774
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2021.02.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：研究Elekta Infinity直线加速器治疗床在常用X射线能量下对放疗剂量的影响。方法：将圆柱体模体分别置于碳纤维主治疗床、延长板以及治疗床与延长板衔接处正中，旋转机架，分别让6和10 MV高能X射线穿过治疗床，利用指形电离室测量固体水中间的绝对剂量，得出不同角度下的剂量分布，并计算治疗床对X射线的衰减因子。结果：治疗床与延长板衔接处在120°和240°两个机架角处的剂量衰减因子在6和10 MV两种治疗模式下分别达到了36.02%和36.01%以及30.46%和30.63%，而当机架角为140°~220°时，衔接处与主治疗床的剂量衰减因子相近，在6与10 MV能量下的剂量衰减因子平均值及标准差分别为2.56%±0.49%和2.14%±0.39%以及2.55%±0.48%和1.95%±0.41%，机架角由180°增大或减小时两处的剂量衰减均呈上升趋势，二者均在120°和240°附近达到最大；6和10 MV两种能量下延长板在该角度区间的剂量衰减因子平均值及标准差分别为1.55%±0.24%和1.07%±0.25%，并在115°和245°附近达到最大值，剂量衰减因子分别为4.08%和3.97%以及3.20%和3.34%。结论：后斜野主体部分在主治疗床与衔接处对剂量的衰减低于3%，在延长板处对剂量的衰减小于2%，但在120°和240°附近以及115°和245°附近3处位置的剂量衰减会达到最大，需在计划系统中考虑床的影响；此外，主治疗床与延长板衔接处在120°和240°附近对剂量的衰减急剧增大，不适合作为治疗区域，在治疗病人时需注意避免将靶区移到该区域。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of the carbon fiber treatment couch of Elekta Infinity linear accelerator on radiotherapy dose. Methods Polymethyl methacrylate cylinder phantoms were put on the centers of main treatment couch, extension board and the joint area of them, separately. The gantry was rotated at different angles to beam 6 MV and 10 MV X-rays to penetrate the carbon-fiber couch, and a thimble chamber was utilized to measure the absolute dose in the cylinder phantom. The dose distribution at each angle was recorded and the X-ray attenuation factor of the treatment couch was calculated. Results At the gantry angles of 120°and 240°, the attenuation factors at the treatment couch reached 36.02% and 36.01% under 6 MV, and those at the joint area were 30.46% and 30.63% under 10 MV. The attenuation factors at the joint area and main treatment couch were close during the gantry angle between 140° and 220°, and the average value and standard deviation of their attenuation factors were 2.56%±0.49% and 2.14%±0.39% under 6 MV, and 2.55%±0.48% and 1.95%±0.41% under 10 MV. The attenuation factors at the joint area and main treatment couch were both increased when the gantry angle was increased or decreased from 180°, and reached the maximum around the gantry angles of 120°and 240°. The average value and standard deviation of the attenuation factors at extension board under 6 MV and 10 MV in the same angular intervals were 1.55%±0.24% and 1.07%±0.25%, respectively, and the largest attenuation factors were found at the gantry angles of 115° and 245°, with 4.08% and 3.97% under 6 MV, and 3.20% and 3.34% under 10 MV. Conclusion For the main part of posterior oblique field, the X-ray attenuation factors were below 3% at main treatment couch and the joint area, while it was below 2% at extension board. However, the attenuation effect reached the maximum at the gantry angles of 120° and 240°, 115° and 245°, which make the carbon fiber couch must be considered in treatment plan system. Moreover, the joint area is not suitable for clinical treatment for it dramatically affects the delivered dose at the gantry angles of 120° and 240°, and the target area should not appeared in this area.

相似文献/References:

[1]李军,张西志,花威,等.VARIAN直线加速器IGRT全碳纤维治疗床与虚拟治疗床对高能X射线剂量的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(04):479.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.006]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(2):479.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.04.006]
[2]岳海振,张艺宝,刘卓伦,等. 直线加速器均整和非均整模式下射线质和射野输出因子的蒙特卡罗模拟与实测值比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):548.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(2):548.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.002]
[3]周鹏,胡南,刘岩海,等.医用直线加速器无均整器下6 MV X线能谱特性的蒙特卡罗研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(8):761.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.08.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(2):761.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.08.002]
[4]喻伟,徐胜,马宏宾,等. 基于IAEA398号报告进行直线加速器输出量校准的实践与探索[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(3):235.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(2):235.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.03.004]
[5]董晓庆,林清,胡杰,等. 病人皮肤剂量监测仪在放射治疗的临床应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(4):363.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.04.009]
[6]门阔,戴建荣,陈辛元,等. 双能锥形束CT线性混合技术提高相对电子密度的准确性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(5):433.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.05.001]
[7]夏祥１,李永宝,吴朝霞,等. Varian RapidARC直线加速器6 MeV-X线虚拟源模型的建立[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):561.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(2):561.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.005]
[8]闫冰,吴爱东. 非晶硅电子射野影像装置在直线加速器日检中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(10):988.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(2):988.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.004]
[9]李建锋,黄顺平. 实验细胞直线加速器照射方法与剂量学探讨[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(12):1211.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.12.005]
　LI Jianfeng,HUANG Shunping. Irradiation method of experimental cell on linear accelerator and dosimetry study[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(2):1211.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.12.005]
[10]唐志全,蒋泽,彭旭东,等. 医科达加速器的剂量监测与控制系统[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(1):9.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.003]
　TANG Zhiquan,JIANG Ze,PENG Xudong,et al. Dose monitoring and control system of Elekta linear accelerator[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(2):9.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.01.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-09-05 【基金项目】湖北省自然科学基金(2014CFB394，2019CFB721)；湖北省卫计委基金(WJ2017M027) 【作者简介】宋洪兵，主管技师，工学博士，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: mr.song1989@foxmail.com 【通信作者】李祥攀，副主任医师，医学博士，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗，E-mail: lxp008cn@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-02