[1]曾嵘,陈鹏,王杰,等.脑转移瘤同期加量混合调强放疗与调强放疗的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(6):671-675.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.003]
　ZENG Rong,CHEN Peng,WANG Jie,et al.Dosimetric comparison of Hybrid-IMRT vs IMRT for radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(6):671-675.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.003]
点击复制

脑转移瘤同期加量混合调强放疗与调强放疗的剂量学比较()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第6期
页码:
671-675
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dosimetric comparison of Hybrid-IMRT vs IMRT for radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）06-0671-05
作者:
曾嵘; 陈鹏; 王杰; 姜琦; 王尚虎; 闵旭红
安徽省胸科医院肿瘤放疗科， 安徽 合肥 230022
Author(s):
ZENG Rong;  CHEN Peng;  WANG Jie;  JIANG Qi;  WANG Shanghu;  MIN Xuhong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei 230022, China
关键词:
脑转移瘤; 混合调强放疗; 调强放疗; 同期加量; 剂量学
Keywords:
Keywords: brain metastasis hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy intensity-modulated radiotherapy simultaneous integrated boost dosimetry
分类号:
R739.41；R811.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：探讨同时运用三维适形与调强的混合调强放疗（Hybrid-IMRT）与调强放疗（IMRT）用于脑转移瘤同期加量的剂量学差异。方法：选取20例进行头颅放疗的患者，分别设计Hybrid-IMRT计划和IMRT计划。Hybrid-IMRT计划包括全脑行三维适形（两野对穿）3 600 cGy/20 F、脑转移灶行IMRT同期加量至5 000 cGy/20 F；IMRT计划全程运用IMRT给予全脑照射3 600 cGy/20 F、脑转移灶5 000 cGy/20 F。在满足临床要求的前提下，比较两组计划靶区的均匀性指数、适形度指数、平均剂量和机器跳数，危及器官脑干、视神经、晶体、视交叉、眼球的最大剂量和平均剂量。结果：两种计划均能满足临床要求。Hybrid-IMRT计划的PGTV均匀性优于IMRT计划（P<0.001）；Hybrid-IMRT计划的脑干、视交叉、左右晶体的最大剂量与平均剂量，左右眼球的平均剂量以及左右视神经的最大剂量均低于IMRT计划（P<0.05）；Hybrid-IMRT计划的机器跳数比IMRT计划减少了约70%（P<0.001）。结论：两种计划均能满足临床要求，Hybrid-IMRT计划相较IMRT计划靶区剂量更加均匀，治疗时间缩短，也能更好地保护危及器官。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To explore the dosimetric differences between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and Hybrid-IMRT which combining three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT for radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases. Methods Hybrid-IMRT plan and IMRT plan were designed for 20 patients with brain metastases. Hybrid-IMRT plan included 3 600 cGy/20 F to the whole brain by 2 horizontal irradiation fields in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and 5 000 cGy/20 F to brain metastases by IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost. In IMRT plan, 3 600 cGy/20 F was given to the whole brain and 5 000 cGy/20 F to brain metastases. On the premise of meeting the clinical requirements, the dosimetric parameters between Hybrid-IMRT and IMRT were compared. The dosimetric parameters included the conformity index (CI), homogeneity index and mean dose of target areas, monitor units, the maximum dose and mean dose of organs-at-risk such as brain stem, optic nerves, lens, optic chiasm and eyeballs. Results Both IMRT plan and Hybrid-IMRT plan met the clinical requirements. The homogeneity index of PGTV in Hybrid-IMRT plan was lower than IMRT plan (P<0.001). The maximum dose and mean dose of brain stem, optic chiasm and lens, and the mean dose of eyeballs and the maximum dose of optic nerves in Hybrid-IMRT plan were lower than those in IMRT plan (P<0.05). Moreover, the monitor units in Hybrid-IMRT plan was decreased by about 70% as compared with IMRT plan (P<0.001). Conclusion Both plans meet the clinical requirements, but Hybrid-IMRT plan is advantageous over IMRT plan in homogeneity index, treatment time and organs-at-risk sparing.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘建庭,王晋丽,郭瑞嵩,等.简化调强技术在脑转移瘤外照射中应用的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.005]
[2]宁丽华,赵桂芝,张磊,等.全脑放疗伴随1~4 个脑转移瘤同期加量不同调强技术的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(2):128.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.02.005]
[3]段小娟,周一兵,钱金栋.脑转移瘤调强放疗最佳子野数目[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(7):668.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):668.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.07.005]
[4]张平,戴鹏,罗龙辉,等. 准直器角度对颅内两个脑转移瘤容积旋转调强计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(12):1399.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006]
　ZHANG Ping,DAI Peng,LUO Longhui,et al. Effects of collimator angle on volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for two brain metastases [J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(6):1399.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.12.006]
[5]邓官华,黄爱花,陈丽霞,等.准直器角度误差对脑转移瘤VMAT计划Gamma通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(12):1411.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.009]
　DENG Guanhua,HUANG Aihua,CHEN Lixia,et al.Effects of collimator angle error on Gamma passing rates for volumetric modulated arc therapy plan for intracranial metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(6):1411.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.12.009]
[6]葛瑞刚,解传滨,戴相昆,等.D2SRS两种照射技术与CyberKnife在脑转移瘤立体定向放疗中的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(3):265.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.001]
　GE Ruigang,XIE Chuanbin,DAI Xiangkun,et al.Dosimetric comparison of two kinds of radiation techniques of D2SRS and CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(6):265.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.03.001]
[7]黎嘉敏,区杰浩,李晓丹,等.对比增强磁敏感加权成像序列与肺癌脑转移瘤检出的相关性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(5):556.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.05.006]
　LI Jiamin,OU Jiehao,et al.Correlation between contrast-enhanced SWI sequence and detection of brain metastases from lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(6):556.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.05.006]
[8]魏夏平,苏洁洪,林楚婕,等.3种立体定向放射外科技术在不同脑转移瘤个数下的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(11):1329.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.11.002]
　WEI Xiaping,SU Jiehong,LIN Chujie,et al.Comparison among 3 different SRS techniques in the treatment of single or multiple brain metastases[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2022,39(6):1329.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2022.11.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2019-12-17 【基金项目】国家卫生计生委医药卫生科技发展项目（W2015XR28） 【作者简介】曾嵘，硕士，物理师，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗，E-mail: 963040239@qq.com 【通信作者】闵旭红，副主任医师，研究方向：肿瘤综合治疗，E-mail: 1320722827@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-03