[1]贺先桃,王占宇,谭军文,等. 固定铅门模式下容积旋转调强放疗与动态调强放疗在乳腺癌根治术后放疗中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(8):889-894.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.005]
　HE Xiantao,WANG Zhanyu,TAN Junwen,et al. Comparison of VMAT vs dIMRT with fixed-jaw technique for postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(8):889-894.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.005]
点击复制

 固定铅门模式下容积旋转调强放疗与动态调强放疗在乳腺癌根治术后放疗中的比较
()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第8期
页码:
889-894
栏目:
医学放射物理
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of VMAT vs dIMRT with fixed-jaw technique for postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）08-0889-06
作者:
 贺先桃; 王占宇; 谭军文; 龙雨松; 李钢; 冯永富
 柳州市工人医院肿瘤科放疗室， 广西 柳州 545005
Author(s):
 HE Xiantao;  WANG Zhanyu;  TAN Junwen;  LONG Yusong;  LI Gang;  FENG Yongfu
 Radiotherapy Treatment Room, Department of Oncology, Liuzhou Worker’s Hospital, Liuzhou 545005, China
关键词:
 ; 乳腺癌; 容积旋转调强; 动态调强; 固定铅门; 剂量学
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: breast cancer;  volumetric modulated arc therapy;  dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy;  fixed-jaw;  dosimetry
分类号:
R730.55
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.08.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：探讨固定铅门模式下乳腺癌根治术后放疗中容积旋转调强放疗（VMAT）与动态调强放疗（dIMRT）的剂量学差异及技术特点。 方法：选取左、右侧根治术后乳腺癌患者各10例，使用Raystation 4.7.5治疗计划系统制定VMAT计划和Eclipse 11.0治疗计划系统制定7野dIMRT计划，两种计划均采用合适的固定铅门技术，靶区处方剂量为50 Gy/25 F。比较两种计划的剂量学差异、机器跳数、治疗出束时间以及剂量验证γ通过率。 结果：VMAT计划的靶区最大剂量、平均剂量、均匀性指数均优于dIMRT计划，前者剂量均匀性显著提升，且靶区内无剂量热点；两种计划的最小剂量、适形指数、靶区覆盖率基本相近（P>0.05）。主要危及器官双肺、心脏等的整体受照剂量VMAT计划明显低于dIMRT，尤其患侧肺的低剂量照射体积V5、V20及心脏的V30显著降低；正常组织的整体受量VMAT计划偏高。VMAT计划单次照射的机器跳数比dIMRT平均减少了59%，治疗出束时间平均减少了60%。两种计划的γ通过率均满足治疗要求（>95%）。 结论：两种技术均能满足临床处方要求，但VMAT技术具有更大的优势，其靶区剂量均匀性更好，可明显降低主要危及器官的整体受照剂量，尤其降低肺的低剂量照射体积，且显著减少机器跳数，缩短治疗时间。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To explore the dosimetric differences and technology features of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT) with fixed-jaws technique for postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer. Methods Twenty breast cancer patients after radical surgery were selected, with 10 cases of left-sided breast cancer and 10 of right-sided breast cancer. Raystation 4.7.5 treatment planning system and Eclipse 11.0 treatment planning system were used to design VMAT plans and 7-field dIMRT plans, respectively, with a target prescription dose of 50 Gy/25 F. Moreover, the most appropriate fixed-jaw technology was applied for the two plans of each patient. The dosimetric differences, monitor units, treatment time and gamma passing rate in dose verification were compared. Results VMAT plans were better than dIMRT plans in the maximum dose, mean dose, and homogeneity index of target areas, and the dose homogeneity of the former was significantly improved, without hot spots in target areas. The minimum dose, conformity index and target coverage of VMAT plans and dIMRT plans were basically similar (P>0.05). Compared with dIMRT plans, VMAT plans showed significantly decreased radiotherapy dose of major organs-at-risk, such as the whole lung and heart, especially the V5, V20 of low dose region in the ipsilateral lung and the V30 of the heart. The total dose of normal tissue in VMAT plans was slightly higher than that in dIMRT plans. Compared with those in dIMRI plans, the average number of monitor units was reduced by an average of 59% per fraction, and the treatment time was reduced by an average of 60% per fraction in VMAT plans. The gamma passing rate of VMAT plans and dIMRT plans met the requirement of treatment (>95%). Conclusion Both VMAT and dIMRT meet the requirements of clinical prescription, but VMAT has more advantages. VMAT can not only provide better dose homogeneity, significantly reduce the total dose of major organs-at-risk, especially the low dose volume of lungs, but also obviously decrease monitor units and shorten treatment time.

相似文献/References:

[1]柏 晗,王 丽,刘旭红,等.左乳腺5种不同主野分布IMRT计划的剂量比较分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):210.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.013]
[2]张晋建,黎 静,文 婷,等.Arc CHECK在乳腺癌螺旋断层放疗计划剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(02):244.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.02.021]
[3]白 雪,杜向慧,王升晔,等.半野技术结合非共面照射技术在乳腺癌胸锁联合照射中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4849.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.001]
[4]赵永亮,储开岳,吴建亭,等.两种不同调强技术配合主动呼吸控制系统在乳腺癌放疗中的比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2014,31(03):4862.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2014.03.004]
[5]花威,张西志,张先稳,等.RapidArc在乳腺癌术后放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(02):3984.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.02.005]
[6]徐金济,成俊,李伟,等.左侧乳腺癌改良根治术后逆向调强放射治疗的摆位误差分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4358.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.004]
[7]孟慧鹏,孙小喆,孙劲松,等.右乳腺癌术后放疗中VMAT和dIMRT的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2013,30(05):4387.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2013.05.011]
[8]刘旭红,陈晓,艾毅钦,等.早期左乳腺癌保乳术后仰卧位和俯卧位照射剂量学比较与分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(05):737.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.028]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(8):737.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.05.028]
[9]张艺宝,吴昊,李莎,等.临床前验证与几何对比分析基于图谱库的危及器官自动勾画[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(8):761.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.001]
[10]段云龙,杨涛,曲宝林,等.乳腺癌保乳切线野三维适形、切线野正向调强及逆向调强放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2015,32(06):841.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.017]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2015,32(8):841.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2015.06.017]
[11]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(8):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[12]蔡思清,蔡冬鹭,颜建湘,等. 基于数字乳腺三维断层摄影技术的乳腺癌分子亚型特征[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(5):456.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.05.005]
[13]成树林,宾石珍,单冬勇,等. 铅门跟随技术与铅门固定技术在乳腺癌根治术后调强放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(5):480.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.05.010]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):480.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.05.010]
[14]何亚男,罗焕丽,靳富,等. TomoDirect技术在乳腺癌术后胸壁放疗中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):555.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):555.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.004]
[15]袁细伟,周蓉蓉,张子健. 早期乳腺癌保乳术后3D-CRT与IMRT的剂量学分布及皮肤损害比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(6):574.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):574.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.06.007]
[16]杨思原,张季,潘香,等. 左乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步加量静态调强和容积旋转调强的剂量学研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(9):874.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):874.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.09.003]
[17]周琼,陈维军,王奇,等. 基于RTOG 1005早期乳腺癌调强多目标优化计划和单目标优化计划比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(10):993.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.005]
[18]周寨文,张延伟,曾道辉,等. 乳腺癌MRI表现与Ki-67、E-cad表达的关系[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(10):1008.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.10.008]
[19]吴丽丽,张基永,黄宝添,等. 非均整模式光子线在乳腺癌调强放疗的剂量学评估[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(11):1086.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.002]
　WU Lili,ZHANG Jiyong,HUANG Baotian,et al. Evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using flattening filter free photon beams for patients with breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):1086.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.11.002]
[20]周晖,许赪,沈文同,等. 左乳癌保乳术后调强放疗计划三维剂量验证[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2017,34(12):1216.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.12.006]
　ZHOU Hui,XU Cheng,SHEN Wentong,et al. Three-dimensional dose verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy after left breast-conserving surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2017,34(8):1216.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2017.12.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-05-12
【作者简介】贺先桃，助理工程师，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: hxt_467842013@sina.com
【通信作者】王占宇，工程师，研究方向：肿瘤放射物理，E-mail: wzy_liuzhou@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-26