[1]丁家峰,曾尧,李新梅,等. 一种用于艾条差异性分析的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(7):816-821.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.015]
　DING Jiafeng,ZENG Yao,LI Xinmei,et al. A method for moxa difference analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(7):816-821.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.015]
点击复制

 一种用于艾条差异性分析的方法()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第7期
页码:
816-821
栏目:
医学生物物理
出版日期:
2018-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 A method for moxa difference analysis
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）07-0816-06
作者:
 丁家峰1; 曾尧1; 李新梅1; 楚鑫1; 梁健1; 许雪梅1; 丁一鹏1; 常小荣2; 刘密2
 1.中南大学物理与电子学院， 湖南 长沙 410083； 2.湖南中医药大学针灸推拿学院， 湖南 长沙 410208
Author(s):
 DING Jiafeng1;  ZENG Yao1;  LI Xinmei1;  CHU Xin1;  LIANG Jian1;  XU Xuemei1;  DING Yipeng1;  CHANG Xiaorong2;  LIU Mi2
 1. School of Physics and Electronics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2. Acupuncture and Massage College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
关键词:
 ; 艾灸; 艾条; 传热学; 最优热源强度模型; 差异
Keywords:
 ; Keywords: moxibustion;  moxa;  heat transfer;  optimal heat source intensity model;  difference
分类号:
TK124，R245-0
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.07.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：通过分析艾灸的热学特性，建立最优热源强度模型以便快速区分艾条差异，提高艾灸疗效。 方法：应用传热学的基本理论，建立最优热源强度模型，搭建实验平台，采集实验数据，对实验数据进行预处理，并通过模型计算出每个样本的最优热源强度，通过对比不同直径、不同种类的3种样本艾条的最优源热强度，快速区分3种艾条之间差异。 结果：大直径的纯艾条最优热源强度比小直径的纯艾条高，相同直径纯艾条的最优热源强度比温和灸艾条高。对3种样本进行非参数检验的显著性水平小于0.05，说明3个样本的最优热源强度差异显著。 结论：艾条最优热源强度随艾条直径和种类而变化，通过艾灸的最优热源强度模型可以快速区分艾条之间的差异，减小艾灸副作用，提高艾灸疗效，同时也为艾灸从业者提供参考。
Abstract:
 Abstract: Objective To analyze the thermal characteristics of moxibustion and establish the optimal heat source intensity models for quickly distinguishing the differences of moxa and improving the therapeutic efficacy of moxibustion. Methods The basic theory of heat transfer was applied to establish the optimal heat source intensity model, and then an experiment platform was set up. The experimental data were collected and preprocessed, and the optimal heat source intensity of each sample was obtained by model calculation. By comparing the optimal heat source intensity of 3 samples of different diameters and different types, the differences among the 3 kinds of moxa were quickly distinguished. Results The optimal heat source intensity of pure moxa with large diameter was higher than that of the small one. As to same diameter, the optimal heat source intensity of pure moxa was higher than that of the mild one. The significance levels of nonparametric test on the 3 samples were less than 0.05, which indicated that the differences in the optimal heat source intensity of the 3 samples were significant. Conclusion The optimal heat source intensity varies with the diameters and types of moxa. The differences among different kinds of moxa can be quickly distinguished by the optimal heat source intensity model of moxibustion, which can reduce the side effects and improve the curative effect of moxibustion, providing a reference for moxibustion practitioners.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(7):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2018-05-20
【基金项目】国家重点基础研究发展计划“973计划”项目（2015CB554502）；国家自然科学基金（61501525）
【作者简介】丁家峰，博士，副教授，主要研究方向：艾灸热学特性研究，E-mail: csjfding@qq.com
【通信作者】李新梅，博士，副教授，主要研究方向：艾灸热学特性研究，E-mail: 1584245685@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-24