[1]徐诗磊,张九堂,张俊俊,等.各向异性解析算法与先进外照射光子剂量算法在肺癌VMAT计划中的剂量学差异[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(6):676-679.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.004]
　XU Shilei,ZHANG Jiutang,ZHANG Junjun,et al.Dosimetric differences between Acuros external beam algorithm and anisotropy analysis algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2020,37(6):676-679.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.004]
点击复制

各向异性解析算法与先进外照射光子剂量算法在肺癌VMAT计划中的剂量学差异()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2020年第6期
页码:
676-679
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2020-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dosimetric differences between Acuros external beam algorithm and anisotropy analysis algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2020）06-0676-04
作者:
徐诗磊1; 张九堂1; 张俊俊2; 陈旎1
1.湖南省肿瘤医院放射物理技术部， 湖南 长沙 410013； 2.中南大学湘雅三医院放射治疗中心， 湖南 长沙 410013
Author(s):
XU Shilei1;  ZHANG Jiutang1;  ZHANG Junjun2;  CHEN Ni1
1. Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha 410013, China 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
关键词:
肺癌; AXB算法; AAA算法; 容积旋转调强放射治疗
Keywords:
Keywords: lung cancer Acuros external beam algorithm anisotropic analytical algorithm volumetric modulated arc therapy
分类号:
R811.1；R734.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较先进外照射光子剂量算法（AXB）和各向异性解析算法（AAA）在肺癌VMAT计划中的剂量学差异。方法：随机选取20例肺癌患者，CT扫描传输图像后勾画靶区及危及器官，采用两弧设计VMAT放疗计划，比较两种算法靶区的剂量分布，肺、心脏和脊髓的受照量。结果：PGTV：最大剂量AXB算法低于AAA算法（P<0.05），最小剂量无统计学意义（P>0.05），平均剂量AXB算法低于AAA算法（P<0.05）；PTV：最大剂量和最小剂量无统计学意义（P>0.05），平均剂量AXB算法低于AAA算法（P<0.05）；CI：AXB算法优于AAA算法（P<0.05）；HI：AXB算法优于AAA算法（P<0.05）；脊髓：最大剂量AXB算法低于AAA算法（P<0.05）；心脏：V30、V40、Dmean AXB算法均低于AAA算法（P<0.05）；肺：V5、V20、Dmean AXB算法均低于AAA算法（P<0.05）。结论：两种算法均满足临床要求，但与AAA算法相比，AXB算法更精确，特别是针对肺组织这种低密度区域。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the dosimetric differences in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using Acuros external beam (AXB) algorithm versus anisotropy analysis algorithm (AAA) for the treatment of lung cancer. Methods Twenty patients with lung cancer were randomly selected. After the CT images were imported into the planning system, target areas and organs-at-risk (OAR) were delineated, and the VMAT with two arcs was designed for each patient. The two algorithms were used to calculate the dosimetric distributions in target areas and the doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) such as lungs, heart and spinal cord, and the results calculated by AXB algorithm were compared with those calculated by AAA. Results For planning gross target volume, there was no significant difference between AXB algorithm and AAA in the calculation of minimum dose (P>0.05), but the maximum dose and mean dose calculated by AXB algorithm were lower than those calculated by AAA (P<0.05). For planning target volume, there was no significant difference between two algorithms in the calculation of maximum dose and minimum dose (P>0.05), but the mean dose calculated by AXB algorithm was lower than that calculated by AAA (P<0.05). Moreover, AXB algorithm was superior to AAA in conformity index and homogeneity index (P<0.05). The maximum dose of spinal cord, the V30, V40 and mean dose of the heart, and the V5, V20 and mean dose of the lungs which were calculated by AXB algorithm were lower than those obtained by AAA (P<0.05). Conclusion Both AAA and AXB algorithm can satisfy the clinical requirements, but compared with AAA, AXB algorithm is more accurate, especially for low-density areas like the lungs.

相似文献/References:

[1]史贵连,叶福丽.肺癌调强放疗计划的设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(03):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.03.013]
[2]朱夫海,吴伟章,王 勇,等.肺癌螺旋断层放疗计划设计的初步研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):4979.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.002]
[3]翁邓胡,王 建,尹中明,等.基于锥形束CT研究肺癌图像引导放疗的内靶区外放边界值[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):5012.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.009]
[4]彭莹莹,张书旭,谭剑明,等.基于PCNN的PET/CT图像分割在肺癌靶区勾画中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(04):5022.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.04.011]
[5]王 涛,王运来.基于4D-CT和Mimics软件模拟分析肺癌肿瘤的呼吸运动规律[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(05):5132.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.05.008]
[6]周 琼,周剑良,张一戈,等.基于锥形束CT肺癌放射治疗两种体位固定技术摆位误差的研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(06):5258.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.06.008]
[7]张矛,金海国,苏清秀,等.肺癌静态调强与容积旋转调强放射治疗间比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4364.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.006]
[8]罗焕丽,靳富,王颖,等.肿瘤放疗中体外误差与体内误差的关联性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(1):10.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):10.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.003]
[9]王琳婧,张书旭,袁克虹,等.基于图像变形配准的肺癌自适应放疗剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(1):16.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(6):16.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.01.004]
[10]李政良,等.4DCT下肺癌大体肿瘤的变化及相关因素分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(2):208.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.02.021]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2020-01-08 【基金项目】湖南省2018年度省级临床重点专科建设项目；湖南省肺癌诊疗能力提升项目 【作者简介】徐诗磊，研究方向：放疗计划设计，E-mail: 454038863@qq.com 【通信作者】张九堂，研究方向：医学物理，E-mail: jiutz@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-03