[1]张全彬,彭莹莹,余辉,等.基于Auto-planning技术的早期鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗计划评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(4):426-430.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.04.006]
 ZHANG Quanbin,PENG Yingying,YU Hui,et al.Evaluation of Auto-planning technique-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(4):426-430.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.04.006]
点击复制

基于Auto-planning技术的早期鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗计划评估()
分享到:

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第4期
页码:
426-430
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-04-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of Auto-planning technique-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma
文章编号:
1005-202X(2020)04-0426-05
作者:
张全彬彭莹莹余辉张书旭
广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院放疗中心, 广东 广州 510095
Author(s):
ZHANG Quanbin PENG Yingying YU Hui ZHANG Shuxu
Radiotherapy Center, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
关键词:
鼻咽癌Auto-planning容积旋转调强放射治疗剂量学
Keywords:
Keywords: nasopharyngeal carcinoma Auto-planning volumetric modulated arc therapy dosimetry
分类号:
R811.1;R739.63
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.04.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较基于Auto-planning技术的早期鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗(VMAT)计划和常规VMAT计划之间的剂量学差异以及计划质量。方法:回顾性分析20例早期鼻咽癌患者的临床资料,采用Pinnacle3计划系统的Auto-planning自动计划模块行VMAT自动计划设计,相应的常规VMAT计划由经验丰富的物理师完成设计,分别为aVMAT和mVMAT。对两组计划的肿瘤靶区剂量分布、危及器官剂量学、机器跳数和计划设计时间进行比较和评估。结果:两组计划靶区的剂量覆盖和适形度均满足处方要求。aVMAT组的PGTV、PTV2的剂量均匀性指数明显优于mVMAT组,但两者的适形度指数无显著差异性。此外,aVMAT计划比mVMAT计划可以更好地保护脊髓,而且在降低脑干的受照剂量亦具有优势。与mVMAT组相比,aVMAT组的平均机器跳数MU减少6.83%,平均计划设计时间减少14.50%。结论:对于早期鼻咽癌,基于Auto-planning技术所产生的自动VMAT计划,比常规VMAT计划具有更佳的靶区剂量分布,且更好地降低正常组织的剂量,同时具有更高的优化效率和计划执行效率。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric differences and planning qualities between conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (mVMAT) plan and Auto-planning technique-based VMAT plan (aVMAT) for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods The clinical data of 20 patients with early NPC were analyzed retrospectively. Two kinds of VMAT plans, namely mVMAT plan and aVMAT plan, were designed for each patient. mVMAT plans were manually generated by experienced physicists, and aVMAT plans were automatically generated by Auto-Planning module in Pinnacle3 system. The dose distributions, organs-at-risk sparing, monitor units and planning time were evaluated and compared. Results The dose coverage and conformity index of the target areas in two groups met the prescription requirements. The homogeneity indexes of PGTV and PTV2 in aVMAT group were significantly better than those in mVMAT group, but there was no significant difference in conformity index between two groups. aVMAT plan was advantages over mVMAT plan in protecting spine cord and reducing the dose to the brain stem. Compared with those in mVMAT group, the average monitor units in aVMAT group was reduced by 6.83%, and the average planning time was reduced by 14.50%. Conclusion Compared with mVMAT plan, aVMAT plan for early NPC has better target dose distribution and reduces the dose to normal tissues. Additionally, aVMAT plan has higher optimization efficiency and plan execution efficiency.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈广涛,汪 淇,刘亚强,等.TrueBeam加速器射野准直器跟随功能在鼻咽癌固定野调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4865.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.005]
[2]潘宇辉,陈榕钦,柏朋刚,等.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗前后腮腺体积及空间几何位置变化研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.005]
[3]张俊俊,邱小平,李奇欣,等.ArcCheck系统在鼻咽癌容积旋转调强剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5136.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.009]
[4]桑 勇,陈维军,狄小云,等.多叶光栅叶片宽度对鼻咽癌剂量学的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5240.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.004]
[5]黄利生,庄婷婷,伍方财,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗Ib区剂量分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5265.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.010]
[6]易金玲,金献测,周永强,等.鼻咽癌IMRT与VMAT治疗的计划与剂量验证比较研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(01):3859.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.01.006]
[7]金献测,易金玲,周永强,等.鼻咽癌同步加量调强放射治疗新的计划质量评估指标研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3978.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.004]
[8]蒋晓芹,段宝风,艾平,等.基于图谱库的自动轮廓勾画软件(ABAS)在鼻咽癌调强放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3997.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.008]
[9]张达光,蒋胜鹏,李智华,等.鼻咽癌调强放疗中解剖结构改变及剂量分布变化的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4239.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.006]
[10]杨海燕,王军良,周振山,等.AAA算法和PBC算法在鼻咽癌调强放疗中剂量分布的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(04):4245.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.04.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-12-03 【基金项目】广州市医药卫生科技一般引导项目(20181A011095) 【作者简介】张全彬,研究生,主要研究方向:放射物理及放射肿瘤,E-mail: zxiansheng316@21cn.com 【通信作者】张书旭,教授,主要研究方向:放射物理及放射肿瘤,E-mail: gthzsx@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-29