[1]陆佳扬,黄宝添,李梅,等. 应用放射生物学模型比较早期鼻咽癌不同放疗剂量分割方案[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(6):626-631.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.002]
　LU Jiayang,HUANG Baotian,LI Mei,et al. Comparison of different fractionation regimens for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma using radiobiological model[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(6):626-631.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.002]
点击复制

 应用放射生物学模型比较早期鼻咽癌不同放疗剂量分割方案()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第6期
页码:
626-631
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of different fractionation regimens for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma using radiobiological model
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）06-0626-06
作者:
 陆佳扬; 黄宝添; 李梅; 张基永
 汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院放疗科， 广东 汕头 515000
Author(s):
 LU Jiayang;  HUANG Baotian;  LI Mei;  ZHANG Jiyong
 Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515000, China
关键词:
 ; 放射生物学模型; 鼻咽癌; 容积弧形调强放疗; 剂量学
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: radiobiological model;  nasopharyngeal carcinoma;  volumetric modulated arc therapy;  dosimetry
分类号:
R811.1；R730.55
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.06.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 【摘要】目的：通过放射生物学模型分析和剂量学比较为早期鼻咽癌放疗剂量分割方案的优化选择提供参考。方法：选取24个病例，采用3种剂量分割方案（总剂量均为70 Gy，分割数分别为30、33、35 Fr）分别制定3组容积弧形调强计划。采用考虑肿瘤克隆源性细胞再增殖与乏氧的Webb-Nahum模型预测肿瘤控制概率（TCP），使用Lyman-Kutcher-Burman模型预测危及器官正常组织并发症发生概率（NTCP）。然后结合TCP和NTCP计算无并发症肿瘤控制概率（UTCP）。比较并分析3种剂量分割方案的UTCP、TCP、NTCP值以及剂量学参数。结果：3种方案中，70 Gy/30 Fr方案的UTCP值（80.6%）最高，而70 Gy/35 Fr方案的UTCP值（78.0%）最低（P<0.05）。70 Gy/30 Fr方案能提高TCP值，最大幅度为7.3%（P<0.05），同时保持或略微增加了NTCP值，最大幅度仅为2.2%（P<0.05）。3种剂量分割方案的剂量学参数均无明显差异（P>0.05）。结论：通过放射生物学模型分析，早期鼻咽癌70 Gy/30 Fr方案的治疗增益比最大，能显著提高肿瘤局控率同时不显著增加正常组织毒性，本结论还需临床试验进一步确认。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To provide a theoretical reference for selecting a preferable fractionation regimen (FR) for radiotherapy of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparing radiobiological and dosimetric responses of tumor to different FR. Methods A total of 24 patients were enrolled in this study, and 3 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with different FR (70 Gy/30 Fr, 70 Gy/33 Fr and 70 Gy/35 Fr) were designed for each patient. Webb-Nahum radiobiological model considering the repopulation and hypoxia of tumor clonogenic cells was used to predict tumor control probability (TCP), and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model was utilized to estimate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for organs-at-risk. Subsequently, TCP was combined with NTCP to calculate uncomplicated TCP (UTCP). The UTCP, TCP, NTCP and dosimetric parameters of VMAT plans with different FR were compared and analyzed. Results Among 3 different VMAT plans, the VMAT plan with 70 Gy/30 Fr had the highest UTCP (80.6%), while the VMAT plan with 70 Gy/35 Fr had the lowest UTCP (78.0%) (P<0.05). The VMAT plan with 70 Gy/30 Fr increased TCP by up to 7.3%, and meanwhile maintained or slightly increased NTCP, only with a maximum increase of 2.2% (P<0.05). No significant dosimetric difference was found among 3 different FR. Conclusion Based on the radiobiological model analysis, the VMAT with 70 Gy/30 Fr for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma provides the maximal therapeutic gain and improves improving local control rate of tumor, without significantly increasing the toxicity of normal tissues. However, more clinical trials are needed to validate the conclusion.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-12-24
【基金项目】广东省医学科学技术研究基金（B2016048）；广东省科技创新战略专项资金（纵向协同管理方向）项目［汕府科（2018）157号］；国家自然科学基金青年基金（81602667）
【作者简介】陆佳扬，硕士，高级工程师，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗物理学，E-mail: lujame@yeah.net
【通信作者】张基永，硕士，高级工程师，研究方向：肿瘤放射治疗物理学，E-mail: jyzh502@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-25