[1]刘桂玉,韦桂荣,覃冬凌. 腹主动脉远端预置球囊阻断治疗凶险型前置胎盘的有效性与安全性[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2018,35(4):485-488.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.021]
　LIU Guiyu,WEI Guirong,QIN Dongling. Effectiveness and safety of balloon occlusion in distal abdominal aorta for parturient women with pernicious placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2018,35(4):485-488.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.021]
点击复制

 腹主动脉远端预置球囊阻断治疗凶险型前置胎盘的有效性与安全性()
分享到：

《中国医学物理学杂志》[ISSN:1005-202X/CN:44-1351/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2018年第4期
页码:
485-488
栏目:
其他（激光医学等）
出版日期:
2018-04-21

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effectiveness and safety of balloon occlusion in distal abdominal aorta for parturient women with pernicious placenta previa
文章编号:
1005-202X（2018）04-0485-04
作者:
 刘桂玉; 韦桂荣; 覃冬凌
 广西科技大学第一附属医院产科， 广西 柳州 545002
Author(s):
 LIU Guiyu;  WEI Guirong;  QIN Dongling
 Department of Obstetrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545002, China
关键词:
 ; 凶险型前置胎盘; 腹主动脉远端; 球囊; 围产期并发症; 新生儿Apgar评分
Keywords:
 ; pernicious placenta previa;  distal abdominal aorta;  balloon;  perinatal complications;  newborn Apgar score
分类号:
R714.7
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2018.04.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的：分析凶险型前置胎盘产妇术前运用腹主动脉远端预置球囊的安全性和有效性。 方法：连续选择2012年5月至2017年5月诊断凶险型前置胎盘产妇共68例，随机分为对照组和观察组各34例，对照组仅采用剖宫产术，观察组术前采用腹主动脉远端预置球囊。对比妊娠结局。 结果：观察组出血量、输入红细胞悬液均显著少于对照组，泌尿系统和肠道损伤、子宫切除、感染、急性肾衰发生率分别为5.9%（2/34）、2.9%（1/34）、5.9%（2/34）、2.9%（1/34），均显著低于对照组的23.5%（8/34）、17.6%（6/34）、26.5%（9/34）、20.6%（7/34），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），但两组患者的死亡率、腹腔积血发生率无显著差异（P>0.05）。观察组新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。随访6个月观察组产后出血1例，经保守治疗后好转；感染1例，经积极、有效抗生素治愈；下肢动静脉血栓3例，未出现严重下肢缺血坏死、静脉血栓脱落等并发症。术前介入操作1~5 min，平均（2.3±0.9） min，总计放射量45~95 mGy，平均（78.4±16.3） mGy。 结论：凶险型前置胎盘产妇术前运用腹主动脉远端预置球囊有较好的安全性和有效性。
Abstract:
 Objective To study the effectiveness and safety of balloon occlusion in distal abdominal aorta before the caesarean section for parturient woman with pernicious placenta previa. Methods A total of 68 consecutive parturient women diagnosed with pernicious placenta previa between May 2012 and May 2017 were enrolled and then randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 34 cases in each group. The patients in control group received only caesarean section, while those in observation group were treated with balloon occlusion in distal abdominal aorta before caesarean section. The differences in pregnancy outcomes were compared. Results The amount of bleeding and red blood cell suspension infusion in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group. The incidences of urinary tract and intestinal injury, hysterectomy, infection, acute renal failure in observation group were 5.9% (2/34), 2.9% (1/34), 5.9% (2/34) and 2.9% (1/34), respectively, significantly lower than 23.5% (8/34), 17.6% (6/34), 26.5% (9/34) and 20.6% (7/34) in control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The comparison between two groups didn’t showed any statistical differences in mortality and the incidence of hemoperitoneum (P>0.05). The 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores of the newborns in observation group was significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). Followed-up for 6 months after caesarean section, in operation group, 1 case of postpartum hemorrhage were improved after conservative treatment, and 1 case was infected and then cured by active and effective antibiotics, and 3 cases had lower extremity arteriovenous thrombosis, without developing any severe ischemic necrosis of the lower extremities or venous thrombosis. The duration of preoperative intervention was 1-5 min, with an average of (2.3±0.9) min, and the total amount of radiotherapy dose was 45-95 mGy, with an average of (78.4±16.3) mGy. Conclusion Applying balloon occlusion in distal abdominal aorta before the caesarean section for parturient woman with pernicious placenta previa is proved to be effective and safe.

相似文献/References:

[1]王遥,霍万里,熊壮,等.TACE手术中不同站姿下铅眼镜和铅面罩对医生眼晶状体防护效果的蒙特卡洛模拟比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):553.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.003]
[2]张新,谷晓芳,王培臣,等.轻离子束治疗设备注册检验关键技术问题[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):559.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.004]
[3]江芬芬,王培,康盛伟,等. 热释光剂量片测量肺部肿瘤放疗剂量的方法[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):564.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.005]
[4]刘洪源,彭威,杨锐,等. 锥形束CT离线校正肺癌摆位误差[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):573.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.007]
[5]赵彪,潘香,杨毅,等. 右乳癌保乳术后瘤床同步X线和后程电子线补量调强放疗剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(6):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):576.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.06.008]
[6]邓南,钱建庭,刁现芬,等. 基于宽带检测放疗X-光光声效应仿体实验[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):865.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.001]
[7]张先稳,李军,张西志,等. 宫颈癌术后5野调强放疗4个变量组合的最佳治疗模式的剂量学[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):872.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.002]
[8]胡健,李承军,徐利明,等. 床面倾斜对剂量验证通过率的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):881.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.003]
[9]陈亚正,肖明勇,孙春堂,等. 准直器角度对宫颈癌术后VMAT计划的影响[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):885.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.004]
[10]李毅,唐丰文,张晓智. 基于四维CT和锥形束CT确定非小细胞肺癌放疗靶区外放边界[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(9):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]
　[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2016,33(4):892.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.09.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 【收稿日期】2017-10-27
【基金项目】广西壮族自治区卫生厅科研课题（Z2012609）
【作者简介】刘桂玉，硕士，副主任医师，研究方向：重症产科，E-mail: lzxd_7671@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-23