[1]张平,邓官华,戴鹏,等. RapidArc与HybridArc技术在大体积脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):887-891.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.005]
　ZHANG Ping,DENG Guanhua,DAI Peng,et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases: a dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy generated with RapidArc versus HybridArc[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2019,36(8):887-891.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.005]
点击复制

 RapidArc与HybridArc技术在大体积脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科中的剂量学比较()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
36卷
期数:
2019年第8期
页码:
887-891
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2019-08-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases: a dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy generated with RapidArc versus HybridArc
文章编号:
1005-202X（2019）08-0887-05
作者:
 张平1; 邓官华1; 戴鹏1; 罗龙辉1; 黄庆1; 蔡林波1; 王军2
 1.广东三九脑科医院肿瘤综合治疗中心， 广东 广州 510510； 2.南方医科大学南方医院神经外科， 广东 广州 510515
Author(s):
 ZHANG Ping1;  DENG Guanhua1;  DAI Peng1;  LUO Longhui1;  HUANG Qing1;  CAI Linbo1;  WANG Jun2
 1. Department of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China; 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
关键词:
 ; 大体积脑转移瘤; 立体定向放射外科; HybridArc技术; RapidArc技术; 剂量学比较
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: large brain metastases;  stereotactic radiosurgery;  HybridArc;  RapidArc;  dosimetric comparison
分类号:
R815.6；R312
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2019.08.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：探讨RapidArc与HybridArc技术对大体积脑转移瘤的立体定向放射外科计划剂量学参数和机器跳数的影响。方法：选择10例颅内大体积脑转移瘤患者作为研究对象。分别采用RapidArc和HybridArc技术设计计划，比较两组计划的靶区适形度指数（CI）、梯度跌落指数（GI）、均匀性指数（HI），危及器官剂量分布，靶区周边正常组织受量体积以及机器跳数。结果：与RapidArc计划相比，HybridArc计划的靶区HI差异无统计学意义（t=-1.400, P=0.161），CI不接近1，而GI更接近于1，差异具有统计学意义（CI：t=-2.521, P=0.012；GI：t=-2.240, P=0.025）。与RapidArc计划相比，HybridArc计划的周边正常组织2 Gy剂量受照体积更少，差异有统计学意义（P=0.012），4、6、8和12 Gy剂量受照体积比较，差异无统计学意义（P=0.575、0.050、0.069、0.068），16和20 Gy剂量受照体积更高，差异有统计学意义（P=0.012、0.017）。与RapidArc计划相比，HybridArc计划的脑干、右眼、左侧视神经和右侧视神经最大受照剂量更低，差异具有统计学意义（P=0.012、0.017、0.017、0.017），左侧晶体、右侧晶体、左眼、视交叉最大受照剂量相似（P[≥]0.05）。与RapidArc计划相比，HybridArc计划的机器跳数平均减少908 MU。结论：在大体积脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科中，采用HybridArc技术设计计划，靶区适形度更好，剂量梯度跌落更陡，且可明显减少机器跳数，但正常组织高剂量区受量更高，部分危及器官最大受照剂量更低。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of HybridArc and Rapidarc on the dosimetric parameters and machine units of stereotactic radiosurgery plans for large brain metastases. Methods Ten patients with large brain metastases were enrolled in this study. Different techniques, namely RapidArc and HybridArc, were used to design two kinds of treatment plans for each patient. The conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI) of target areas, the dose distributions of organs-at-risk, the doses to normal tissues and machine units between RapidArc plan and HybridArc plan were compared. Results The HI of target areas was similar in RapidArc plan and HybridArc plan, without statistical difference (t=-1.400, P=0.161); the CI of target areas in RapidArc plan was closer to 1, while the GI of target areas in HybridArc plan was closer to 1, with statistical differences (CI: t=-2.521, P=0.012; GI: t=-2.240, P=0.025). Compared with RapidArc plan, HybridArc plan had reduced 2 Gy isodose volume, with statistical difference (P=0.012) and increased 16 and 20 Gy isodose volumes, with statistical difference (P=0.012, 0.017). No significant difference was found between RapidArc plan and HybridArc plan in 4, 6, 8 and 12 Gy isodose volumes (P=0.575, 0.050, 0.069, 0.068). The maximum dose of brainstem, right eye, left optic nerve and right optic nerve in HybridArc plan were lower than those in RapidArc plan, with statistical differences (P=0.012, 0.017, 0.017, 0.017), but the maximum dose of bilateral lens, left eye and chiasm were similar in the two kinds of plans (P[≥]0.05). Compared with that of RapidArc plan, the machine units of HybridArc plan was reduced by 908 MU. Conclusion Using HybridArc to design stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases provided better target conformity and GI, less machine monitor units, higher dose in high-dose area of normal tissues and lower maximum dose of some organs-at-risk.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2019-04-09
【基金项目】广东省自然科学基金（2017A030313597）
【作者简介】张平，工程师，研究方向：神经肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: zhangping0406@126.com
【通信作者】王军，主治医师，研究方向：功能与立体定向放射神经外科，E-mail: jwang6@smu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-26